Initiating santripreneurship through narrative inquiry: Integration of digital marketing and technical proficiency for pesantren entrepreneurship

Authors

  • Elok Putri Nimasari Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo
  • Fery Setiawan Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo
  • Rohfin Andria Gestanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Keywords:

Community service, enterprises, narrative inquiry, pesantren

Abstract

Although entrepreneurship training is commonly conducted for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), entrepreneurship training that integrates digital marketing and technical proficiency with a narrative inquiry approach is rarely implemented in Islamic boarding school or pesantren. This narrative inquiry research for community service program aimed to develop and implement an integrated training program that includes excellent service training, local coffee processing, and digital marketing at entrepreneurship-based Islamic boarding schools. Thirteen participants from a pesantren and a entrepreneurship-partner participated in this study. Data were collected from observation and unstructured interviews spanning five months. Drawing on community engagement theory, the findings identified three micro themes: active participation and community involvement; multidisciplinary collaboration and synergy; and empowerment and self-transformation. The contribution of this present study is to provide empirical and practical evidence regarding how community engagement perspective can describe to what extent digital marketing and technical proficiency help micro, small, and medium enterprises in pesantren.

References

E. Leonidou, M. Christofi, D. Vrontis, and A. Thrassou, “An integrative framework of stakeholder engagement for innovation management and entrepreneurship development,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 119, pp. 245–258, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.054.

T. M. Blanchflower, “Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts‐Based, and Community‐Based Participatory Research Approaches. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. ISBN 9781462514380. 300 pp. (Paperback),” Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 101–102, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1111/fcsr.12276.

S. Veronica, G.-P. Alexeis, C. Valentina, and G. Elisa, “Do stakeholder capabilities promote sustainable business innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises? Evidence from Italy,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 119, pp. 131–141, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.025.

Y. Liu, “The micro-foundations of global business incubation: Stakeholder engagement and strategic entrepreneurial partnerships,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 161, p. 120294, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120294.

A. M. Afrilia, “Digital Marketing As A Marketing Communication Strategy For ‘Waroenk Ora Umum’ In Increasing The Number Of Consumers,” J. Ris. Komun., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 147–157, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.24329/jurkom.v1i1.21.

U. Khouroh, C. S. Ratnaningsih, B. Rahayudi, and I. Windhyastiti, “Implementation of Social-Bricolage Entrepreneurship and Digital Marketing as a Resilience Strategy for Sustainable Food Yard Program Actors - University of Merdeka Malang Repository,” J. Bisnis dan Manaj., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 150–160, 2022. [Online]. Available at: https://eprints.unmer.ac.id/id/eprint/3318/.

K. Olcoń et al., “‘No university without community’: engaging the community in social work simulations,” High. Educ. Res. Dev., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 2000–2014, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2023.2197192.

A. Curtin and K. Hall, “Research methods for pedagogy: seeing the hidden and hard to know,” Int. J. Res. Method Educ., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 367–371, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2018.1495366.

M. Morris, M. Schindehutte, V. Edmonds, and C. Watters, “Inner city engagement and the university: Mutuality, emergence and transformation,” Entrep. Reg. Dev., vol. 23, no. 5–6, pp. 287–315, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1080/08985626.2011.580160.

N. Di Paola, O. Meglio, and R. Vona, “Entrepreneurship education in entrepreneurship laboratories,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 21, no. 2, p. 100793, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100793.

H. Dahles, S. Khieng, M. Verver, and I. Manders, “Social entrepreneurship and tourism in Cambodia: advancing community engagement,” J. Sustain. Tour., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 816–833, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09669582.2019.1706544.

E. B. Swanson, “Technology entrepreneurship is more than one might think,” Inf. Organ., vol. 34, no. 2, p. 100512, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100512.

J. C. Short, J. A. Chandler, and M. Wolfe, “Community markets and entrepreneurship: A primer,” J. Bus. Ventur. Insights, vol. 21, p. e00453, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00453.

K. Brown, K. Shephard, D. Warren, G. Hesson, and J. Fleming, “Using phenomenography to build an understanding of how university people conceptualise their community-engaged activities,” High. Educ. Res. Dev., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 643–657, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1137880.

H.-E. Al Issa, M. T. T. Thai, and H. Nguyen, “A systematic mapping of social entrepreneurship education: A call for increased collaboration, ethics, and research frameworks,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 22, no. 3, p. 101025, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101025.

M. S. Reed et al., “A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?,” Restor. Ecol., vol. 26, no. S1, pp. S7–S17, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1111/rec.12541.

E. Bernadó and F. Bratzke, “Revisiting EntreComp through a systematic literature review of entrepreneurial competences. Implications for entrepreneurship education and future research,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 22, no. 3, p. 101010, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101010.

A. R. Galvão, C. S. E. Marques, J. J. Ferreira, and V. Braga, “Stakeholders’ role in entrepreneurship education and training programmes with impacts on regional development,” J. Rural Stud., vol. 74, pp. 169–179, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.013.

R. J. Pidduck and R. Tucker, “Meaningful heterodoxies: Advancing entrepreneurship through engagement with unorthodox phenomena,” J. Bus. Ventur. Insights, vol. 18, p. e00319, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00319.

E. P. Nimasari, S. Setiawan, and A. Munir, “How Do Indonesian Student-Teachers Experience Wellbeing during Research Supervision? A Qualitative Interview Study,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 348–366, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.23.3.17.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles