DELPHI METHOD: THE DEVELOPMENT OF ROBOTIC LEARNING SURVEY IN TERTIARY EDUCATION

Irdayanti Mat Nashir, Abdullah Yusoff, Moh Khairudin, Muhammad Ridzuan Idris, Nurul Nazirah Imam Ma'arof

Abstract


This article clarify the development of instrument which is related with robotic based learning by using the Delphi methods. The Delphi method provides the chance for researchers to gather input from participants without demanding them to work face-to-face. Often, the process is used to find consensus among experts who have different opinions and observations. The Delphi method enables group problem-solving using an iterative process of problem definition, discussion, feedback, and revisions. This paper discussed the basics of the Delphi method, its application potential, the selection of expert panels and the means on how consensus can be reached among the participants and also the procedure to obtain the final criteria of robotic learning which is 67 from 188 initially.


Keywords


Delphi technique; Expert panels; Instruments; Robotic based learning; Robotic learning; Technical and vocational education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alahlafi, A. and Burge, S. (2005), “What should undergraduate medical students know about psoriasis? Involving patients in curriculum development: modified Delphi technique”, British Medical Journal, Vol. 330 No. 7492, pp. 633-636

Bogdan, R.C & Bliken, S. (2002). Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction to the Theory and Methods (4th Ed.). Boston: Allyn Bacon.

Brown, V.R. and Paulus, P.B. (2002), “Making group brainstorming more effective: recommendations from an associative memory perspective”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 208-212.

Clibbens, N., Walters, S. and Baird, W. (2012), “Delphi research: issues raised by a pilot study”, Nurse Researcher, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 37-44.

Critcher, C. and Gladstone, B. (1998), “Utilizing the Delphi technique in policy discussion: a case study of a privatized utility in Britain”, Public Administration, Vol. 76 No. 3, pp. 431-449.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. (Thousand Oaks, Ed.) (3rd Ed.). Sage Publications.

Coon, D., John O.Mitterer, Tanya Martini. (2018). Psychology Modules for Active Learning. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Dommett, E. J. (2018). Learner ownership of technology-enhanced learning. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2017-0042

Fallon, K.E. and Trevitt, A.C. (2006). “Optimising a curriculum for clinical haematology and biochemistry in sports medicine: a Delphi approach”, British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 139-144.

Fink, L.D. (2003). Creating Significant Learning Experiences, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Frieman, J., S. R. (2016). Learning:A Behavioral, Cognitive and Evolutionary Synthesis. (Reid Hester, Ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Helen Sitlington, Alan Coetzer, (2015). "Using the Delphi technique to support curriculum development", Education + Training, Vol. 57 Issue: 3, pp.306-321, https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2014-0010

Irdayanti, M. N., Ramlee, M., and Abdullah, Y. (2015). Delphi Technique: Enhancing Research in Technical and Vocational Education. International business, 3, 34.

Karim M.E, Lemaignan, S. and Mondada, F. (2016), "A review: Can robots reshape K-12 STEM education?" 2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), Lyon, 2015, pp. 1-8. doi: 10.1109/ARSO.2015.7428217

Keeney, S., Hasson, F. and McKenna, H.P. (2001), “A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing”, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 38No. 2, pp. 195-200.

Linstone, H.A. and Turoff, M. (1975), the Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, Addison-Wesley, London.

Okoli, C. and Pawlowski, S. (2004), “The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications”, Information & Management, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 15-29

Robert Loo. (2002). The Delphi method: a powerful tool for strategic management.

Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25(4), 762–769. doi: 10.1108/13639510210450677

Peck, R., Olsen, C. & Devore, J.L. (2015). Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis. (Brooks Cole, Ed.) (5th Ed.). Cengage Learning.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. (Thousand Oaks, Ed.) (3rd Ed.). Sage Publications.

Shahabuddin, H., Rohizani, Y. (2007). Pedagogi: Strategi dan Teknik Mengajar dengan Berkesan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publications & Distributors Sdn.Bhd.

Whetten, D.A. (2007), “Principles of effective course design: What I wish I had known about learner-cantered teaching 30 years ago”, Journal of Management Education, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 339-357.

Witt, R.R. and Puntel de Almeida, M.C. (2008). “Identification of nurses’ competencies in primary health care through a Delphi study in Southern Brazil”, Public Health Nursing, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 336-343.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/joves.v2i1.761

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

p-ISSN 2614-7483

e-ISSN 2614-7475

Organized by 

Master of Vocational Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Vocational Program (D-IV) of Food Service Industry, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Published by 

Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

 

Lisensi Creative Commons

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional