PENILAIAN PELAKSANAAN KURIKULUM MATA PELAJARAN SAINS RUMAH TANGGA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL STAKE COUNTENANCE: SATU KAJIAN LITERATUR

Nor Asimah Zakaria

Abstract


The purpose of this concept paper was to discuss and analysis evaluation models using in the curriculum implementation or educational program evaluation. This paper focused on secondry school home science education subject and Stake Countenance Model. This model focused on congruence between what was intended to occur and what was actually observed to occur before, during, and after curriculum implementation. The Stake Countenance Model used antecedents, transactions and outcomes as a core concepts to structure the view of the curriculum implementation evaluation or an educational program evaluation. The Stake model demonstrated its effectiveness by facilitating a thorough examination of both quantitative and qualitative research method.

Kertas konsep ini adalah bertujuan untuk membincangkan dan menganalisis model penilaian yang digunakan dalam penilaian pelaksanaan kurikulum atau program pendidikan. Kertas konsep ini memberi tumpuan kepada Mata Pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga sekolah menengah yang diajar pada peringkat menengah atas dan Model Stake Countenance. Model ini membincangkan dua matrik iaitu matrik deskripsi dan matrik pertimbangan yang memberi tumpuan kepada kepada kesesuaian antara apa yang dirancang untuk berlaku dan apa yang sebenarnya berlaku semasa perlaksanaan dengan melakukan pemerhatian sebelum, semasa, dan selepas pelaksanaan seseuatu kurikulum atau program pendidikan. Model Stake Countenance membincangkan tiga fasa pengumpulan data; masukan, proses dan hasil sebagai teras konsep dalam penilaian pelaksanaan kurikulum atau penilaian program pendidikan. Model Stake menunjukkan keberkesanannya dengan memudahkan penilai membuat pertimbangan menyeluruh dengan menggunakan kaedah penyelidikan kuantitatif atau kualitatif.


Keywords


Kurikulum; Model Stake Countenance; Pendidikan Sains Rumah Tangga

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akta Pendidikan 1996 (akta 550). (1996). Retrieved from http://www.polisas.edu.my/portal/images/stories/Mqa/Akta550.pdf.

Cronbach, L. J. (1983). Course Improvement through Evaluation Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation (pp. 101-115). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Darusalam, G. (2003). Keberkesanan kursus Pengajian Agama Islam, Diploma Perguruan Malaysia di Maktab-Maktab Perguruan Malaysia. (Tesis Ijazah Kedoktoran Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan), Universiti Malaya.

Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran, Mata Pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga Tingkatan 4. (2015). Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur.

Eisner, E. W. (1967). Instructional and expressive educational objectives: Their formulation and use in curriculum.

Eisner, E. W. (1993). Reshaping assessment in education: Some criteria in search of practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(3), 219-233.

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2017). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Frechtling, J. A. (2007). Logic Modeling Methods In Program Evaluation. San Fransisco: John Wiley.

Frechtling, J. A. (2010). The 2010 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation United States: Division of Research and Learning in Formal and Informal Settings National Science Foundation.

Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on Curriculum and Instruction Implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 335-397. doi:10.3102/00346543047002335

Kassim, N. F., & Jalal, F. H. A. (2015). Kurikulum pendidikan awal kanak-kanak dan Modul pendidikan akhlak: Isu dan cabaran masa kini. . Paper presented at the Seminar Penyelidikan Kebangsaan Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Mamat, I. (1996). Reka bentuk dan pengurusan latihan: Konsep dan amalan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Metfessel, N. S., & W.B., M. (1967). A paradigm involving multiple criterion measures for the evaluation of the effectiveness of school programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 27, 931-943.

Ornstein, A., & Hunkins, F. . (2013). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (6th ed.). Boston, Mass: Allyn and Bacon.

Pekeliling Ikhtisas Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia bilangan 9 Tahun 2016. Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah secara berperingkat-peringkat mulai tahun 2017. (2016). Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur.

Popham, W. J. (1993). Educational Evaluation. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Raman, G. (2014). Penilaian pelaksanaan mata pelajaran vokasional-landskap dan nurseri (MPV-LN) di peringkat sekolah menengah di semenanjung Malaysia. Universiti Malaya.

Rohana Hamzah, Z. O., Hasnah Hussiin, Zuraina Ali & Nur Qistina Abdullah. (2017). Pembangunan model penilaian kurikulum berteraskan nilai universal bagi program pendidikan berteraskan teknologi & kejuruteraan: Satu Kerangka konseptual. International Journal of Humanities Technology and Civilization, No.1, 50-61.

Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Henry, G. T. (2018). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Scriven, M. (1999). The Fine Line Between Evaluation and Explanation. Research on Social Work Practice, 9(4), 521-524. doi:10.1177/104973159900900407

Stake, R. E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation: Citeseer.

Stake, R. E. (1983). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation Evaluation models (pp. 287-310): Springer.

Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. New directions for evaluation, 2001(89), 7-98.

Stufflebeam, D., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2012). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice (Vol. 8): Springer Science & Business Media.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability.

Tabori, J. R., & Hermann, J. A. (2001). Project Planning and Evaluation Guidebook: A Manual for Practitioners and Managers of Self Sufficiency Demonstration Projects. Washington DC: Sosiological Practice Association.

Tamir, L. (1991). Profesional and personal knowledge of teachers and teacher educator. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(3), 263-268.

Thanabalan, T. V., Siraj, S., & Alias, N. (2015). Evaluation of a digital story pedagogical module for the indigenous learners using the Stake Countanance model. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2.

Tyler, R. W. (1942). General Statement on Evaluation. The Journal of Educational Research, 35(7), 492-501. doi:10.1080/00220671.1942.10881106

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Werner, A. (2004). A guide to implementation research. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

Wholey, J. S. (2010). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Wimbush, E., & Watson, J. (2000). An evaluation framework for health promotion: theory, quality and effectiveness. Evaluation, 6(3), 301-321.

Worthen, B.R., & Sanders,J.R. (1973). Educational evaluation: theory and practice. . United States of America: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Yahaya, A. (2001). The using of model context, input, process and products (CIPP) in learning programs assessment. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the International Conference on Challenges and Prospects in Teacher Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai.

Yahaya Azizi, Y. N., Hashim Shahrin & Ramli Jamaluddin. (2007). Sejauh manakah model Stufflebeam (KIPP) boleh membantu dalam penilaian program pembelajaran?.Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/2256/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/joves.v2i1.647

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

p-ISSN 2614-7483

e-ISSN 2614-7475

Organized by 

Master of Vocational Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Vocational Program (D-IV) of Food Service Industry, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Published by 

Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

 

Lisensi Creative Commons

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional