From Workshop to Workplace: Transforming Vocational Education Through Authentic Assessment - A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Mumu Komaro Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Amay Suherman Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Bambang eko Saputro Universitas Sebelas April

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/joves.v9i1.14785

Keywords:

Authentic assessment, Automotive engineering, Soft skills, Implementation framework, Systematic review

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines the evolution and effectiveness of authentic assessment practices in vocational education, with a particular focus on automotive engineering programs from 2015 to 2024. Using the PRISMA protocol, we analyzed 17 studies to identify critical success factors, challenges in implementation, and the impact of authentic assessment on both technical competencies and soft skills development. Our analysis reveals three key findings: (1) institutions that adopted comprehensive, authentic assessment frameworks achieved significant improvements in both technical competencies (35% increase) and soft skills development (28% increase); (2) successful implementation was strongly correlated with three critical factors: structured stakeholder engagement (85% effectiveness), technology integration (78% success rate), and robust quality assurance mechanisms (92% implementation rate); and (3) assessment practices evolved from basic frameworks to sophisticated, technology-integrated systems, with implementation success rates improving from 45% to 90% over the studied period. These findings provide practical guidance for vocational institutions by presenting a comprehensive framework that integrates technological innovation with pedagogical best practices while aligning closely with industry needs. The study emphasizes the importance of authentic assessment in preparing students for modern workplace demands, especially in integrating both technical and soft skills. This research advances the theoretical understanding of authentic assessment in vocational education, highlighting its role in enhancing student outcomes and fostering industry alignment.

References

Total Referensi: 30 sumber

Alexander, N. A., Jang, S. T., & others. (2017). The performance cycle: The association between student achievement and state policies tying together teacher performance, student achievement, and accountability. American Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1086/691229

Bayo, A. H., Marcos, I. O., Díaz, A. C., de la Fuente, M. del M., Martín, J. L., Muneta, M. L. M., Rico, v. R., & Hernández, M. R. (2014). Integral framework to drive engineering education beyond technical skills. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(6), 1697–1707.

Booth, A., Noyes, J., Flemming, K., Gerhardus, A., Wahlster, P., van der Wilt, G. J., Mozygemba, K., Refolo, P., Sacchini, D., Tummers, M., & Rehfuess, E. (2018). Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approaches. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 99, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.03.003

Bowers, D. S., Sabin, M., & Raj, R. K. (2023). A practical approach to assessing IT professional skills. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (pp. 106–111).

Brunal, M. C. H., & Torres, H. R. T. (2024). The integration of soft skills in engineering education: A pedagogical and transformative approach. In Encuentro Internacional de Educación en Ingeniería.

Celik, I. (2023). Towards intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, Article 107468.

Choi-Lundberg, D. L., Butler-Henderson, K., Harman, K., & Crawford, J. (2023). A systematic review of digital innovations in technology-enhanced learning designs in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 133–162.

Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., Cowling, M. A., Vanderburg, R., & Vanderburg, M. A. (2023). Implementing educational technology in higher education institutions: A review of technologies, stakeholder perceptions, frameworks and metrics. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16403–16429.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808330883

Deutscher, v., & Winther, E. (2019). A conceptual framework for authentic competence assessment in VET: A logic design model. In Handbook of Vocational Education and Training: Developments in the Changing World of Work (pp. 1299–1312).

Forcael, E., González, v., Orozco, F., Opazo, A., Suazo, Á., & Aránguiz, P. (2015). Application of problem-based learning to teaching the critical path method. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000236

Grytnes, R., Grill, M., Pousette, A., Törner, M., & Nielsen, K. J. (2018). Apprentice or student? The structures of construction industry vocational education and training in Denmark and Sweden and their possible consequences for safety learning. Vocations and Learning, 11(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-017-9180-0

Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, v. L. P., & others. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224

Johnson, T. E., Maring, G. H., Doty, J. H., & Fickle, M. (2006). Cybermentoring: Evolving high-end video conferencing practices to support preservice teacher training. Journal of Interactive Online Learning. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.597.7858&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Khormazard, H. N., Ogg, P., Abdulla, M., & Berge, J. (2023). Development of outcome-based assessment metric for engineering program accreditation. In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA).

Kraft, M. A., Papay, J. P., Johnson, S. M., & others. (2015). Educating amid uncertainty: The organizational supports teachers need to serve students in high-poverty, urban schools. Educational Administration Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15607617

Kritskiy, D., Alexander, K., Koba, S., & Druzhinin, E. (2018). Increasing the reliability of drones due to the use of quaternions in motion. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 9th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT 2018) (pp. 348–352). https://doi.org/10.1109/DESSERT.2018.8409157

Martin, G., Danzig, A. B., Wright, W. F., Flanary, R. A., & Orr, M. T. (2016). School leader internship: Developing, monitoring, and evaluating your leadership experience. Routledge. https://content.taylorfrancis.com/books/download?dac=C2014-0-31652-6&isbn=9781317584056&format=googlePreviewPdf

Odell, v., Molthan-Hill, P., Martin, S., & Sterling, S. (2020). Transformative education to address all sustainable development goals. In Quality Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95870-5_106

Oehmen, J., & Steuber, M. (2012). Criteria for evaluating the success of large-scale engineering programs.

Page, K. R., & Flores-Miller, A. (2021). Lessons we’ve learned—Covid-19 and the undocumented Latinx community. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2024897

Page, T. M. (2015). Common pressures, same results? Recent reforms in professional standards and competences in teacher education for secondary teachers in England, France and elsewhere. Journal of Education for Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2015.1011900

Phillips, J. P., Wendling, A. L., Prunuske, J., Polverento, M. E., Ledford, C. J. W., Erlich, D. R., Guard, E. L., Kost, A., Kovar-Gough, I., Lee, A. L., Liaw, W., Nguyen, B. M., Pratte, M. A., Raleigh, M. F., Sairenji, T., Seehusen, D. A., Walker, S., Young, v., & Morley, C. P. (2022). Medical school characteristics, policies, and practices that support primary care specialty choice: A scoping review of 5 decades of research. Family Medicine, 54(7), 542–554. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2022.440132

Raleigh, M. F., Seehusen, D. A., Phillips, J. P., Prunuske, J., Morley, C. P., Polverento, M. E., Kovar-Gough, I., & Wendling, A. L. (2022). Influences of medical school admissions practices on primary care career choice. Family Medicine, 54(7), 536–541. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2022.260434

Rudinger, B. J. (2020). Technology-enhanced learning. In Quality Education (pp. 876–884). Springer.

Sanchis, P., Lopez-Martin, A., & others. (2017). New organizational and assessment frameworks for company internship programs. In 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7942951/

Sinha, S. N., & Page, W. (2015). Interns’ day in surgery: Improving intern performance through a simulation-based course for final year medical students. ANZ Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12665

Smith, M. J., Mitchell, J. A., Blajeski, S., Parham, B., Harrington, M. M., Ross, B., Sinco, B., Brydon, D. M., Johnson, J. E., Cuddeback, G. S., Smith, J. D., Jordan, N., Bell, M. D., McGeorge, R., Kaminski, K., Suganuma, A., & Kubiak, S. P. (2020). Enhancing vocational training in corrections: A type 1 hybrid randomized controlled trial protocol for evaluating virtual reality job interview training among returning citizens preparing for community re-entry. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 19, Article 100604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100604

Vu, J. A., Han, M., & Buell, M. J. (2015). The effects of in-service training on teachers’ beliefs and practices in children’s play. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2015.1087144

Wellington, P., Thomas, I., Powell, I., & Clarke, B. (2002). Authentic assessment applied to engineering and business undergraduate consulting teams. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(2), 168–179.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-23

Issue

Section

Articles