Supplier's selection of plate material using analytical hierarchy process and additive ratio assessment methods

Authors

  • Ja'iza Salsabila Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
  • Dira Ernawati Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/ijio.v4i2.8127

Keywords:

AHP, ARAS, Dickson's Criteria, Supplier Selection

Abstract

PT PAL Indonesia (PERSERO) is among the prominent shipyard companies in Indonesia that currently employs a simplistic supplier selection weighting system, prioritizing low prices and material specification conformity. This approach often leads to subjective assessments, making it challenging for the company to identify suitable suppliers from a large pool. Therefore, this study proposed a methodology to enhance supplier selection by incorporating additional criteria based on Dickson's criteria and company policies. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) methods were utilized for this purpose. The findings indicate that PT Krakatau Steel (A1) emerges as the top-ranked supplier with a Ki value of 0.19, followed by PT Diansakti Sejahtera (A5) in second place with a Ki value of 0.157, and PT Gunawan Dianjaya Steel (A3) in third place with a Ki value of 0.152. PT Jastindo Raya (A4) secures the fourth position with a Ki value of 0.151, while PT Gunung Raja Paksi (A2) takes the fifth and final spot with a Ki value of 0.15. This research helps the company effectively select the best suppliers, particularly in the procurement sector, by employing the AHP-ARAS method and considering Dickson's criteria, thereby addressing existing gaps the company encounters.

References

M. Rahman, A. B. M. M. Bari, S. Mithun, and A. Taghipour, “Resources , Conservation & Recycling Advances Sustainable supplier selection in the textile dyeing industry : An integrated multi-criteria decision analytics approach,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. Adv., vol. 15, no. September, p. 200117, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200117

F. P. Mulya and R. Rusindiyanto, “Pemilihan Supplier Bahan Baku Rajungan Menggunakan Metode Ahp (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Dan Aras (Additive Ratio Assessment) Di Pt. Xyz,” Juminten, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 119–130, 2021, Available online at: https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/2231536

L. M. Ellram and M. L. Ueltschy, "Supply chain management in industrial marketing – Relationships matter," Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 79, pp. 36–45, Mar. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.03.007

N. Jahani, A. Sepehri, H. R. Vandchali, and E. B. Tirkolaee, “Application of industry 4.0 in the procurement processes of supply chains: A systematic literature review,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 1–25, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147520.

R. Ali, S. Ashiquzzaman, and S. Ahmed, “A decision support system for classifying supplier selection criteria using machine learning and random forest approach,” Decis. Anal. J., vol. 7, pp. 100238, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100238.

F. X. Libianto, “Pemilihan alternatif pemasok bahan baku menggunakan pendekatan multi kriteria dengan metode PROMETHEE (PT. XYZ),” Jurnal Terapan Teknik Industri, vol. 04 , no. 2, pp. 227-236, Nov. 2023, doi : https://doi.org/10.37373/jenius.v4i2.556.

H. T. Adikoro and F. Wurjaningrum, “Analisis Pemilihan Supplier Kain Byemi Official Store Dengan Metode Fuzzy AHP dan Fuzzy Topsis,” J. Manaj. dan Perbank., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 38–53, 2022, doi : https://doi.org/10.55963/jumpa.v9i2.458.

P. Samaranayake, S. Nagalingam, and T. Laosirihongthong, “Supplier Selection and Ranking Towards Sustainable Procurement with Multiple Decision Makers,” IEEE Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag., vol. 2, pp. 906–910, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978888.

W. D. Pratama, Y. R. Sianturi, A. P. Silaen, I. H. Sitorus, and B. A. H. Siboro, “Pemilihan Supplier Lampu Uv Dalam Pembuatan Box Sterilization Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process,” J. Ilm. Tek. Ind., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 158, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.24912/jitiuntar.v9i2.10542.

M. Rani, R. Ardiansyah, and D. Christina, “Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan supplier cosmetic dengan metode weighted product,” JRTI (Jurnal Ris. Tindakan Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 77, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.29210/3003848000.

J. Gidiagba, L. Tartibu, and M. Okwu, “ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Sustainable supplier selection in the oil and gas industry : An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 217, no. 2022, pp. 1243–1255, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.323.

A. Rasmussen, H. Sabic, S. Saha, and I. E. Nielsen, “Supplier selection for aerospace & defense industry through MCDM methods,” Clean. Eng. Technol., vol. 12, no. June 2022, pp. 100590, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100590.

C. Bhowmik, S. Gangwar, and S. Bhowmik, "Optimum Selection of Energy-Efficient Material : A MCDM-Based Distance Approach Evaluation of Mixed Data," in Springer Singapore, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8049-4_3

S. B. Bhosale, S. Bhowmik, and A. Ray, “Multi Criteria Decision Making for Selection of Material Composition for Powder Metallurgy Process,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 4615–4620, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.032.

S. S. Goswami and D. K. Behera, “Implementation of ENTROPY-ARAS decision making methodology in the selection of best engineering materials,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 38, pp. 2256–2262, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.320.

M. Marzouk and E. M. Abdelakder, “On the use of multi-criteria decision making methods for minimizing environmental emissions in construction projects,” Decis. Sci. Lett., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 373–392, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.5267/j.dsl.2019.6.002.

V. K. Koganti, N. Menikonda, S. P. Anbuudayasankar, T. Krishnaraj, R. K. Athhukuri, and M. S. Vastav, “GRAHP TOP model for supplier selection in Supply Chain: A hybrid MCDM approach,” Decis. Sci. Lett., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 65–80, 2019, doi:https://doi.org/ 10.5267/j.dsl.2018.5.002.

B. Masoomi, I. G. Sahebi, M. Fathi, F. Yıldırım, and S. Ghorbani, “Strategic supplier selection for renewable energy supply chain under green capabilities (fuzzy BWM-WASPAS-COPRAS approach),” Energy Strateg. Rev., vol. 40, no. January, p. 100815, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.esr.2022.100815.

J. Li, H. Fang, and W. Song, “Sustainable supplier selection based on SSCM practices: A rough cloud TOPSIS approach,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 222, pp. 606–621, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.070.

J. E. Leal, “AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method,” MethodsX, vol. 7, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021.

F. Ecer, “A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 143, pp. 110916, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110916.

H. Hamria and A. Azwar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Aparatur Desa Menggunakan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (Aras) Pada Kantor Desa Kotaraja,” Simtek J. Sist. Inf. dan Tek. Komput., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.51876/simtek.v6i1.96.

K. Yilmaz, E. Yüce, and A. Özdağoğlu, “An Integration of HF-AHP and ARAS Techniques in Supplier Selection: A Case Study in Waste Water Treatment Facility,” Dokuz Eylul Univ. Iktis. ve Idari Bilim. Derg., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 477–497, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.24988/deuiibf.2018332744.

Y. K. Fu, “An integrated approach to catering supplier selection using AHP-ARAS-MCGP methodology,” J. Air Transp. Manag., vol. 75, no. November 2018, pp. 164–169, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.01.011.

A. A. Suryani and D. Ernawati, “Pemilihan Mitra Kerja Pemanfaatan Limbah Jonjot Menggunakan Metode Aras (Additive Ratio Assessment) Di Perum Xyz,” Juminten, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 37–48, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.33005/juminten.v1i4.104.

S. S. Goswami and D. K. Behera, “Solving Material Handling Equipment Selection Problems in an Industry with the Help of Entropy Integrated COPRAS and ARAS MCDM techniques,” In Process Integr. Optim. Sustain., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 947–973, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-021-00192-5.

F. Abastante, S. Corrente, S. Greco, A. Ishizaka, and I. M. Lami, “A new parsimonious AHP methodology: Assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 127, pp. 109–120, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.036.

T. Baroto and D. M. Utama, “Integrasi ahp dan saw untuk penyelesaian green supplier selection,” SENTRA Semin. Nas. Teknol. dan Rekayasa, pp. 38–44, 2020, doi : https://doi.org/10.22219/sentra.v0i6.3895.

B. Güneri and M. Deveci, “Evaluation of supplier selection in the defense industry using q-rung orthopair fuzzy set based EDAS approach,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 222, no. March, p. 119846, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119846.

L. Coffey and D. Claudio, “In defense of group fuzzy AHP : A comparison of group fuzzy AHP and group AHP with confidence intervals,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 178, no. April, p. 114970, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114970.

S. B. Tv, P. Iman, S. Putra, I. Husni, and A. Amin, “Implementasi Metode AHP Untuk Menentukan Pilihan,” vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 15–28, 2022, doi : https://doi.org/10.33365/jtk.v16i2.1564.

J. Simon, A. Adamu, A. Abdulkadir, and A. S. Henry, “Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Prioritizing Alternative Strategies for Malaria Control Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) Model for Prioritizing Alternative Strategies for Malaria Control,” 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2019/v5i130124.

K. Kraugusteeliana, A. Subagiyo, and F. Setyawan, “Pemilihan Jenis Obat Terbaik Untuk Gejala Batuk Remaja dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP dan ARAS,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 2172, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.30865/jurikom.v9i6.5235.

E. Purba and H. T. Sihotang, “Decision Support System For Prospective Recipients Of The Healthy Indonesia Card (Kis) In The Village Of Bah Sidua Dua With The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method,” J. Mantik, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 82–90, 2019. Available at: http://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/view/320.

K. Xu and J. Xu, “A direct consistency test and improvement method for the analytic hierarchy process,” Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 359–388, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-020-09323-y.

Y. Liu, C. M. Eckert, and C. Earl, “Expert Systems with Applications A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 161, pp. 113738, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738.

B. Andika and R. Kustini, “Pemilihan Anggota Tim Sub Bagian Administrasi Ketarunaan Dan Alumni Menggunakan Metode ARAS,” vol. 2, pp. 209–218, 2023, doi : https://doi.org/10.53513/jursi.v2i2.5348.

H. Karimi and Z. Nikkhah-Farkhani, “Performance Appraisal of Knowledge Workers Using Augmented Additive Ratio Assessment (A-ARAS) Method: A Case Study,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 2285–2295, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3009134.

J. Hutagalung, D. Nofriansyah, and M. A. Syahdian, “Penerimaan Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai (BPNT) Menggunakan Metode ARAS,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 198, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v6i1.3478.

M. Ghram and H. Frikha, “Multiple criteria hierarchy process within ARAS method,” 2019 6th Int. Conf. Control. Decis. Inf. Technol. CoDIT 2019, pp. 995–1000, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CoDIT.2019.8820401.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-11

How to Cite

Salsabila, J. ., & Ernawati, D. . (2023). Supplier’s selection of plate material using analytical hierarchy process and additive ratio assessment methods . International Journal of Industrial Optimization, 4(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijio.v4i2.8127

Issue

Section

Articles