Jayson Troy Ferro Bajar, Mary Ann Ferro Bajar, Elizabeth P Alarcon


Out-of-field teaching continues to be a persisting problem in the Philippine educational system – similarly evident in the rural school where this study was conducted. As an intervention, the researchers organized a professional learning community in the form of a school learning action cell (SLAC) to provide assistance to the teachers. They were then interviewed to determine the perceived effects of the intervention. Results of the study revealed that SLAC sessions contribute to the general well-being of the teachers in their view of the profession as it ‘reduced their tasks’ and ‘promoted workplace collaboration.’ On the other hand, it also impacted their pedagogy, which was found to have contributed to their ‘instructional mastery’ and ‘teacher efficacy.’ The researchers, however, caution that, though the intervention was found to be successful, it should be taken in its suggestive nature when out-of-field teaching is unavoidable. When feasible, the idyllic educational landscape should assign teachers according to their respective specialized fields.


Out-of-field teaching; Philippine education; Professional learning community; Rural education; School learning action cell

Full Text:



Benson, P. (2011). What’s new in autonomy? The Language Teacher, 35(4), 15.

Binauhan, R. C. (2019). Learning Action Cell Implementation In The Public Elementary Schools In The Division Of Cavite. 3(11), 27–33.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Carroll, T. G., Fulton, K., & Doerr, H. (2010). Team up for the 21st century teaching and learning: What research and practice reveal about professional learning.

Cartilla, E. J., & Rondina, J. Q. (2020). Enhancing teachers’ pedagogical practice in Mathematics through 5E model focused inquiry-based learning (IBL) on learning action cell (LAC) session. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 416–419.

Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1991). Principles for the practice of collaboration in schools. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 35(4), 6–9.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. In Qualitative Health Research. SAGE Publications, Inc.

David, C. C., & Ducanes, G. (2018). Teacher education in the Philippines: Are we meeting the demand for quantity and quality? (No. 18–002; Center for Integrative and Development Studies - University of the Philppines).

Davis, K. S. (2003). “Change is hard”: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87(1), 3–30.

de Jong, L., Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2019). School-based teacher collaboration: Different learning opportunities across various contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102925.

Degan, J. (2018). Stronger together: A case for team teaching in the elementary school setting [Dominican University of California].

Dela Cruz, C. M. (2018). School learning action cell (SLAC) and its effect on elementary teachers’ effectiveness in Bagumbayan District I [Mindanao State University - General Santos City].

DeMatthews, D. (2014). Principal and teacher collaboration: An exploration of distributed leadership in professional learning communities. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 2(2), 176–206.

DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., Many, T., & Mattos, M. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (3rd ed.). Solution Tree.

Dufour, R., & Marzano, R. J. (2011). Leaders of learning : How district, school, and classroom leaders improve student achievement. In Leading Professional Learning Communities. Solution Tree.

Dutta, V., & Sahney, S. (2016). School leadership and its impact on student achievement. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 941–958.

Feger, S., & Arruda, E. (2008). Professional learning communities: Key themes from the literature.

Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Sook Kim, E., & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy: Beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530.

Gumban, H. (2019). School-based learnong action cell (SLAC) activities: A tool to enhance work performance of teachers in Norala districts [Mindanao State University - General Santos City].

Humada-Ludeke, A. (2013). The creation of a professional learning community for school leaders. Sense Publishers.

Jensen, L. (2002). Planning lessons. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 403–413). Heinle & Heinle.

Lai, E. (2011). Collaboration: A literature review.

Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education.

Little, J. W. (2002). Professional community and the problem of high school reform. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 693–714.

Madigan, J. C., & Scroth-Cavataio, G. (2011). IDEIA 2004: Building collaborative partnerships and effective communication between administrators, special and general educators, and multidisciplinary professionals. Principal Leadership, 12(3), 26–30.

Pacana, N. M. S., Ramos, C. D., Catarata, M. N., & Inocian, R. B. (2019). Out-of-field social studies teaching through sustainable culture-based pedagogy: A Filipino perspective. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 230–241.

Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership: Policy and practice. OECD Publishing.

Reeves, P. M., Pun, W. H., & Chung, K. S. (2017). Influence of teacher collaboration on job satisfaction and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 227–236.

Rey, E. (2000). Factors affecting the efficiency of the LAC for grades 1 and 2 teachers in the Division of Masbate. Bicol University, Legazpi, Philippines.

Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S. O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475–514.

Sai, X., & Siraj, S. (2015). Professional learning community in education: Literature review. The Online Journal of Quality in Higher Education, 2(2), 65–78.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059–1069.

Slick, S. (2002). Teachers are enthusiastic participants in a learning community. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 75(4), 198–201.

Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258.

Sutton, P. S., & Shouse, A. W. (2016). Building a culture of collaboration in schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(7), 69–73.

Tomacruz, S. (2018, September). Teachers complain of ‘excessive’ workload; DepEd says these are ‘legal, necessary.’ Rappler.

Vega, M. G. (2020). Investigating the learning action cell (LAC) experiences of Science teachers in secondary schools: A multiple case study. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(1), 20–27.

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.

Watson, C. (2014). Effective professional learning communities?: The possibilities for teachers as agents of change in schools. British Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 18–29.

Williams, R., Brien, K., & LeBlanc, J. (2012). Transforming schools into learning organizations: Supports and barriers to educational reforms. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 134, 1–32.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


IJEMI (International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation)


ISSN 2721-933X (print) | 2716-2338 (online)
Organized by Educational Management
Published by Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Website :
Email :


View IJEMI Stats
Creative Commons License
International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at