Integration of Intended Learning Outcomes (ILO) and Course Learning Outcomes (CLO) Real Analysis: An Evaluative Study in the Framework of Outcome-Based Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v7i1.14967Keywords:
Curriculum evaluation, course learning outcomes, itended learning outcomes, outcome-based education, real analysisAbstract
Background. Outcome-Based Education (OBE) requires strong alignment between Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) and Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) to ensure that graduate competencies are systematically achieved. This study evaluates the extent to which ILO–CLO integration is realised in the Real Analysis course of the Mathematics Education Study Programme.
Methods. Using a descriptive evaluative approach, data were obtained through analysis of Semester Learning Plans (SLPs), assessment instruments, student learning outcomes, and interviews with course lecturers. Using assessment data, curriculum documents, and cognitive-level analysis, the study finds that ILO achievement is generally high, with most indicators exceeding 70%.
Results. CLO performance shows a varied pattern: students demonstrate strong mastery in Sub-CLO 01 and Sub-CLO 04, particularly in topics with clear procedural structure, such as real number construction and basic calculus. However, achievement in Sub-CLO 03, which covers limits and continuity, remains moderate, indicating difficulties in higher-order reasoning aligned with the expected C5 cognitive level. These results reveal a gap between intended evaluative competencies and the predominantly procedural nature of current assessments.
Conclusion. The study recommends integrating more authentic, conceptual, and reasoning-based evaluation methods—such as project or portfolio assessments—to better support deep learning and reflective mathematical thinking.
References
Ajjawi, R., Rees, C., & Boud, D. (2024). From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice.
Alyasin, A. (2023). Assessing learning outcomes in higher education: Mapping learning outcomes to assessment. TEM Journal, 12(4), 1593–1604.
Asbari, M., & Nurhayati, W. (2024). Outcomes-Based Education in Indonesian Higher Education: Empowering Students’ Learning Competencies. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v5i5.445
Auras, R., et al. (2023). Mapping class learning outcomes of the core curriculum to university learning goals at Michigan State University's School of Packaging. Perspectives in Teaching & Learning (Wiley). https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2712
Bickerton, R. T., & Sangwin, C. (2020). Practical online assessment of mathematical proof. arXiv:2006.01581.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Davies, B. (2022). Comparative judgement, proof summaries, and proof comprehension. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology / Research in Mathematics Education (Springer).
Directorate General of Higher Education. (2020). Guidelines for the preparation of learning outcomes for study program graduates. Ministry of Education and Culture.
Handayani, N. U., Wibowo, M. A., Christiani, S. D. K., & Ulkhaq, M. M. (2024). Implementation of Outcome-Based Education from the perception of lecturers and students. Journal of Education Technology, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v8i3.76621
Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-based education: The future is today. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 625–629.
Hasibuan, J. (2024). Integrating an outcome-based education (OBE) framework in higher education. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 1–12.
Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO). (2015). Learning Outcomes Assessment: A Practical Guide for Educators. HEQCO.
Hodds, M. (2014). Self-explanation training improves proof comprehension. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 62–96.
Karyanto, Y., Asmaul, R., Roziqi, Z. F. M., Junaidi, A., & Sabur, F. (2025). Evaluating the dynamic alignment of higher education curriculum with the evolving industry landscape: a multi-dimensional analysis in the context of Indonesia. International Journal of Teaching and Learning.
Kristianto, H. (2021). Design of student and course learning outcomes measurement in OBE system in Indonesian higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(2), 100–110.
Kushari, B. (2022). A learning outcome assessment information system to support OBE: evidence from Indonesian higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Tinggi, 7(1), 45–62.
Labouta, H. I., et al. (2019). Investigating the alignment of intended, enacted, and experienced curriculum in STEM programs. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 923–942.
Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical reasoning tasks: Lessons from research. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-016-0189-3
Loughlin, C., Lygo-Baker, S., & Lindberg-Sand, Å. (2020). Reclaiming constructive alignment. European Journal of Higher Education, 10 (2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1816197
Mejía-Ramos, J. P., Fuller, E. J., Weber, K., & Samkoff, A. (2012). An assessment model for proof comprehension in undergraduate mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 3–18.
Mufanti, R., Carter, D., & England, N. (2024). Outcomes-based education in Indonesian higher education: Reporting on the understanding, challenges, and support available to teachers. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100873.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100873
Muthmainnah, N., & Setyono, P. (2022). Evaluating curriculum alignment in Indonesian mathematics education programs under OBE framework. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(1), 45–57.
Nordin, N., & Zubairi, A. M. (2015). Outcome-based education: Implementation assessment in higher education. International Education Studies, 8(3), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n3p27
Nuraini, S., & Khasanah, I. (2023). Integration of course learning outcomes and graduate outcomes in mathematics education: Challenges and strategies. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 42(1), 33–47.
Rahman, R.A, Yusof, N., & Hashim, S. (2021). Assessing curriculum alignment in outcome-based education implementation. Journal of Education and Learning, 15(2), 178–188.
Samkoff, A., & kolega (2015). Teaching proof comprehension in undergraduate Real Analysis. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 37, 1–15.
Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. American Association of School Administrators.
Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2016). Research on proof and proving in mathematics education. (book chapter / review)
Suprapto, N., Wahyudi, & Hidayat, R. (2023). Evaluating conceptual alignment in theoretical mathematics courses under OBE framework. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 201–218.
Tall, D. (2004). Building theories: The three worlds of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(1), 29–33.
Tam, D. T. M. (2021). Alignment between course learning outcomes and Bloom’s taxonomy: Cross-disciplinary evidence. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(6), 1–18.
Vlachopoulos, D. (2024). A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (review).
Weber, K. (2015). Effective proof‐reading strategies for comprehending mathematical proofs. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1, 289–314.
Yusof, M., Ismail, M., & Abu, R. (2012). Aligning course learning outcomes with program outcomes: An OBE approach. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 80–87.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Burhanudin Arif Nurnugroho, Nurul Arfinanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UAD. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is identified as to its source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication before acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
Copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above-mentioned paper in whole to UAD. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online), or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors' personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UAD copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UAD endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
