Teachers’ Planning Practices for Deep Learning-Oriented Science Instruction: A Qualitative Case Study in Indonesian Junior High Schools

Authors

  • Kawit Sayoto universitas ahmad dahlan
  • Enung Hasanah Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Muhammad Zuhaery Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v7i1.14694

Keywords:

deep learning, junior High School, pedagogical strategies , science

Abstract

Background. This study investigates the pedagogical strategies employed by junior secondary science teachers in designing deep Learning–oriented instruction on living systems and cells. Deep Learning is defined as an instructional orientation that promotes conceptual understanding, cognitive integration, and higher-order thinking skills.

Methods. Adopting a qualitative case study approach, data were collected from five science teachers across diverse school contexts in Bantul Regency. Empirical evidence was generated through five semi-structured, in-depth interviews conducted between 18-22 July 2025, each lasting 60–90 minutes, complemented by a document analysis of five instructional planning documents, one from each participating teacher. The interviews were guided by a combined curricular and professional noticing framework, enabling systematic examination of teachers’ decision-making processes.

Results. The findings reveal three significant insights. First, Grade VIII science lesson planning aligned with the independent curriculum and deep learning principles is structured to support experiences of conceptual understanding, application, and reflection. Conceptual understanding is facilitated through discussions, multiple learning resources, student projects, and presentations; application is emphasized through real-world case studies; and reflection is integrated through the evaluation of learning outcomes and opportunities for personal improvement. Second, teachers anticipate variations in students’ prior knowledge and tendencies toward passive participation. Third, in response, they adopt an asset-based approach and implement instructional steps to promote mindful, meaningful, reflective engagement that extends beyond traditional cognitive assessment.

Conclusion. Theoretically, this study contributes to the literature on science pedagogical design by demonstrating how professional noticing can function as an analytic lens for understanding teachers’ planning for deep Learning, particularly in contexts transitioning toward competency-based curricula. The findings also extend existing discussions on deep Learning by illustrating how teachers translate curricular expectations into concrete pedagogical decisions within real classroom constraints.

References

Alam, A. (2022). Investigating sustainable education and positive psychology interventions in schools to achieve sustainable happiness and well-being for 21st-century pedagogy and curriculum. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 19481.

Amini, G., Anami, S. F., & Utami, V. N. (2024). Interaksi sains dan agama: Perspektif kimia dalam agama Islam sebagai ilmu pengetahuan dan keimanan. Islamologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan, 1(2), 437–448.

Bergmann, M., Schäpke, N., Marg, O., Stelzer, F., Lang, D. J., Bossert, M., Gantert, M., Häußler, E., Marquardt, E., & Piontek, F. M. (2021). Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for change. Sustainability Science, 16, 541–564.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 5–31.

Bowen, R. S. (2017). Understanding by design. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching.

Council, N. R., Behavioral, D. of, Sciences, S., Education, B. on S., & Standards, C. on a C. F. for N. K.-12 S. E. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Fauziah, F. M. (2022). Systematic literature review: Bagaimanakah pembelajaran IPA berbasis keterampilan proses sains yang efektif meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis? Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa, 12(3), 455–463.

Fullan, M. (2013). Stratosphere: Integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 62(4), 429–432.

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep Learning.

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2017). Deep Learning: Engage the world, change the world. Corwin Press.

Gamoran Sherin, M., & Van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37.

Hasanah, E., Maryani, I., & Gestiardi, R. (2023). Model pembelajaran diferensiasi berbasis digital di sekolah. K-Media.

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. routledge.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on Learning. Routledge.

Hattie, J. A. C., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. Npj Science of Learning, 1(1), 1–13.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based Learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

Hossain, S., O’neill, S., & Strnadová, I. (2023). What constitutes student well-being: A scoping review of students’ perspectives. Child Indicators Research, 16(2), 447–483.

Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.

Mashuri, M., & Hasanah, E. (2021). Manajemen pembelajaran bahasa inggris dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa saat pandemi COVID-19 di SMA Muhammadiyah 3 Yogyakarta. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 4(2), 227–234.

McTighe, J. (2010). Understanding by design and instruction. On Excellence in Teaching, 271–299.

Mehta, J., & Fine, S. (2019). In search of deeper Learning: The quest to remake the American high school. Harvard University Press.

Mutawadia, M., Jawil, J., & Al Farisi, S. (2023). Penerapan metode pembelajaran mendalam sebagai upaya pembentukan karakter siswa. Journal of Instructional and Development Research, 3(6), 279–284.

Pellegrino, J. W. (2017). Teaching, Learning, and assessing 21st century skills.

Quinn, J., McEachen, J., Fullan, M., Gardner, M., & Drummy, M. (2019). Dive into deep Learning: Tools for engagement. Corwin Press.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2021). Expanding on prior conceptualizations of teacher noticing. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(1), 17–27.

Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Ascd.

Yusmar, F., & Fadilah, R. E. (2023). Analisis rendahnya literasi sains peserta didik indonesia: Hasil PISA dan faktor penyebab. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(1), 11–19.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-20

How to Cite

Sayoto, K., Hasanah, E., & Zuhaery, M. (2026). Teachers’ Planning Practices for Deep Learning-Oriented Science Instruction: A Qualitative Case Study in Indonesian Junior High Schools. International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation, 7(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v7i1.14694

Issue

Section

Articles