The Urgency of Digital Literacy in Improving Teacher Performance: A Case Study In Lebak Regency, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v7i1.14684Keywords:
digital literacy, Educational technology, Lebak Regency, teacher performanceAbstract
Background. The rapid development of information and communication technology has transformed the educational landscape, requiring teachers to possess adequate digital literacy skills to optimize the learning process. In Lebak Regency, the diversity of geographical conditions and technological infrastructure raises questions about the extent to which digital literacy affects teacher performance. This study aims to analyze the effect of digital literacy on junior high school teachers’ performance in the region.
Methods. Using a quantitative approach and a correlational survey method, data were collected from 120 purposively sampled teachers representing three geographical zones. The research instrument was validated and tested for reliability before use. Data analysis employed descriptive statistics and simple linear regression.
Results. The results showed that digital literacy had a significant and positive effect on teacher performance, contributing 48.6%. Teachers with high digital literacy demonstrated better abilities in planning, implementing, and evaluating learning activities. Most respondents were in the high digital literacy category, although a small portion remained at a low level, particularly in areas with limited technological access.
Conclusion. This study provides novelty by quantitatively analyzing this relationship within a specific subnational context (Lebak Regency) characterized by significant geographical and infrastructural disparities, a gap often overlooked by previous national-level or urban-focused research. The findings imply a critical need for a dual intervention policy that requires local government to not only improve equitable ICT infrastructure but also design adaptive professional development programs focused on contextual digital pedagogy to bridge the persistent competency gap
References
Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2012). Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.28945/1621
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The Teacher Digital Competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2020). Digital competences for teacher professional development: Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
Fernández-Otoya, F., Cabero-Almenara, J., Pérez-Postigo, G., Bravo, J., Alcázar-Holguin, M. A., & Vilca-Rodríguez, M. (2024). Digital and information literacy in basic-education teachers: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 14(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020127
Getenet, S., Cantle, R., Redmond, P., & Albion, P. (2024). Students’ digital technology attitude, literacy, and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00437-y
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley. https://openlibrary.org/works/OL2627594W/Digital_literacy
Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Examining the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy, their digital competence, and pedagogical use of ICT. Computers & Education, 110, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.008
Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence-An emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4
Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016
International Telecommunication Union. (2022). Facts and Figures 2022. ITU. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/facts-figures-2022/
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29704/
Landa, E., Zhu, C., Sesabo, J., & Machumu, H. (2023). Leader support and the integration of innovative teaching-learning technologies: the mediating role of technological level of knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 15523–15541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11776-8
Ma, X., Liu, Y., & Liu, J. (2022). Linking teachers’ grit to innovative performance: The mediating role of digital competence and the moderating role of perceived organizational support. Computers & Education, 187, 104555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104555
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Nugroho, D. (2021). Literasi digital guru sekolah menengah di daerah 3T: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v6i2.2321
Permendikbud Nomor 16 Tahun 2007. (2007). Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: A longitudinal study. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1251–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.013
Prasetiyo, W. H., Sari, B. I., Saputri, R. N., Mahadir Naidu, N. B., Dewantara, J. A., & Triyanto, T. (2023). Assessing digital competence in Indonesian students: Demographic and internet usage factors through the Rasch model. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135991
Rasdiana, I., Mauludin, I., Yahya, A., Putri, D. E., Machrus, M. A., Marbun, M., Puspitasari, D., & Al-Ghozali, F. (2024). Mediation of digital literacy in investigating the effect of school culture on teacher performance: Implication for educational policy. Journal of Innovation in Psychology and Education, 8(12). https://systems.enpress-publisher.com/index.php/jipd/article/view/9117/0
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Rusydiyah, E. F., Asrohah, H., Basyir, K., Rahman, M. R., & Usagawa, T. (2024). Structural model of digital transformation readiness of Indonesian rural and urban science teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.15294/0qzkre08
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Spante, M., Sofkova, S. S., & Lundin, M. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1519143. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143
Temirkhanova, M., Abildinova, G., & Karaca, C. (2024). Enhancing digital literacy skills among teachers for effective integration of computer science and design education: A case study at Astana International School, Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1408512
Wang, S., Sun, Z., & Chen, Y. (2023). Effects of Higher Education Institutes' Artificial Intelligence Capability on Students' Self-Efficacy, Creativity and Learning Performance. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 4919–4939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11338-4
Yulin, N., & Danso, S. D. (2025). Assessing pedagogical readiness for digital innovation: A mixed-methods study. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15781
Zhang, X., Li, C., & Liu, R. (2022). Constructing a digital competence evaluation framework for in-service teachers’ online teaching. Sustainability, 14(9), 5268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095268
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00170
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdul Karim, Sudadio Sudadio, Dase Erwin Juansah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UAD. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is identified as to its source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication before acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
Copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above-mentioned paper in whole to UAD. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online), or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors' personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UAD copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UAD endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
