The Views of Thai Buddhist Monks on a Good Death

Authors

  • Bumpenchit Sangchart Khon Kaen University
  • Suksan Promdee Ngamgam Khon Kaen University
  • Rawat Ekwuttiwongsa Khon Kaen University
  • Monthida Sangruangake Khon Kaen University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/dpphj.v14i2.2827

Keywords:

good death, sick buddhist monks, karma, phenomenology, trustworthiness

Abstract

Background:When Buddhist monks were sick, they had to take care of themselves, or they will be taken care of by other monks. The care may be provided until they recover from the illness or throughout life. The monks who are the caregivers go through near-death and death experiences. The purpose of this phenomenological study was to investigate the meanings of a good death based on the experience of 13 Thai Buddhist monks that providing care for the sick monks until the sick monks passed away. Method:Purposeful sampling was used to select participants who voluntarily participated in the study. In-depth interviews were the main methods of data gathering. Established trustworthiness of a qualitative inquiry based on quality criteria of Lincoln and Guba. The methodological interpretations of Diekelmann and Allen established the thematic analysis of this study. Results:Six main themes and six subthemes of a good death emerged from participants which formed the basis of the findings reported: (a) free from suffering, consisting of 1) death without life's restraints, 2) peaceful death, and 3) death as a sleeping person (but not awake); (b) natural death with good deeds; (c) awareness of death, composed of (1) accepting death, (2) preparation before death, and (3) letting things go; (d) last spirituality becoming a mental charity; (e) resting in peace; and (f) nirvana.  Conclusion: The results of the present study could fulfill and extend the meanings of good death to a wider and deeper which are different from the previous studies.

Author Biographies

Bumpenchit Sangchart, Khon Kaen University

Adult Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing

Suksan Promdee Ngamgam, Khon Kaen University

Division of Nursing, Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine

Rawat Ekwuttiwongsa, Khon Kaen University

Division of Nursing, Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine

Monthida Sangruangake, Khon Kaen University

Adult Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing

References

1. KA Kehl. Moving toward peace: an analysis of the concept of a good death. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care 2006; 23, 277-86.
2. T Watts. End-of-life care pathways as tools to promote and support a good death: a critical commentary. Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl) 2012; 21, 20-30.
3. T Hughes, M Schumacher, JM Jacobs–Lawson and S Arnold. Confronting death: perceptions of a good death in adults with lung cancer. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care 2008; 25, 39-44.
4. K Hirai, M Miyashita, T Morita, M Sanjo and Y Uchitomi. Good death in Japanese cancer care: a qualitative study. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 2006; 31,140-7.
5. KE Steinhauser, NA Christakis, EC Clipp, M McNeilly, L McIntyre and JA Tulsky. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000; 284, 2476-82.
6. JM Teno, VA Casey, LC Welch and S Edgman-Levitan. Patient- focused, family-centered end-of-life medical care: views of the guidelines and bereaved family members. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 2001; 22, 738-5.
7. E Tong, SA McGraw, E Dobihal, R Baggish, E Cherlin and EH Bradley. What is a good death? Minority and non-minority perspectives. J. Palliat. Care 2003; 19, 168-75.
8. JD De Jong and LE Clarke. What is a good death? Stories from palliative care. J. Palliat. Care 2009; 25, 61-7.
9. PA Singer, DK Martin and M Kelner. Quality end of-life care: Patients’ perspectives. JAMA. 1999; 281, 163-8.
10. M Miyashita, T Morita, K Sato, K Hirai, Y Shima and Y Uchitomi. Factors contributing to evaluation of a good death from the bereaved family member’s perspective. Psychooncology. 2008a; 17, 612-20.
11. M Miyashita, T Morita, K Sato, K Hirai, Y Shima and Y Uchitomi. Good death inventory: a measure for evaluating good death from the bereaved family member’s perspective. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 2008b; 35, 486-98.
12. S Piyawattanapong. 2009, Development of palliative care for person with terminal cancer in tertiarycare hospital, Ph. D. Dissertation. Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
13. Y Jompaeng and B Sangchart. Nurses’ perception of good death: A phenomenology study. Journal of Nursing Science and Health (in Thai), Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 2013; 36, 49-59.
14. W Khoonsongkiat. Patients’ perceptions of good death. Journal of Nursing Science (in Thai), Burapha University, Chonburi, 2001; 19, 1-12.
15. J Rodpal. 2006, Good death: perspectives from Thai Buddhist elderly, Master Degree. Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
16. P Mapong and B Sangchart. Evaluation of palliative care in critically ill patient: family members’ perspectives. Journal of Nursing Science and Health (in Thai), Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 2013; 36, 17-35.
17. W Thammachitto, Phra. Caring for monks in the hospital. Available at: https://www.nationalhealth.or.th/sites/default/files/upload_files/Care_for_sick_monks.pdf, accessed July 2018.
18. T Nakata. Buddhism and Thai society (in Thai). 2nd ed. Sahai Block & Printing Ltd. Bangkok, 2000.
19. S Ragkhanto, A Khongkhuntod and S Kanchana. Self-care behavior of monks in the upper southern region (inThai). Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, Surat Thani, 2008.
20. D Buathed. 2010, Buddhist monks’ health: a model of holistic health care by community participation in upper central Thailand, Ph. D. dissertation. Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand.
21. M Van Manen. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 1990.
22. N Diekelmann and D Allen. A hermeneutic analysis of the NLN criteria for the appraisal of baccalaureate programs. In Diekelmann N, Allen D and Tanner C (eds.). The NLN criteria for the appraisal of baccalaureate programs: A critical hermeneutic analysis. National League for Nursing, New York, 1989, p. 11–31.
23. YS Lincoln and EG Guba. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage publications, Newbury park, California, 1985.
24. EJ Emanuel and LL Emanuel. The promise of a good death. Lancet. 1998; 351(suppl. II), 21-9.
25. National Health Commission Office. National strategic plan on health promotion at the end of life, 2014-2015(in Thai). 2nd ed. Sam-dee Printing Equipment Company Limited, Bangkok, 2014.
26. T Akechi, M Miyashita, T Morita, T Okuyama, M Sakamoto, R Sagawa and Y Uchitomi. Good death in elderly adults with cancer in Japan based on perspectives of the general population. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2012; 60, 271-6.
27. S Iranmanesh, H Hosseini and M Esmaili. Evaluating the "good death" concept from Iranian bereaved family members' perspective. J. Support Oncol. 2011; 9, 59-63.
28. C Griggs. Community nurses’ perceptions of a good death: A qualitative exploratory study. Int. J. Palliat. Nurs. 2010; 16, 140-9.
29. C Granda-Cameron and A Houldin. Concept analysis of good death in terminally ill patients. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care 2012; 29, 632-9.
30. T Kerdkaew. Buddhist philosophy: perspectives of realistic world and life (in Thai). Commercial Word Media, Samutprakarn, 2010.
31. R Exwuttiwongsa and B Sangchart. Spirituality of sick Buddhist monks. Journal of Nursing Science and Health (in Thai), Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 2012; 35, 100-10.
32. Buddhadasa Bhikkhu. Nirvana here and now (in Thai). Phetpraguy, Bangkok, 2006.
33. Phra Bhramagunabhorn (PA Payutto). Buddha-Dhamma, revised and expanded Version (in Thai). 32th ed. n.p., Bangkok, 2012.
34. Buddhadasa Bhikkhu. Heartwood of the Bodhi Tree: The Buddha’s Teachings on Voidness (in Thai). Thammasapa, Bangkok, 2015.
35. Phra Dhammapitaka (PA Payutto). Mental state of nirvana. Available at: http://www.nkgen.com/22.htm, accessed July 2018.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-30

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2020): Disease Prevention and Public Health Journal

Section

Articles

License

Authors transfer the copyright and grant the Disease Prevention and Public Health Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Disease Prevention and Public Health Journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Disease Prevention and Public Health Journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.