Commuting Mobility as Risk Factor for Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever in Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Authors

  • Tri Wulandari Kesetyaningsih Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta
  • Siti Fajrini Amir Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta
  • Yeni Rahma Desty Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/dpphj.v14i2.2526

Keywords:

dengue hemorrhagic fever, circular mobility, commuting mobility, risk factor

Abstract

Background:In Indonesia, there has been a change in the age group of dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) patient population from children to adults since 1998. It raises the suspicion that an infection occurs not only in residential area but also from other places as a result of human mobility. Research on the role of people mobility as a risk factor for dengue incidence yielded different results. This study aims to reveal the relationship between human mobility and the incidence of dengue. Method: This is a case-control study that involved 276 respondents; 138 were sufferers (case group) while the other 138 respondents were non-sufferers (control group). The sample size was determined by using purposive sampling. Patient’s data and their addresses were obtained from Sleman Regency Health Office while the control group was patient’s neighbors. The people mobility data were obtained by conducting questionnaires that were divided into three categories, namely low, moderate, and high for commuting mobility and two categories, namely traveling outside and inside province for circular mobility. Chi-square analysis was used to determine whether mobility was a risk factor for DHF. Results:The result showed that commuting mobility was correlated with the DHF incidence (p=0.001) where the high mobility of 3.169 times raised the risk of DHF incidence (OR 3.169; 95% CI: 1.690-5.944) more than the low mobility. However, the DHF incidence was not correlated with moderate mobility (p=0,821). Furthermore, traveling outside the Yogyakarta Province reduced the risk by 6.175 times than non-traveling activity (p=0.000; OR 6.175; 95% CI: 2.759-13.822). Conclusion: The commuting mobility outside the village is a risk factor of DHF. Meanwhile, traveling outside Yogyakarta Province did not cause any risk for DHF and it instead tended to reduce the risk.

Author Biographies

Tri Wulandari Kesetyaningsih, Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta

Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science

Siti Fajrini Amir, Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta

Faculty of Medicine and Health Science

Yeni Rahma Desty, Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta

Faculty of Medicine and Health Science

References

1. Karyanti MR, CunoUSPM, Kusriastuti R, Hadinegoro SR, MaroeskaRM, and Hans H, et al. The Changing Incidence of Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever in Indonesia: A 45-Year Registry-Based Analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2014;14(412):1-7.
2. Tangsathapornpong A,Puriburt C, and Bunjoungmanee P. Epidemiology of Dengue at Thammasat University Hospital during 2006-2015. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2017;48(1):39-46.
3. Barmak DH, Dorso CO, Otero M.Modelling dengue epidemic spreading with human mobility. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.Elsevier. 2016;447:129-140.
4. Kim, M., Painib, D. and Jurdaka, R. Modeling stochastic processes in disease spread across a heterogeneous social system. PNAS. 2019;116(2):401–406.
5. Struchiner CJ, Rocklöv J, Wilder-Smith A, Massad E. Increasing Dengue Incidence in Singapore over the Past 40 Years: Population Growth, Climate and Mobility. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):1-14.
6. Wesolowskia A, Qureshic, Bonid MF, Sundsøyc PR, Johanssonb MA, Rasheedg SB, Engø-Monsenc K, Buckeea CO.Impact of human mobility on the emergence of dengue epidemics in Pakistan. PNAS. 2015;112(38):11887–11892.
7. FalcoÂn-Lezama JA, Santos-Luna R,RomaÂn-PeÂrez S, MartõÂnez-Vega RA, Herrera-Valdez MA, Kuri-MoralesAÂ F, et al. Analysis of spatial mobility in subjects from a Dengue endemic urban locality in Morelos State, Mexico. PLoS ONE.2017;12(2):1-19.
8. Bräuchler,B. Changing patterns of mobility, citizenship and conflict inIndonesia. Social Identities.2017;23(4):446-461.
9. Sche´eleS, and Andersson G. City attraction and commuter mobility in urban Sweden: An analysis based on longitudinal population data. Urban Studies. 2018;55(9):1875–1903.
10. Cisani, M.High school commuters. Sustainability education onstudents’ mobility behaviours and perceptions of theireveryday landscape.Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography. 2017;2(6):55-68.
11. Putrawan IW, dan Sari NP. Mobilitas Non Permanen Menjadi Pilihan Sebagian Pekerjadalam Menghadapi Himpitan Ekonomi di Wilayah Denpasar,Badung, Gianyar dan Tabanan Provinsi Bali 2014. Piramida, 2015;11(2):59-67.[Indonesia]
12. Barranco-Ruiz Y, Guevara-Paz AX, Ramírez-Vélez R, Chillón P and Villa-González E. Mode of Commuting to School and Its Association with Physical Activity and Sedentary Habits in Young Ecuadorian Students.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health.2018;15(12):1-12.
13. Dinkes Provinsi DIY. Profil Kesehatan DIY tahun 2017. Available 19 September 2019 at http://www.depkes.go.id/resources/download/profil/PROFIL_KES_PROVINSI_2017/14_DIY_2017.pdf [Indonesia]
14. Kesetyaningsih TW, Andarini S., Sudarto and Pramoedyo H., 2018. Determination of Environmental Factors Affecting Dengue Incidence in Sleman District, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Afr., J. Infect. Dis. 2018;12(1):13-25.
15. BPS of Sleman Regency. 2018. Sleman Regency in Figures 2018.<https://slemankab.bps.go.id/publication/2018/08/16/aa71d0b4c2f5a3a79bbe9583/kabupaten-sleman-dalam-angka-2018.html> Accessed 4 March 2019.
16. Saraswati LPC, dan Mulyantari NK. Prevalensi Demam Berdarah Dengue (DBD) Primer dan Sekunder Berdasarkan Hasil Pemeriksaan Serologis di Rumah Sakit Balimed Denpasar. MedikaUdayana. 2017;6(8):1-6.
17. Sun J, Lua L, Wua H, Yanga J, Xua L, Sangc S, Liua Q. Epidemiological trends of dengue in mainland China, 2005–2015. International Journal of Infectious Diseases; 2017;57:86-91.
18. Chang C-J, Chen CS, Tien C-J, Lu M-R. Epidemiological, clinical and climatic characteristics of dengue fever in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan with implication for prevention and control. PLoS ONE, 2018;13(1):1-15.
19. Ratanawong P, Kittayapong P, Olanratmanee P, Wilder-Smith A, Byass P, Tozan Y, et al. Spatial Variations in Dengue Transmission in Schools in Thailand. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9): 1-16.
20. Cisani, M.High school commuters. Sustainability education on students’ mobility behaviours and perceptions of their everyday landscape. Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography (J-READING), 2017;6(2):55-68.
21. Priyono, CA.,Umrotun, AIW., and Suliadi S. Statistical Mobility Pattern Of Solo-Yogyakarta Commuter Workers by Prambanan Express Train. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 2019;8(9):139-146
22. Telle O, Vaguet A, Yadav NK, Lefebvre B, Daudé E, Paul RE, et al. The Spread of Dengue in an Endemic Urban Milieu–The Case of Delhi, India. PLoS ONE, 2016;11(1):1-17.
23. Siregar D, Djadja IM, and Arminsih R. Analysis of the Risk Factors of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) in Rural Populations in Panongan Subdistrict, Tangerang 2016. in The 1st International Conference on Global Health.KnE Life Sciences. 2017:119–128.
24. Ren H, Wu W, Li T, Yang Z. Urban villages as transfer stations for dengue fever epidemic: A case study in the Guangzhou, China. PLoSNegl Trop Dis. 2019;13(4):1-17.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-30