Contraceptive Method Preference among Conditional Cash Transfer Beneficiaries in Indonesia

Authors

  • Ratna Frenty Nurkhalim Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Bhakti Wiyata Kediri
  • Indah Susilowati Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Bhakti Wiyata Kediri
  • Krisnita Dwi Jayanti Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Bhakti Wiyata Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/dpphj.v14i1.1803

Keywords:

conditional cash transfer, unmet need, program keluarga harapan

Abstract

Background: Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) or known as Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) in Indonesia is a potential program to improve health outcomes, especially reproductive health. This program targeted women from the poor as its beneficiaries. The beneficiaries of this program should visit selected the primary health care to have antenatal care as if they are pregnant. Also, they have to do the growth monitoring regularly if they have children under six. Some studies have found that poor people have a higher risk of unmet need compared to the group with better economies. Could this poor group have a high level of unmet need?. Method:  A Cross-sectional study of 172 women which all CCT beneficiaries interviewed using a structured questionnaire. We gathered socio-demographic data and the using of contraception from the respondent. The data were analyzed using descriptive method. Results: Contraceptives practice among CCT beneficiaries is relatively high (89.6%) and unmet need for limiting childbirth was 4.1% higher than Indonesia unmet need in 2017.  Most respondents preferred using pills and injection than any other method and procured it from primary healthcare centre and local/village midwife for free. Conclusion: Pills and injection method were mostly chosen by the respondent. The total unmet need (for limiting) was slightly lower than Indonesia unmet need in 2012. It seems that these CCT beneficiaries don’t meet an obstacle to access contraception. The unmet need for spacing somehow needs further investigation.

Author Biography

Ratna Frenty Nurkhalim, Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Bhakti Wiyata Kediri

Maternal and Child Health

References

1. Dirjen Perlindungan dan Jaminan Sosial Kementerian Sosial RI. Pengetahuan & Kebijakan Program Keluarga Harapan Tahun 2019. Dalam: acara Rapat Koordinasi Nasional PKH (2019). 2019.
2. Kemensos RI. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Program Keluarga Harapan Tahun 2019. 2018.
3. Kemensos RI. Modul Kesehatan & Gizi Pertemuan Peningkatan KemamPuan Keluarga (P2K2) Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH): Panduan Teknis Pelaksanaan P2K2. 2018.
4. Piane GM. Maternal Mortality in Nigeria: A Literature Review. World Medical & Health Policy. 2019;11(1):83–94.
5. National Population and Family Planning Board (BKKBN), Statistics Indonesia (BPS), Ministry of Health, (Kemenkes), and ICF. Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey 2017. BKKBN, BPS, Kemenkes, and ICF; 2018.
6. M. E. Khan AH Aastha Kant, and Moazzam Ali. Conditional and Unconditional Cash Transfers to Improve Use of Contraception in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Studies in Family Planning. 2016;47(4):371–383.
7. Laszlo S Muhammad Farhan Majid, Laetitia Ren_ee. Conditional Cash Transfers, Women’s Empowerment and Reproductive Choices. McGill University; 2019.
8. de Leon RGP Fernanda Ewerling, Suzanne Jacob Serruya, Mariangela F Silveira, Antonio Sanhueza, Ali Moazzam, Francisco Becerra-Posada, Carolina VN Coll, Franciele Hellwig, Cesar G Victora, Aluisio JD Barros. Contraceptive use in Latin America and the Caribbean with a focus on long-acting reversible contraceptives: prevalence and inequalities in 23 countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(2):227–235.
9. Santibenchakul S Mary Tschann, Alyssa Dee P Carlson, Eric L Hurwitz, Jennifer Salcedo. Promotion of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescents and Young Adults. Journal of Midwifery &Women’s Health. 2018;64(2):194–200.
10. Spagnoletti BRM Linda Rae Bennett, Michelle Kermode &Siswanto Agus Wilopo. ‘The final decision is with the patient’: reproductive modernity and preferences for nonhormonal and non-biomedical contraceptives among postpartum middle class women in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Asian Population Studies. 2019;15(1):105–125.
11. Misnaniarti DA. Unmet need for family planning in Indonesia and the policy strategy of intervention in several countries. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;5(6):1680–1685.
12. Castle S Heidi Schroffel, Jean Jose Nzau Mvuezolo, Bavon Mupenda, Justin Mumbere and Rachel Shapiro. Successful programmatic approaches to facilitating IUD uptake: CARE’s experience in DRC. BMC Women’s Health. 2019;19(1):1–12.
13. Mazzei A Rosine Ingabire, Jeannine Mukamuyango, Julien Nyombayire, Robertine Sinabamenye, Roger Bayingana, Rachel Parker, Amanda Tichacek, Sarah Rae Easter, Etienne Karita, Susan Allen and Kristin M Wall. Community health worker promotions increase uptake of long-acting reversible contraception in Rwanda. Reproductive Health. 2019;16(1):1–12.
14. Wardani NEK Deasy Irawati, Sri Wayanti. Pengaruh Konseling Terhadap Pengetahuan dan Sikap Calon Akseptor KB dalam Pemilihan AKDR Post Plasenta. Jurnal Pamator. 2019;12(1):1–4.
15. Mahendra IGAA Siswanto Agus Wilopo, Sukamdi &I Gusti Ngurah Edi Putra. The role of decision-making pattern on the use of long-acting and permanent contraceptive methods among married women in Indonesia. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 2019;24(6):480–6.
16. Bhandari R Khem Narayan Pokhrel, Nguyen Gabrielle, Archana Amatya. Long acting reversible contraception use and associated factors among married women of reproductive age in Nepal. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0214590.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-20