Monitoring Kepatuhan Peraturan Kawasan Tanpa Rokok di Lingkungan Sekolah Kota Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Heni Trisnowati Universitas Respati Yogyakarta
  • Utari Marlinawati Universitas Respati Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/dpphj.v14i1.1802

Keywords:

monitoring, compliance, smoke-free school policy

Abstract

Background: Smoke-Free School (SFS) policy have been implemented since 2015. These regulations include elementary schools, junior high schools, senior high schools and vocational high schools both private and public. SFS policy aims to create a clean, healthy and smoke-free school environment. Beside, SFS policy is the only effective way to protect the community (school residents) from the dangers of smoke, but the regulation has not been fully implemented by schools in the city of Yogyakarta. This study aims to describe the compliance of SFSP in schools throughout the city of Yogyakarta and the challenges of implementing these regulations. Method: This study used a quantitative method with cross-sectional survey design and observation. The population in this study were all schools in the city of Yogyakarta including elementary, middle and high school or vocational schools. Total samples were 162 schools. The sampling technique used the Proportional Stratified Random Sampling method. Data was collected through one survey and analyzed descriptively using a computer system. Results: input indicators of SFS policy: 89.5% of schools in the Yogyakarta city already have a written policy; 88.3% of schools already have promotional media about smoking bans, 66% of schools already have personnel who monitor SFS policy; Process indicators of SFS policy: 88.9% had already received SFP socialization directly. Output indicator of SFP: there are 146 (90.1%) smoke-free schools in Yogyakarta. Barriers to the implementation of SFS policy include smoking behaviour of school residents, lack of ability to conduct assertiveness, environment and school policies have not to support  SFS. Conclusion: The level of school compliance with SFS in the city of Yogyakarta is high. Socialization of SFS needs to be carried out continuously, especially for pickers (parents) and giving a strict sanction for those who violate SFS policy.

Author Biography

Heni Trisnowati, Universitas Respati Yogyakarta

<p>Program Studi Kesehatan Masyarakat</p><p>Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan</p><p>Universitas Respati Yogyakarta</p>

References

1. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan, Tobacco Control Support Center. Bunga rampai fakta tembakau dan permasalahannya di Indonesia, 2014. 2014.
2. WHO. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011: warning about the dangers of tobacco. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
3. Bennett BL, Deiner M, Pokhrel P. College anti-smoking policies and student smoking behavior: a review of the literature. Tob Induc Dis. 2017;15:11.
4. Permendikbud No. 064 Tahun 2015 Tentang KTR di sekolah, Jakarta.
5. Taruna Z. Implementasi Kebijakan Kawasan Tanpa Rokok di SMA Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta. Spektrum Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan. 2016;5(6):567–577.
6. Kemenkes. Pedoman Pengembangan Kawasan Tanpa Rokok [Internet]. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Replubik Indonesia; 2011 [dikutip 27 Februari 2017]. Tersedia pada: http://www.depkes.go.id/resources/download/promosi-kesehatan/pedoman-ktr.pdf
7. Lestari S. Implementation of regional regulation no. 5 kulon progo 2014 on no smoking area at wates distric vocational high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dan Hukum. 2016;5(4):1-12.
8. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualiattif dan R & D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta; 2010.
9. Thomson G, Wilson N, Collins D, Edwards R. Attitudes to smoke-free outdoor regulations in the USA and Canada: a review of 89 surveys. Tobacco Control. September 2016;25(5):506–516.
10. Fallin A, Roditis M, Glantz SA. Association of campus tobacco policies with secondhand smoke exposure, intention to smoke on campus, and attitudes about outdoor smoking restrictions. Am J Public Health. Juni 2015;105(6):1098–1100.
11. Wilson N, Oliver J, Thomson G. Ten years of a national law covering smoke-free school grounds: a brief review. Tobacco Control. 2015;1(1).
12. Bilir N. Successes and Challenges in Tobacco Control–Turkish Experience of 20 Years. Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology. 2017;19(3):119–123.
13. Agaku IT, Obadan EM, Odukoya OO, Olufajo O. Tobacco-free schools as a core component of youth tobacco prevention programs: a secondary analysis of data from 43 countries. The European Journal of Public Health. 2015;25(2):210–215.
14. Trad C, Bayly J, Saint-Fort L, Andrews M, Patel M, Sabado-Liwag M, dkk. Adoption of Tobacco- and Smoke-Free Policies in a US National Sample of Postsecondary Educational Institutions. American Journal of Public Health. 2018;108(10):1366–1369.
15. Goel S, Ravindra K, Singh RJ, Sharma D. Effective smoke-free policies in achieving a high level of compliance with smoke-free law: experiences from a district of North India. Tobacco Control. 2014;23(4):291–294.
16. Kuipers MAG, de Korte R, Soto VE, Richter M, Moor I, Rimpelä AH, dkk. School smoking policies and educational inequalities in smoking behaviour of adolescents aged 14–17 years in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(2):132–139.
17. Veeranki SP, Mamudu HM, Zheng S, John RM, Cao Y, Kioko D, dkk. Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Never-Smoking Youth in 168 Countries. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2015;56(2):167–173.
18. Coppo A, Galanti MR, Giordano L, Buscemi D, Bremberg S, Faggiano F. School policies for preventing smoking among young people. Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014;10:1-32.
19. Wynne O, Guillaumier A, Twyman L, McCrabb S, Denham A, Paul C, dkk. Signs, Fines and Compliance Officers: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Enforcing Smoke-Free Policy. IJERPH. 2018;15(7):1-14.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-20