Reason and Revelation According to Harun Nasution and Quraish Shihab and its Relevance to Islam Education

Authors

  • Furqan Furqan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Muhammadiyah Mamuju
  • Arham Hikmawan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/al-misbah.v9i1.3890

Keywords:

Reason, Divine Revelation, Qurasy Shihab, Harun Nasution

Abstract

The theme of reason and revelation becomes a hot topic because it is one of the Islamic theology studies that cannot be separated from a polemic. The use of reason is more dominant than a divine revelation will tend to produce a liberal. However, reasoning that ignores a reason will tend to be textual and traditional. The research aims to find out the comparison between the thought of Harun Nasution and Muhammad Quraish Shihab about reason and revelation and its relevance with Islam Education. While this research is theoretically used to enrich the scientific treasures of reason and revelation. The result presents the difference and similarity between both figures’ thoughts on reason and revelation. Harun Nasution and Muhammad Quraish Shihab believe in an absolute truth that only comes from a divine revelation. Humans’ reason has extraordinary potential if it is used appropriately. However, it also has a tendency to drive to an astray way. Besides, both figures emphasize on the moral function of the divine revelation towards human life. The divine revelation brings goodn values for mankind through their lives. The difference is in the capacity in providing an area for reason and revelation. Harun Nasution tends to give a bigger portion to use the reason than the divine revelation in formulating his opinions. Meanwhile, Quraish Shihab is known as a moderate figure because their opinion prioritizes the harmony between reason and revelation.

References

Ahmad, Taufik (dkk). 2005. Sejarah Pemikiran Dan Tokoh Dalam Islam. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Bugin, Burhan. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Aktualisasi. Metodologis Ke Arah Ragam Varian Kontemporer. Jakarta: Raja Grafmdo.
Chailani, Muchammad Iqbal. 2019. “Pemikiran Harun Nasution Tentang Pendidikan Dan Relevansinya Dengan Pendidikan Di Era Modern.” MANAZHIM 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.36088/manazhim.v1i2.207.
Diah Rusmala Dewi. 2019. “RELEVANSI PEMIKIRAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM HARUN NASUTION DENGAN PENDIDIKAN ERA MODERN DI INDONESIA.” As-Salam: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam & Pendidikan 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.51226/assalam.v8i2.139.
Haque, Ziaul. 2000. Wahyu Dan Revolusi. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Irfan, Muhammad. 2018. “PARADIGMA ISLAM RASIONAL HARUN NASUTION: MEMBUMIKAN TEOLOGI KERUKUNAN.” JURNAL ILMIAH SOSIOLOGI AGAMA (JISA) 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.30829/jisa.v1i2.5434.
Khomaidi, Ach. 2005. “Akal Dan Wahyu Dalam Perspektif Harun Nasution.” UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/20498/1/ACH KHOMAIDI-FUF.pdf.
Mukhtasar Syamsuddin. 2012. “HUBUNGAN WAHYU DAN AKAL DALAM TRADISI FILSAFAT ISLAM.” Jurnal Filsafat Arete 1. http://jurnal.wima.ac.id/index.php/ARETE/article/view/173.
Nasution, Hambali Alman. 2020. “RELEVANSI PENDIDIKAN PERSPEKTIF HARUN NASUTION (RELIGIUS-RASIONAL) DENGAN DUNIA MODERN.” Al-Riwayah : Jurnal Kependidikan 12 (2). https://doi.org/10.47945/al-riwayah.v12i2.280.
Nasution, Harun. 1986a. Akal Dan Wahyu Dalam Islam. Jakarta: UI-Press.
Nasution, Harun. 1986b. Islam Ditinjau Dari Berbagai Aspeknya. Jilid II. Jakarta: UI-Press.
Nata, Abuddin. 2003. Metodologi Studi Islam. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Nurrida Dhestiana. 2019. “KEDUDUKAN AKAL & WAHYU PERSPEKTIF M. ABDUH DAN HARUN NASUTION.” Attanwir : Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Dan Pendidikan 10 (Vol. 10 No. 1 (2019): Maret). http://e-jurnal.staiattanwir.ac.id/index.php/attanwir/article/view/12.
Putra, JP. 2015. “Pemikiran Pendidikan Quraish Shihab Dalam Buku Membumikan Al-Qur’an.” UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/30354.
Shabran, Sudarno. 1997. Studi Islam 3. Surakarta: Lembaga Studi Islam Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Shiddieqy, T.M Hasbi. 1999. Sejarah Dan Pengantar Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir. Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Putra.
Shihab, M. Quraish. 1992. Membumikan Al-Qur’an: Fungsi Dan Peran Wahyu Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. Bandung: Mizan.
Shihab, M. Quraish. 2002a. Tafsir Al-Mizbah: Pesan, Kesan Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
Shihab, M. Quraish. 2002b. Tafsir Al-Mizbah: Pesan, Kesan Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Jilid 12. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
Shihab, M. Quraish. 2005a. Logika Agama: Kedudukan Wahyu Dan Batas-Batas Akal Dalam Islam. Jakarta Selatan.
Shihab, M. Quraish. 2005b. Logika Agama: Kedudukan Wahyu Dan Batas-Batas Akal Dalam Islam. Jakarta Selatan: Lentera Hati.
Siti Khasinah. 2013. “HAKIKAT MANUSIA MENURUT PANDANGAN ISLAM DAN BARAT.” Jurnal Ilmiah DIDAKTIKA 13. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jid.v13i2.480.
Syadali, Ahmad dkk. 1989. Refleksi Pembaharuan Pemikiran Islam 70 Tahun Harun Nasution. Jakarta: Lembaga Studi Agama dan Filsafat.
Ukhrowi dan Thaha. 1989. “Menyeru Pemikiran Rasional Mu’tazilah.” Jakarta.
Yuhaswita Yuhaswita. 2017. “AKAL DAN WAHYU DALAM PEMIKIRAN M. QURAISH SHIHAB.” Jurnal Ilmiah Syi’ar 17. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/syr.v17i1.909.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-03

Issue

Section

Articles