Post-Structuralism of Hadith
A Critical Study Of The Logocentrism of Hadith Reason According To J. Derrida's Deconstruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/taqaddumi.v3i1.7752Keywords:
Deconstruction, Logocentrism, HadithAbstract
The dynamics of the struggle of contemporary hadith understanding methodology is one of the interesting phenomena to be studied as the conditions of culture and human civilization accelerate. The search for absolute meaning is impossible. By Deconstruction the rules that envelop Logocentrism can be revealed. Using a deconstruction approach, we can uncover how logocentrism affects the way we understand and interpret hadith, and criticize how such logocentrism might limit our understanding of hadith. The research method is qualitative with a descriptive approach to deco-construction analysis. The results of this study show that it is this kind of Model of Reason that makes hadith reasoning dogmatic, Qathi’, closing itself off from interdisciplinary science and repeatedly failing to hack into the problems of the times. It is also on this basis that the development of the hadith understanding model has stagnated and the methodology is poor. That way, hadith reasoning is easily monopolized by certain madhabs that are full of interests. The crystallization of reason is incapable of dialoguing hadith with reality. It therefore took the deconstruction of Jacques Derrida to dismantle the discourse of logocentrism of hadith reasoning. This deconstruction of hadith reasoning is carried out to see and distinguish universal aspects of Islam and aspects of Islam that are local and temporal, so as not to narrow reason to project hadith as instructions that apply throughout the ages.
References
Ahimsa-Putra, Heddy Shri. “Strukturalisme Levi-strauss Untuk Arkeologi Semiotik’.” Humaniora 11, no. 3 (1999): 5–14.
Ahmadi, Rizqa. “Kontestasi atas Otoritas Teks Suci Islam di Era Disrupsi: Bagaimana Kelas Menengah Muslim Indonesia Memperlakukan Hadis melalui Media Baru.” Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat 15, no. 1 (2019): 22–35.
Al-Fayyadl, Muhammad. Derrida. LKIS Pelangi Aksara, 2005.
Ariwidodo, Eko. “Logosentrisme jacques derrida dalam filsafat bahasa.” KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 21, no. 2 (2013): 340–355.
Armita, Pipin. “PenetaPan Hadis sebagai HujjaH dalam menjawab isu-isu KontemPorer (studi Pada bahtsul masail muktamar nu Ke-33 tahun 2015).” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 18, no. 1 (n.d.): 33–50.
Boullata, Issa J. Dekonstruksi Tradisi; Gelegar Pemikiran Arab Islam. LKIS PELANGI AKSARA, 2002.
Derrida, Jacques. Of grammatology. Jhu Press, 2016.
———. Speech and phenomena, and other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs. Northwestern University Press, 1973.
Dewi, Subkhani Kusuma. “Otoritas Teks Sebagai Pusat dari Praktik Umat Islam.” Jurnal Living Hadis 1, no. 1 (2016): 197–222.
Eriyanti, Ribut Wahyu, Kartika Tiara Syarifuddin, Kasem Datoh, dan Eka Yuliana. Linguistik Umum. Ponorogo: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia, 2020.
Hardiman, Francisco Budi. Filsafat fragmentaris: Deskripsi, kritik, dan dekonstruksi. Kanisius, 2007.
Al Jabiri, Muhammad Abed, dan Aksin Wijaya. Kritik Wacana Teologi Islam. IRCiSoD, 2019.
Lubis, Akhyar Yusuf. “Dekonstruksi Epistemologi Modern” (2021).
Mahfudh, Hasan. “Hermeneutika Hadis Zakariya Ouzon.” dalam Mutawātir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadis 4 (2014).
Nurkhanif, Muhammad. “Nalar Kritis Hadis Rukyah al-Hilal: Kajian Hermeneutika dan Dekonstruksi Hadis.” Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis 4, no. 2 (2018): 265.
Purwanto, Muhammad Roy, dan Resensi Buku. “Dekonstruksi Teori Hukum Islam: Kritik terhadap Konsep Mashlahah Najmuddin al-Thufi.” In International Conference on Advanced Research in Business and Social Sciences. Vol. 2017, 2017.
Rahman, Fazlul. “Otoritas Pemaknaan Kitab Suci: Problematika Pemikiran Edip Yuksel dalam Qur’an: A Reformist Translation.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur’an dan Hadis 15, no. 2 (2014).
Rasyid, Harun. “Keutamaan ilmu ulama perspektif hadis” (2011).
De Saussure, Ferdinand. Pengantar Linguistik Umum.(terj. Rahayu. S. Hidayat). Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 1993.
Seidenberg, Abraham. “The ritual origin of geometry.” Archive for history of exact sciences 1, no. 5 (1961): 488–527.
Sopyan, Yayan. Tarikh tasyri’: sejarah pembentukan hukum Islam. Rajawali Pers, 2010.
Sovia, Sheyla Nichlatus. “KRITIK NALAR ISLAM: ℡AAH PEMIKIRAN MOHAMMED ARKOUN.” EMPIRISMA: JURNAL PEMIKIRAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN ISLAM 30, no. 2 (2021).
Sugiyono. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.
Suhendra, Ahmad. “Hermeneutika Hadis Khaled M. Abou El Fadl.” Mutawatir 5, no. 2 (2016): 343–362.
Sukarto, Kasno Atmo. “PENDEKATAN STRUKTURALISME DALAM PENELITIANN SASTRA, BAHASA, DAN BUDAYA.” Pujangga: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra 3, no. 2 (2018): 190–223.
Syarifuddin, Syarifuddin. “Konstruksi Filsafat Barat Kontemporer.” Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 13, no. 2 (2011): 231–248.
Umar, Mustofa. “Konvergensi Agama dan Sains dalam Melacak Basis Ontologi Semesta: Tinjauan Hermeneutika Hadis Penciptaan.” Jurnal Theologia 27, no. 1 (2016): 173–212.
Wahid, Muhammad Abduh. “Melacak Akar Kesejarahan Hadis Nabi Pra-Kodifikasi.” Tahdis: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Hadis 6, no. 1 (2015).
Zamroni, Mohammad. Filsafat Komunikasi: Pengantar Ontologis, Epistemologis, dan Aksiologis. IRCISOD, 2009.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Irwansya, Taufikquraman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read the Taqaddumi Author Guidelines at http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/taqaddumi/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with the Taqaddumi Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
