Collaborative Concept Mapping: A Study of Group Work Satisfaction in Vocational Higher Education


  • Malikhatul Lailiyah Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Karlina Karadila Yustisia Universitas Merdeka Malang



Computer-supported collaborative learning, Collaboration learning, Knowledge collaboration, Concept mapping


Collaboration is gaining traction in today's educational environment. Thus, teachers' primary concern is assisting students in experiencing group knowledge collaboration. As online education continues to grow in popularity, there is an increasing need to promote and understand collaborative learning processes. Its success is contingent upon implementing online collaborative learning strategies that foster critical thinking abilities while also providing meaningful collaborative learning opportunities. Collaborative concept mapping is one tool that could be used to foster student collaboration. Rather than creating and visualizing ideas individually, collaborative concept mapping involves two or more students working collaboratively to create one or more concept maps. In collaborative learning, interactions between learners are critical sources of idea generation. The purpose of this study is to examine students’ satisfaction with implementing the strategy in Second Language Reading class. The recent study advances our understanding of how to effectively use collaborative teaching tools in the classroom and improve student learning through group collaboration. The study's findings indicate that students demonstrated positive attitudes toward group collaboration, as evidenced by collaborative concept mapping. In addition, the collaborative learning processes embedded in concept mapping learning platforms support and facilitate reading comprehension achievement, resulting in successful foreign language learning for higher education students. The interaction in collaborative concept mapping, lacking in individual concept mapping, has facilitated individual and group knowledge building. As a result, implementing this strategy may benefit both group and individual learning.


Bixler, G. M., Brown, A., Way, D., Ledford, C., & Mahan, J. D. (2015). Collaborative concept mapping and critical thinking in fourth-year medical students. Clinical Pediatrics, 54(9), 833–839.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Chang, C.-C., Liu, G.-Y., Chen, K.-J., Huang, C.-H., Lai, Y.-M., & Yeh, T.-K. (2017). The effects of a collaborative computer-based concept mapping strategy on Geographic Science performance in Junior High School students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5049–5060.

Chang, C.-C., Yeh, T.-K., & Shih, C.-M. (2016). The effects of integrating computer-based concept mapping for physics learning in junior high school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2531–2542.

Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160–175.

Chiu, C.-H., Huang, C.-C., & Chang, W.-T. (2000). The evaluation and influence of interaction in networks supported collaborative concept mapping. Computers & Education, 34(1), 17–25.

Farrokhnia, M., Pijeira-Díaz, H. J., Noroozi, O., & Hatami, J. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: The effects of different instructional designs on conceptual understanding and knowledge co-construction. Computers & Education, 142, 103640.

Fink, A. (2003). How to design survey studies. Sage.

Gao, H., Shen, E., Losh, S., & Turner, J. (2007). A review of studies on collaborative concept mapping: What have we learned about the technique, and what is next? Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 479–492.

Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2013). Using concept maps to facilitate collaborative simulation-based inquiry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 340–374.

Ibrahim, N., Shak, M. S. Y., Mohd, T., Ismail, N. A., Perumal, P. D. a/p, Zaidi, A., & Yasin, S. M. A. (2015). The Importance of Implementing Collaborative Learning in the English as a Second Language (ESL) Classroom in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 346–353.

Jonassen, D. H., & Strobel, J. (2006). I was modeling for meaningful learning. In Engaged learning with emerging technologies (pp. 1–27). Springer.

Komis, V., Avouris, N., & Fidas, C. (2002). Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: Study of synchronous peer interaction. Education and Information Technologies, 7(2), 169–188.

Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2009). The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education, 52(2), 365–375.

Lailiyah, M., Setiyaningsih, L. A., Wediyantoro, P. L., & Yustisia, K. K. (2021). Assessing an effective collaboration in higher education: A study of students’ experiences and challenges on group collaboration. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka): Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 6(2), 97–105.

Lailiyah, M., & Wediyantoro, P. L. (2021). Critical thinking in second language learning : Students’ attitudes and beliefs. International Journal of Language Education, 5(3), 180–192.

McNeil, S. G., Robin, B. R., & Miller, R. M. (2000). Facilitating interaction, communication, and collaboration in online courses. Computers & Geosciences, 26(6), 699–708.

Muindi, E. N., Mwania, J. M., & Metet, J. (2017). Influence of collaboration as a conflict management style on academic performance in secondary schools in Makueni Sub-County, Makueni County, Kenya.

Pinandito, A., Hayashi, Y., & Hirashima, T. (2021). Online Collaborative Kit-Build Concept Map: Learning Effect and Conversation Analysis in Collaborative Learning of English as a Foreign Language Reading Comprehension. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E104.D(7), 981–991.

Ojima, M. (2006). Concept mapping as pre-task planning: A case study of three Japanese ESL writers. System, 34(4), 566–585.

Soller, A. (2001). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 12, 40–62.

Stump, G. S., Hilpert, J. C., Husman, J., Chung, W. T., & Kim, W. (2011). Collaborative learning in engineering students: Gender and achievement. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 475–497.

Tseng, H., Ku, H.-Y., Wang, C.-H., & Sun, L. (2009). Critical factors in online collaboration and their relationship to teamwork satisfaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(2).

Tyran, C. K., & Shepherd, M. (2001). Collaborative technology in the classroom: A review of the GSS research and a research framework. Information Technology and Management, 2(4), 395–418.

Uribe, D., Klein, J. D., & Sullivan, H. (2003). The effect of computer-mediated collaborative learning on solving III-defined problems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 5–19.

Van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., Roelofs, E., & Erkens, G. (2002). Collaborative concept mapping: Provoking and supporting meaningful discourse. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 40–46.

Wediyantoro, P. L., Lailiyah, M., & Yustisia, K. K. (2020). Synchronous discussion in online learning: Investigating students’ critical thinking. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 5(2), 196–203.