Community Interest and the Future of Community Academy: a Case for Establishing a State Polytechnic in West-South Aceh

Febri Nurrahmi; Tanzir Masykar; Hery Wiharja; Andi Mustari; Haimi Ardiansyah; Mahlil Mahlil

doi:10.12928/joves.v9i1.13386

Authors

Febri Nurrahmi Universitas Syiah Kuala
Tanzir Masykar Akademi Komunitas Negeri Aceh Barat
Hery Wiharja Akademi Komunitas Negeri Aceh Barat
Andi Mustari Akademi Komunitas Negeri Aceh Barat
Haimi Ardiansyah Akademi Komunitas Negeri Aceh Barat
Mahlil Mahlil Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/joves.v9i1.13386

Keywords:

Community academy, community interest, polytechnic development, West-South Aceh, workforce alignment

Abstract

This study examines community perceptions and levels of interest in the establishment of a state polytechnic in the West-South Aceh region, particularly following the collaborative initiative of D4 programs by Akademi Komunitas Negeri Aceh Barat (AKN Aceh Barat) and Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe (PNL). Using a quantitative cross-sectional design, data were collected through an online survey completed by 242 respondents. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, and one-way ANOVA were applied to assess perceptions across three key indicators: the urgency of establishing a polytechnic, personal interest in attending, and family interest in polytechnic education. Results indicate overwhelming support across demographic groups, with over 93% consider the establishment urgent, and more than 84% expressed personal or familial interest. Although men showed significantly higher personal interest than women, no significant differences were observed by region or education level. Community preferences for mining, maritime, and informatics programs demonstrate a clear connection to the region’s workforce demands and industrial profile. These findings provide strong empirical support for upgrading AKN Aceh Barat into a state polytechnic, addressing both educational and regional workforce development needs.

References

Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-learning critical success factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of e-learning managerial perspectives. Education Sciences, 10(9), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090216

Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292

Bada, D., & Olusegun, S. (n.d.). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning.

Badaruddin, M., Noni, N., Jabu, B., Basri, M., Ziska, I. Y., Agung, M., B., M., Malik, A., Hartoto, M., Larekeng, S. H., Nur, R., & Dangnga, M. S. (2019). Need analysis to design blended learning model: An instructional design to create a dynamic, engaging and student-centered learning environment. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Advanced Multidisciplinary Research (ICAMR 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/icamr-18.2019.19

Capone, R., & Lepore, M. (2022). From distance learning to integrated digital learning: A fuzzy cognitive analysis focused on engagement, motivation, and participation during COVID-19 pandemic. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(4), 1259–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09571-w

Cubacub, P. D. C., & Jimenez, E. C. (2025). The role of blended learning in enhancing student engagement: Evidence from high schools in Micronesia. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 3. https://doi.org/10.33902/IJODS.202533074

De Bruijn-Smolders, M., & Prinsen, F. R. (2024). Effective student engagement with blended learning: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(23), e39439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39439

Distyasa, M. J. E., Winanti, E. T., Buditjahjanto, I. G. P. A., & Rijanto, T. (2021). The effect of project-based blended learning (PJB2L) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 3(4), 268. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v3i4.3959

Efgivia, M. G., Adora Rinanda, R. Y., Suriyani, Hidayat, A., Maulana, I., & Budiarjo, A. (2021). Analysis of constructivism learning theory. In 1st UMGESHIC International Seminar on Health, Social Science and Humanities (UMGESHIC-ISHSSH 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211020.032

Hein, G. E. (1991). Constructivist learning theory. Institute for Inquiry.

Howard Miller, A. (2018). Using unsupervised machine learning to model tax practice learning theory. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.4), 109. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.4.13019

Kuo, T.-Y., Chen, S.-K., & Lin, S. (2023). Exploring student engagement and teacher-student interaction patterns in collaborative STEM PBL courses through epistemic network analysis. In International Conference on Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.58459/icce.2023.1398

Li, W., Gillies, R., He, M., Wu, C., Liu, S., Gong, Z., & Sun, H. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to online medical and nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives from international students from low- and middle-income countries and their teaching staff. Human Resources for Health, 19(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00609-9

Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003

Mok, K. H., Xiong, W., & Bin Aedy Rahman, H. N. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic’s disruption on university teaching and learning and competence cultivation: Student evaluation of online learning experiences in Hong Kong. International Journal of Chinese Education, 10(1), 22125868211007011. https://doi.org/10.1177/22125868211007011

Moubayed, A., Injadat, M., Shami, A., & Lutfiyya, H. (2021). Student engagement level in e-learning environment: Clustering using K-means. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ecg4x

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y

Setiyani, R., H., Lianingsih, S., & Susilowati, N. (2020). Using blended learning to enhance students’ engagement and learning experience in taxation. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i6.6615

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., & Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1189–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12748

Van Laerhoven, H., Van der Zaag-Loonen, H., & Derkx, B. (2004). A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children’s questionnaires. Acta Paediatrica, 93(6), 830–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb03026.x

Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.