Development of Video-Based Learning Model Through “Seesaw” Application to Improve Process Skills Reviewed from the Motivation and Initial Understanding of Vocational High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/joves.v8i1.11574Keywords:
Video-Based Learning, “Seesaw” Application, Process Skills, Vocational EducationAbstract
Knowing how much learning has improved in students after using Physics learning media based on Video-Based Learning through the “Seesaw” application. This study employed a One-Group Pre-test Post-test Design. 34 SMK Bhakti Mulia Blora 10th-grade students served as the study's samples. The Simple Random Sampling technique was used to sample the sample members. Pre-experiment tests and questionnaires provided the data, which were then analyzed using paired t-tests. By using the "Seesaw" program to create instructional films, teachers can cut down on the amount of time they spend teaching and standardize the way that lesson materials are delivered. Additionally, because they are able to take in and comprehend the instructional information more thoroughly, kids become more engaged in the learning process, which makes learning more exciting overall. Teachers may easily plan and construct learning activities, assessments, and records of student work by using the "Seesaw" program. Students performed better in the post-test than they did in the pre-test. Additionally, student performance has improved from cycle to cycle. When utilizing the "Seesaw" program for video-based learning in Physics, students' process abilities have improved as opposed to manual learning.
References
Baticulon, R. E., Sy, J. J., Alberto, N. R. I., Baron, M. B. C., Mabulay, R. E. C., Rizada, L. G. T., Tiu, C. J. S., Clarion, C. A., & Reyes, J. C. B. (2021). Barriers to online learning in the time of COVID-19: A national survey of medical students in the Philippines. Medical Science Educator, 31, 615–626.
Binti Abd Aziz, N. A., Bin Musa, M. H., & Binti Abd Aziz, N. N. (2020). A study on barriers contributing to an efective online learning among undergraduates students. Open Journal of Science and Technology, 3(1), 17–23.
Bringula, R. P., Batalla, M. Y. C., & Borebor, M. T. F. (2021). Modeling computing students’ perceived academic performance in an online learning environment [Paper presentation]. ACM-SIGITE’21, SnowBird, UT, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/34503 29.3476856.
Cao, G. (2022). Towards the favorable consequences of academic motivation and L2 enjoyment for students’ willingness to communicate in the second language (L2WTC). Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997566.
Castañeda, L., Esteve-Mon, F. M., & Adell, J. (2018). Teaching and learning in the digital age: The role of digital competence. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 79-87.
Chaubey, A. (2015). Learning Management System in Higher Education. Good Teaching Attributes in Engineering Education, V(3), 150-158.
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219-243.
Coleman, J.M., etc. (2020). Elementary Teachers’ of Graphical Representation in Science Teaching. Journal Science Teacher Education, 4(2), 1-31.
Datu, J. A. D., & Yang, W. (2021). Academic buoyancy, academic motivation, and academic achievement among Filipino high school students. Current Psychology, 40(8), 3958–3965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00358-y.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Optimizing students’ motivation in the era of testing and pressure: A self-determination theory perspective. In W. Liu, J. Wang, & R. Ryan (Eds.), Building autonomous learners: Perspectives from research and practice using self-determination theory (pp. 9–29). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-630-0_2.
Duryat, M. (2020). Opportunity Pendidikan: Transformasi Di Era Disrupsi dan Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Wahana Karya Ilmiah_Pascasarjana (S2) PAI Unsika, 4(2), 93-104.
Fabito, B. S., Trillanes, A. O., & Sarmiento, J. R. (2021). Barriers and challenges of computing students in an online learning environment: Insights from one private university in the Philippines. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 5(1), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.51.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). What works and what doesn’t work with instructional video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 465-470.
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference, 41-50.
Hanifah, N. (2017). Perbandingan Tingkat Kesukaran, Daya Pembeda Butir Soal Dan Reliabilitas Tes Bentuk Pilihan Ganda Biasa dan Pilihan Ganda Asosiasi Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi. Sosio e-KONS, 6(1), 41-55.
Hattie, J., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 47-87.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
He, W., Xu, G., & Kruck, S. (2014). Online IS Education for the 21st Century. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(2), 101-105.
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1579.
Hindasah. I, Maskur, M., Risnandah, Y., Halimah, E. T.(2020). Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Seesaw Untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan Belajar. Edutech, 19(3), 263-278.
Indonesian Government (1990). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 29 Tahun. 1990. Jakarta: BPK RI.
Jiao, S., Jin, H., You, Z., & Wang, J. (2022). Motivation and its efect on language achievement: Sustainable development of Chinese middle school students’ second language learning. Sustainability, 14(16), 9918. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169918.
Joe, H. K., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). Classroom social climate, self-determined motivation, willingness to communicate, and achievement: A study of structural relationships in instructed second language settings. Learning and Individual Diferences, 53, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.005.
Kay, R. H., LeSage, A., & Knaack, L. (2019). Exploring student perceptions of video-based learning: Implications for instructional design. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 13-21.
Kaya, S., Eryilmaz, N., & Yuksel, D. (2022). The efects of motivational and metacognitive variables on immigrant and nonimmigrant students’ reading achievement. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101944.
Madsen, A., McKagan, S. B., & Sayre, E. C. (2015). How physics instruction impacts students’ beliefs about learning physics: A meta-analysis of 24 studies. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11, 010115.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Moorhouse, B. L. (2019). Seesaw: https://web. seesaw. me. RELC Journal, 50(3), 493-496.
Mulyadi, D.E. (2020). Pembelajaran Daring Fisika Melalui Whatsapp, Google Form, dan Email dalam Capaian Presensi Aktif dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 5(1), 34-41.
Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of online learning and teaching, 11(2), 309-319.
Nuhanisa, H., Pangesti, R. & Fajri, A. (2019). Metode Uji Independent T-Test, Dependent T-Test, dan Wilcoxon Signed T-Test. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Peng, C. (2021). The academic motivation and engagement of students in English as a foreign language classes: Does teacher praise matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 778174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.778174.
Ramanta, D., & Widayanti, F. D. (2020). Pembelajaran Daring di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Putra Indonesia Malang pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Prosiding Seminar Bimbingan dan Konseling, 9(4), 61-68.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Defnitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.
Sablić, M., Mirosavljević, A., & Škugor, A. (2021). Video-based learning (VBL)—past, present and future: An overview of the research published from 2008 to 2019. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 1061-1077.
Samad, S., & Setyabudhi, A. L. (2023). Application of Video-Based Learning Media with Applications to Improve Learning Activities of Vocational High School Students. Technical and Vocational Education International Journal (TAVEIJ), 3(1), 22-27.
Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 293-305.
Selwyn, N. (2020). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.
Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide and digital skills: A review. Telematics and Informatics, 53, 101-109.
Van Riesen, S., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A., & de Jong, T. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. International Journal of Science Education, 40, 1327 –1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1477263.
Wang, X. (2022). Enhancing Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement: The impact of L2 enjoyment and academic motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 914682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.914682.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
Wu, Z. (2019). Academic motivation, engagement, and achievement among college students. College Student Journal, 53(1), 99–112.
Yin, H., & Wang, W. (2016). Undergraduate students’ motivation and engagement in China: An exploratory study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(4), 601–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1037240.
Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43(1), 15-27.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Vocational Education Studies (JOVES) agree to the following terms: Authors retain the copyright and grant the Universitas Ahmad Dahlan right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Universitas Ahmad Dahlan. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Universitas Ahmad Dahlan. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png)
