Blended collaboration problem-based learning to improve critical thinking ability and complete learning of students on human heredity materials

Suparini Suparini

doi:10.26555/joubins.v2i1.6184

Authors

Suparini Suparini SMA N 36 Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/joubins.v2i1.6184

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Problem Based Learning, Active learning

Abstract

Based on the analysis at SMAN 36 in Biology learning, some students do have not optimal critical thinking skills and have not achieved minimum completeness. This can be seen in the lack of willingness to ask questions, involvement in opinion, and formulating problems does not reflect questions that use higher-order thinking. The study aims to determine the improvement of critical thinking skills and learning completeness of students in class XII MIPA 4 SMAN 36 Jakarta in human heredity. The method used is classroom action research which consists of two cycles through BCPBL. Learning is carried out with presentation discussions to explain the cases of each group which are prepared asynchronously. Data collecting by tests, observation of learning activities, and student response questionnaires. The research data were analyzed using a comparative description followed by reflection. The comparative description is done by comparing the initial condition data, cycles I and II, both for learning activities and learning outcomes. The results of this study indicate that BCPBL can improve critical thinking skills and complete learning from cycle I to cycle II. The results of the daily assessment in the first cycle showed that 28 students (77.78%) completed. The second cycle showed that 31 students (86.11%) completed it. Through BCPBL learning activities, students have an active learning experience, have interest, and respond as expected.

References

Anders, Norberg, Dziuban Charles D., and Moskal Patsy D. 2011. “A Time‐based Blended Learning Model.” On the Horizon 19(3):207–16. doi: 10.1108/10748121111163913.

Arends, R.I. (2008). Learning to Teach Belajar untuk Mengajar. (Edisi Ketujuh/Buku Dua). Terjemahan Helly Pajitno Soetjipto & Sri Mulyantini Soetjipto. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ark, T. Vander, T. Hudson, and J. Baugh. 2014. “Blended Learning: Best Practices for Empowering Students and Educator.” in Dipresentasikan pada Dreambox Learning, A District Administration Web Seminar Digest. Diambil dari http://www. districadministration. com/ws032014.

Diep, Anh Nguyet, Chang Zhu, Katrien Struyven, and Yves Blieck. 2017. “Who or What Contributes to Student Satisfaction in Different Blended Learning Modalities?” British Journal of Educational Technology 48(2):473–89. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12431.

Djamarah, S., B. (2014) . Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta. Eggen, Paul, and Don Kauchak. 2012. “Strategi Dan Model Pembelajaran Mengajar Konten Dan Keterampilan Berpikir.(Terjemahan Satrio Wahono).” Ennis, Robert H. 1993. “Critical Thinking Assessment.” Theory Into Practice 32(3):179–86. doi: 10.1080/00405849309543594.

Gurubatham, Mohan Raj. 2013. “Blended Action Learning Involving Metacognition and Active Discussion Internationally.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 93:2157–72. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.182.

Hidayati, Nurkhairo, Siti Zubaidah, Endang Suarsini, and Henry Praherdhiono. 2019. “An Effective Learning Model Derived from Integration Problem-Based Learning and Digital Mind Maps to Enhance Students’ Creativity.” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 369–74. doi: 10.1145/3345120.3345138.

Keane, Therese, William F. Keane, and Aaron S. Blicblau. 2016. “Beyond Traditional Literacy: Learning and Transformative Practices Using ICT.” Education and Information Technologies 21(4):769–81. doi: 10.1007/s10639-014-9353-5.

Keeley, Page. 2015. Teaching for Conceptual Understanding in Science. Krupnik-gottlieb, hava E. vidego. and michael. 2015. “And Project Based Learning in Blended.” 217–32.

Mahanal, Susriyati, Siti Zubaidah, Ika Dewi Sumiati, Tri Maniarta Sari, and Nur Ismirawati. 2019. “RICOSRE: A Learning Model to Develop Critical Thinking Skills for Students with Different Academic Abilities.” International Journal of Instruction 12(2):417–34. doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12227a.

Montoro, Miriam Agreda, Francisco Javier Hinojo-Lucena, and Francisco Raso Sánchez. 2015. “A Study on ICT Training among Faculty Members of Spanish Faculties of Education.” New Educational Review 42(4):27–39. doi: 10.15804/tner.2015.42.4.02.

Norberg, Anders, C. D. Dziuban, and P. .. & Moskal. 2011. “A Time‐based Blended Learning Model.” On the Horizon 19(3):207–16. doi: 10.1108/10748121111163913.

Plessis, André Du. 2015. “Rethinking Traditional Science Teaching through Infusing ICT Learning Embedded by a ‘Learning-as-Design’ Approach.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 14(1): Continuous.

Rusdi, Rusdi, Dian Evriyani, and Dwi Khaerunnisa Praharsih. 2016. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Peer Instruction Flip Dan Flipped Classroom Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Pada Materi Sistem Ekskresi.” Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi 9(1):15–19. doi: 10.21009/biosferjpb.9-1.3.

Rusman, Kurniawan, D., Rivana, C., (2011). Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Jakarata, Rajagrafindo Persada. Siew, Nyet Moi, Chin Lu Chong, and Bih Ni Lee. 2015. “Fostering Fifth Graders’ Scientific Creativity

through Problem-Based Learning.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 14(5):655–69. doi: 10.33225/jbse/15.14.655.

Stupple, Edward J. N., Frances A. Maratos, James Elander, Thomas E. Hunt, Kevin Y. F. Cheung, and Aimee V Aubeeluck. 2017. “Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): A Measure of Student Attitudes and Beliefs about Critical Thinking.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 23:91–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.007.

Sugiharto, Bowo, Aloysius Duran Corebima, Herawati Susilo, and Ibrohim. 2019. “The Pre-Service Biology Teacher Readiness in Blended Collaborative Problem Based Learning (BCPBL).” International Journal of Instruction 12(4):113–30. doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.1248a.

Suparini, Suparini, Rusdi Rusdi, and Rizhal Hendi Ristanto. 2020. “Guided Discovery-Blended Learning (GDBL): An Innovative Learning to Improve Conceptual Excretory System.” Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah 5(2):191–204. doi: 10.24042/tadris.v5i2.6849.

Tabazkova, Z. (2015). Outside the Classroom Thinking Inside the Classroom Walls: Enhancing Students` Critical Thinking Through Reading Literary Texts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 186, 726-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.042.

Tarhan, Leman, and Burcin Acar-sesen. 2013. “9 Pbl in Acid Base.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 12(5):565–78.

Yudasmini, Ni M., Nyoman Jampel, and AAIN Marhaeni. 2015. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran CIRC (Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition) Terhadap Minat Baca Dan Kemampuan Memahami Bacaan Pada Siswa Kelas VI Di Sekolah Dasar Gugus Buruan.” Junal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha 5(1):1–8.

Zubaidah, Siti. 2017. PEMBELAJARAN KONTEKSTUAL BERBASIS PEMECAHAN MASALAH UNTUK MENGEMBANGKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS.

Zubaidah, Siti, and A. D. Corebima. 2011. “Asesmen Berpikir Kritis Terintegrasi Tes Essay.” Symbion: Symposium on Biology Education (January).