Students’ theses as tool for prospecting major courses in biology study program

Muhammad Janra; Henny Herwina

doi:10.26555/joubins.v5i1.12955

Authors

Muhammad Janra Biology Departmen, Universitas Andalas
Henny Herwina Universitas Andalas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/joubins.v5i1.12955

Keywords:

animal systematics, microbiology, mixed topics, plant ecology, unstructured interview

Abstract

Students in the Department of Biology at Andalas University are required to write a thesis based on one of ten core subjects: animal systematics, plant systematics, animal ecology, plant ecology, microbiology, genetics, animal physiology, plant physiology, animal structure and development, and plant structure and development. This study analyzed the dynamics of student interest in these subjects as thesis topics from 2000 to 2019. A total of 1,201 thesis titles were analyzed descriptively based on the average and frequency per year, and visualized in tables and graphs. The results showed that microbiology was the most popular (14.7 theses/year), followed by plant physiology (9.8) and animal systematics (9.4). The two least popular fields were animal and plant structure and development (fewer than two theses/year). Unstructured interviews with final-year students revealed that the availability of supervisors, research funding, and laboratory access were the primary factors influencing topic selection. Theses with a single topic were more numerous than those with mixed topics. Integrating two or more courses into one thesis can be a solution to increase interest in less popular courses. If this approach is not effective, it may be worth considering removing the course from the elective list for the final project. The implications of these findings suggest that enhancing interdisciplinary research opportunities might also encourage broader topic selection. Continuous evaluation of the curriculum is necessary to ensure that elective subjects remain relevant and aligned with students’ interests and departmental capabilities, potentially leading to curriculum refinement or restructuring.

Author Biography

Henny Herwina, Universitas Andalas

Departement of Biology

References

Arnseth, H. C., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2010). Challenges in aligning pedagogical practices and pupils’ competencies with the information society’s demands: The case of Norway. Cases on Interactive Technology Environments and Transnational Collaboration: Concerns and

Perspectives, 266–280. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-909-5.ch014

Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36(5), 694–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.007

Burke, P. E. P., & Costa, L. da F. (2019). Interdisciplinary Relationships Between Biological and Physical Sciences. http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.03298

Chandra, O. P. (2015). Kendala Mahasiswa dalam Menyusun Skripsi (Studi Kasus: Mahasiswa Program Pendidikan Sosiologi Angkatan Tahun 2008-2010) Jurusan Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmus Sosial, Universitas Negeri Jakarta) (Issue 2). Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute.

Ghavifekr, S., Afshari, M., & Salleh, A. (2012). Management strategies for e-learning system as the core component of systemic change: A qualitative analysis. 9(3), 2190–2196.

Gul, S., & Sozbilir, M. (2016). International trends in biology education research from 1997 to 2014: A content analysis of apers in selected journals. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1631–1651.

Hadi, S., & H. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. CV Pustaka Setia.

Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2011). The Impact of Research Grant Funding on Scientific Productivity. Journal of Public Economy, 95(9–10), 1168-1177.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005

Klein, J. T., Bruun, H., Hukkinen, J., & Huutoniemi, K. (2005). Promoting interdisciplinary research: The case of the academy of Finland. In Publications of the academy of Finland (Vol. 8, Issue 05).

Purwanto, B. A. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M.A., Amin, A. S. (2014). Writing a literature review research paper: A step-by-step approach. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 3(1), 47–56.

Siswanto, I., Sampurno, Y. G. (2013). Faktor-faktor penghambat penyelesaian tugas akhir skripsi mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Otomotif Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Tim-Akademik-Jurusan-Biologi. (2015). Buku Panduan Akademik Program Sarjana Biologi. Departemen Biologi Universitas Andalas.

UNESCO. (2010). Current Challenges in Basic Science Education.

Wu, S., Oubibi, M., & Bao, K. (2024). How supervisors affect students’ academic gains and research ability: An investigation through a qualitative study. Heliyon, 10(10).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31079

Yendri, Y. (2019). Psychological Factors Affecting Undergraduate Students’ Difficulties in Writing. Thesis. State Institute for Islamic Studies.

Zackariasson, M., & Magnusson, J. (2024). Supervising student independence: A research-based approach to academic supervision in practice. In Supervising Student Independence: A Research-based Approach to Academic Supervision in Practice.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66371-0

Zvobgo, K. (2022). Research labs: concept, utility, and application. In P. Huddleston, R., Jamieson, T., James (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in International Relations (p. 800). Edward Elgar Publishing.