Analysis of metacognition difficulties in problem-solving static fluid material in term of Hippocrates – Galenus personality type

Eni Setyawati, Susilawati Susilawati, Dwi Sulisworo

Abstract


Describing student's metacognition difficulties and thinking the process in problem-solving static fluid material in each melancholic, sanguinic, phlegmatic, and choleric (Hippocrates - Galenus) personality type. This data analysis method uses a Likert scale as a measurement scale. The data analysis technique used was grouping data into four categories: Understanding The Problem, Devising A Plan, Carrying Out The Plan, Looking Back. The cause of students' metacognition difficulties caused by a lack of understanding the concept of physics, knowing symbols, formulations, notations, and calculations that will be done in each problem solving, and lack of understanding strategies in problem-solving. Students who had a melancholic, sanguinic, choleric personality type were students who had metacognition difficulties when understanding and solving the problem, and also had problems in considering strategies and realizing the use of using strategy. Students who had the Phlegmatic personality type were able to understand the problem by looking at the problem and then making an image so that it can change the information into the form of physics.  

Keywords


Metacognition Difficulty, Problem Solving, Hippocrates - Galenus Personality Type

Full Text:

PDF

References


Karwono and Mularsih. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta:PPM, 2010.

D.Sulisworo. Conceptual Model Identification of The Personal Learning Environment.International Seminar on Education Innovation and Development in Teaching and Learning, 2014, pp. 37-41.

BSNP. Standar Isi dan Standar Kompetensi Lulusan SMA/SMK. Jakarta: Kemdiknas. 2016.

T. R. Astuti,Deskripsi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMA Negeri 4 Purwokerto (Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Tipologi Hippocrates- Galenus), Dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, 2016.

J. A. Livingston, Metacognition: An Overview, Education Resources Information Center, 1997.

G. Polya, Howto Solve it, Princeton University Press Electronic Book, 2004.

Z. C. Ozcan, Assessment of Metacognition in Mathematics: Which One of Two Methods is a Better Predictor of Mathematics Achievement?An International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, 2014, pp. 49-57.

P. A. Tippler. Physics for Science and Engineering Vol. 1, Erlangga, 2010.

D. Oktaviyanti. Remediasi Miskonsepsi siswa menggunakan Pembelajaran Learning CYCLE 3E Pada Materi Fluida Statis di MAN. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Universitas Tanjung Pura pontianak. vol.5, no.12, 2016.

Sugiyono. Educational Research Methods Quantitative, Qualitative Approach and R&D, Alphabet Bandung, 2010.

E. Setyawati. Pengaruh Strategi Konflik Kognitif Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Siswa XI IPA. Dissertation,UniversitasMuhammadiyah Metro, 2012.

G. Iswahyudi, Aktivitas Metakognisi dalam Memecahkan Masalah Pembuktian Langsung Ditinjau dari Gender dan Kemampuan Matematika. Prosiding SNMPM, 2012. Pp.88-102.

F. Camelian, Analysis of Student Metacognition Difficulties in Solving The Problem of Two-Variable Linear Inequality Systems in Terms of Guardian, Artisan, Rational and Idealist Personality Types in Class X of SMK 1 Jombang. Electronic Learning Mathematics Journal, vol.4, no.9, 2016, pp. 824-835.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v1i2.780

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Indonesian Review of Physics
Kampus 2 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Jalan Pramuka No. 42, Pandeyan, Umbulharjo, Yogyakarta - 55161
Telp. (0274) 563515, ext. 4902; Fax. (0274) 564604
Email: irip@mpfis.uad.ac.id


p-ISSN: 2621-3761 | e-ISSN: 2621-2889

 

View My Stats