STEM ISCIT Learning Tools to Improve Integrative Scientific Thinking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v4i2.5265Keywords:
Integrative Scientific Thinking , Learning Media , STEM ISCIT , The New NormalAbstract
Learning in the era of the new university regulations experienced a revolution in students’ learning style and teachers’ teaching style because this situation caused many changes in the learning system. Different types of learning alternatives are carried out to achieve learning that meets these conditions. Integrative STEM was selected as one of the learning models in the new order era. However, inclusive STEM learning is difficult to do without support or learning tools, especially in distance learning. Based on these needs, this research was carried out to develop support devices for the integrative STEM model in university physics class students. This research is research and development (R&D). The development model used uses a 4D development model. The 4D model is synonymous with definition, design, development, and dissemination. In this study, an assistive device model was developed in an integrative MINT learning device. The analysis results show that the development of integrative learning tools based on STEM for students is rated as good, with an average of 80%.
References
H. d’Orville, “COVID-19 Causes Unprecedented Educational Disruption: Is There a Road Towards a New Normal?,” Prospects, vol. 49, no. 1–2, pp. 11–15, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11125-020-09475-0.
M. S. Panggabean and K. K. Himawan, “The Development of Indonesian Teacher Competence Questionnaire,” J. Educ. Heal. Community Psychol., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 1, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.12928/jehcp.v5i2.5134.
P. Makhashova et al., “On the Development of Professional Competence in Students of Creative Pedagogical Specialties,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 4660–4668, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijese.net/makale/650.html.
A. Asmuni, “Problematika Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 dan Solusi Pemecahannya [Problems of Online Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic and Solutions to Solve it],” J. Paedagogy, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 281, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.33394/jp.v7i4.2941.
L. D. Herliandry, N. Nurhasanah, M. E. Suban, and H. Kuswanto, “Pembelajaran Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 [Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic],” JTP - J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 65–70, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.21009/jtp.v22i1.15286.
A. M. Saifulloh and M. Darwis, “Manajemen Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Proses Belajar Mengajar di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 [Learning Management in Improving the Effectiveness of the Teaching and Learning Process during the Covid-19 Pandemic],” Bidayatuna J. Pendidik. Guru Mandrasah Ibtidaiyah, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 285, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.36835/bidayatuna.v3i2.638.
A. Hussein, M. M. Gaber, E. Elyan, and C. Jayne, “Imitation Learning,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 1–35, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1145/3054912.
S. Li, H. Du, W. Xing, J. Zheng, G. Chen, and C. Xie, “Examining Temporal Dynamics of Self-Regulated Learning Behaviors in STEM Learning: A Network Approach,” Comput. Educ., vol. 158, p. 103987, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103987.
D. Sartika, “Pentingnya Pendidikan Berbasis STEM dalam Kurikulum 2013 [The Importance of STEM-Based Education in the 2013 Curriculum],” J. Ilmu Sos. dan Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 89–93, 2019, doi: 10.36312/jisip.v3i3.797.
P. Chaiwongsa, N. Kinboon, and N. Yanasarn, “STEM - Play, Learn and Work: STEM Education in Academic Club Based on Community and Local Products to Improve a Positive Attitude towards STEM,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1340, no. 1, p. 012004, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012004.
C. D. Putri, I. D. Pursitasari, and B. Rubini, “Problem Based Learning Terintegrasi STEM Di Era Pandemi Covid-19 Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa [STEM Integrated Problem Based Learning in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era to Improve Students' Critical Thinking Skills],” J. IPA Pembelajaran IPA, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 193–204, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.24815/jipi.v4i2.17859.
E. H. Mohd Shahali, L. Halim, M. S. Rasul, K. Osman, and M. A. Zulkifeli, “STEM Learning through Engineering Design: Impact on Middle Secondary Students’ Interest towards STEM,” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1189–1211, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00667a.
R. Santagata and C. Yeh, “The Role of Perception, Interpretation, and Decision Making in the Development of Beginning Teachers’ Competence,” ZDM, vol. 48, no. 1–2, pp. 153–165, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11858-015-0737-9.
C. Oonk, J. T. M. Gulikers, P. J. den Brok, R. Wesselink, P.-J. Beers, and M. Mulder, “Teachers as Brokers: Adding a University-Society Perspective to Higher Education Teacher Competence Profiles,” High. Educ., vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 701–718, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00510-9.
A. Roberts and D. Cantu, “Applying STEM Instructional Strategies to Design and Technology Curriculum,” in PATT 26 Conference: Technology Education in the 21st Century, 2012, pp. 111–118, [Online]. Available: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/article.asp?issue=073&volume=&article=013.
I. Iskandar, D. Sastradika, J. Jumadi, P. Pujianto, and D. Defrianti, “Development of Creative Thinking Skills Through STEM-Based Instruction in Senior High School Student,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1567, no. 4, p. 042043, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042043.
J. R. Chittum, B. D. Jones, S. Akalin, and Á. B. Schram, “The Effects of an Afterschool STEM Program on Students’ Motivation and Engagement,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 11, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1186/s40594-017-0065-4.
I. Ghergulescu, T. Lynch, M. Bratu, A.-N. Moldovan, C. H. Muntean, and G. M. Muntean, “STEM education with atomic structure virtual lab for learners with special education needs,” in EDULEARN18 Proceedings, 2018, pp. 8747–8752, [Online]. Available: http://www.newtonproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018_EDULEARN_IG.pdf.
M. Timms, K. Moyle, P. Weldon, and P. Mitchell, Challenges in STEM Learning in Australian Schools: Literature and Policy Review. Australian: Australian Council for Educational Research, 2018.
H. S. Budhi and U. Fawaida, “Pengembangan Perangkat dan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Mata Kuliah IPA Terpadu Melalui Pendekatan STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) [Development of Project-Based Learning Devices and Models for Integrated Science Courses through the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Approach],” J. Ilm. Edukasia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 99–111, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.26877/jie.v1i1.7969.
F. Sarnita, A. Fitriani, and W. Widia, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model PBL Berbasis STEM untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berfikir Kreatif Siswa Tuna Netra [Development of STEM-Based PBL Model Learning Tools to Practice Creative Thinking Skills for Blind Students] ,” J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 38–44, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.37630/jpm.v9i1.180.
R. Ardiansyah, D. Diella, and H. Y. Suhendi, “Pelatihan Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Abad 21 dengan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Berbasis STEM Bagi Guru IPA [21st Century Learning Device Development Training with STEM-Based Project Based Learning Model for Science Teachers],” Publ. Pendidik., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 31, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.26858/publikan.v10i1.12172.
W. Maba, “Conducting Assessment Instrument Models for Teacher Competence, Teacher Welfare as an Effort to Enhance Education Quality,” Int. Res. J. Manag. IT Soc. Sci., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 46–52, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.21744/irjmis.v5i3.667.
H. Hikmawati, C. Sahidu, K. Kosim, S. Sutrio, and G. Gunawan, “Tahap Define dalam Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis STEM untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Mahasiswa [Define Stage in the Development of STEM-Based Learning Tools to Improve Students' Higher Order Thinking Skills],” Kappa J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 149–157, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.29408/kpj.v4i2.2666.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Dian Artha Kusumaningtyas, Dwi Sulisworo, Jumadi, Edi Istiyono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in IRiP agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the IRiP right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in IRiP. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in IRiP. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
