Comparison of Euler and Euler-Cromer Numerical Methods for Undamped and Damped Spring Oscillation

Authors

  • Nurul Miftakhul Janah Postgraduate Program of Physics Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Fajrul Falah Postgraduate Program of Physics Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Ratnawati Ratnawati Postgraduate Program of Physics Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Ishafit Ishafit Postgraduate Program of Physics Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6348-483X
  • Wipsar Sunu Brams Dwandaru Department of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9692-4640

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v4i2.4803

Keywords:

Damped Oscillation, Undamped Oscillation, Euler Method, Euler-Cromer Method

Abstract

This study aimed to numerically analyze damped and undamped oscillations of a spring using the Euler and Euler-Cromer methods via Spreadsheet software. The varied parameters in this study were the damping constant, namely 0.1 (damped) and 0.0 (undamped). Various quantities analyzed in this study were position (x), velocity (v), kinetic energy (K), potential energy (U), mechanical energy (E), and phase space as a function of time (t). Iteration was done in t < 60-time steps (seconds). The results of this study indicated that when the spring experiences damping, the numerical results of x, v, K, U, E, and the phase space decrease periodically to zero due to the damping force, both for the Euler and Euler-Cromer methods. Meanwhile, for the undamped spring (zero damping constant), there was a difference in the results for the Euler and Euler-Cromer methods. For the Euler method, the resulting values ​​of x, v, K, U, E, and the phase space increased periodically with time, which was not following the actual situation. According to the simple harmonic oscillation, the Euler-Cromer method values ​​of x, v, K, U, E, and the phase space were stable over time.

References

R. F. Martin, “Undergraduate Computation Physics Education: Uneven History and Promising Future,” XXVII IUPAP, Conference on Computational Physics (CCP2015) 2-5 December 2015, J Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 759, p. 012005, 2016. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/759/1/012005.

X. Wang, C. Guo, D. A. Yuen, and G. Luo, “GeoVReality: A Computational Interactive Virtual Reality Visualization Framework and Workflow for Geophysical Research,” Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, vol. 298, p. 106312, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2019.106312.

M. Bansal, S. Bansal, and R. Kumar, “A Simulation of Two-Body Decay of A Particle and Radioactive Equilibrium States,” Physics Education, vol. 56(5), p. 055007, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1361-6552/ac0159.

N. B. Otojonova and D. B. Tojonova, “The Role of Differential Equation in Physical Exercise,” Pedagogy & Physchology: Theory and Practice, vol. 4(30), pp. 26–30, 2020. https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/1222945.pdf

T. Rabczuk, H. Ren, and X. Zhuang, “A Nonlocal Operator Method for Partial Differential Equations With Application to Electromagnetic Waveguide Problem,” Computers, Materials, & Continua, vol. 59(1), pp. 31-55, 2019. doi: 10.32604/cmc.2019.04567.

R. D. Kaufman, “A First Law Through Experiment With A Second Law Result of Heat Engines Based on A Self-Contained Modified Carnot Cycle,” European Jornal of Physics Education, vol. 10(1), pp. 24–37, 2019. doi: 10.20208/ejpe.v10i1.222.

V. M. Tapilin, “Solving the Schrodinger Equation for Helium-Like Ions With the Method of Configuration Weight Functions,” Journal of Structural Chemistry., vol. 60, pp. 1–6, 2019. doi: 10.1134/S0022476619010013.

J. Li, N. D. Drumond, P. Schuck, and V. Olevano, “Comparing Many-Body Approaches Against the Helium Atom Exact Solution,” SciPost Phys., vol. 6, p. 040, 2019. doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.4.040.

D. C. Giancoli, Fisika: Prinsip dan Aplikasi Jilid 2 [Physics: Principles with Application], Ed. 7. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2014.

M. R. Aulia, “Osilasi Teredam pada Pegas dengan Medium Fluida [Damped Oscillations in A Spring With A Fluid Medium],” Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, vol. 3(1), pp. 22–26, 2018. doi: 10.15575/jotalp.v3i1.6549.

J. Poonyawatpornkul and P. Wattankasiwich, “High-Speed Video Analysis of Damped Harmonic Motion,” Physics Education, vol. 48(6), pp. 782-789, 2013. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/48/6/782.

A. Fauzi, “Analisis Gerak Harmonik Teredam (Damped Harmonic Motion) dengan Spreadsheet Excel [Analysis of Damped Harmonic Motion (Damped Harmonic Motion) With an Excel Spreadsheet],” Orbith, vol. 7(2), pp. 318–322, 2011. https://eprints.uns.ac.id/1713/.

A. Nurdin and S. Hastuti, “Analsis Gerak Osilator Harmonik Teredam Menggunakan Metode Numerik [Analysis of Damped Harmonic Oscillator Motion Using Numerical Method],” Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 3(2), pp. 13-19, 2019. doi: 10.31002/jom.v3i2.3366.

R. Eso, “Simulasi Gerak Osilasi Paksa dengan Redaman Menggunakan Spreadsheet Excel dan Macro Visual Basic for Application [Simulation of Forced Oscillation Motion With Damping Using Excel Spreadsheet and Macro Visual Basic for Application],” Jurnal Aplikasi Fisika, vol. 13(3), pp. 52-55, 2017. http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JAF/article/view/4141/3228

D. U. Sowarno, “Getaran Osilasi Teredam pada Pendulum dengan Magnet dan Batang Aluminium [Damped Oscillating Vibrations on A Pendulum With Magnets and Aluminum Rods],” In Seminar Kontribusi Fisika, ITB, Bandung 2015.

S. Li, P. Xiang, B. Wei, C. Zuo, L. Jiang, and W. He, “Interface Friction Effects on Scaling A Vertical Spring-Viscous Damper Isolation System in A Shaking Table Test,” Structures, vol. 33, pp. 1878-1891, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.046.

N. Maus and F. Gordaninejad, “A Bi-Diretional, Liquid-Spring-Magnetorheological-Fluid-Damper System,” Frontiers in Materials, vol. 6 (6), pp. 1-11, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2019.00006.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles