Implementation of Learning Cycle’s Model Based on SCL (Student-Centered Learning) to Improve Students’ Creative Thinking Ability in Learning Evaluation Subjects at Universitas Almuslim
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v4i1.3052Keywords:
Classroom Action Research, Creative Thinking Skill, Learning Cycle, Student-Centered LearningAbstract
The main problems in conducting this research include 1) The ability of the students to analyze the question was less creative in answering; 2) the students learning activities were still low; 3) the students’ interest and response were still low in the instruction. Those problems that had an impact on the instruction were not a success as individual and classical. Therefore, we need an innovative instruction model in enhancing the learning and teaching process, such as; SCL-based Learning Cycle model. This research was Classroom Action Research (CAR) which consisted of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. This research was the students in the fifth semester in the Physics Education Department that consisted of 21 students. Based on the research results, it was concluded that the implementation of Learning Cycle 5E through SCL-based had improved students’ creative thinking skills, lecturer’s and students’ activities in the teaching and learning process.
References
N. S. Permana, “Peningkatan Mutu Tenaga Pendidik dengan Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru [Improving the Quality of Educators with Teacher Competence and Certification],” Stud. Didakt., vol. 11, no. 01, pp. 1-8., 2017.
S. Makhmudah, “Upaya Memperbaiki Kualitas Guru dengan Memaksimalkan Terpenuhinya Kompetensi Kepribadian dan Profesionalisme Guru [Efforts to Improve Teacher Quality by Maximizing the Fulfillment of Personal Competence and Teacher Professionalism],” J. Stud. Islam, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 80–103, 2016.
L. Leonard, “Kompetensi Tenaga Pendidik di Indonesia: Analisis Dampak Rendahnya Kualitas SDM Guru dan Solusi Perbaikannya [The Competence of Educators in Indonesia: Analysis of the Impact of the Low Quality of Teacher Human Resources and Solutions for Its Improvement],” Form. J. Ilm. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 192–201, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.30998/formatif.v5i3.643.
S. R. Yuliati and I. Lestari, “Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Analysis of Students in Solving HOTS Question in Higher Education,” Perspekt. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 181–188, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.21009/PIP.322.10.
E. Lee and M. J. Hannafin, “A Design Framework for Enhancing Engagement in Student-Centered Learning: Own It, Learn It, and Share It,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 707–734, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11423-015-9422-5.
K. Kaput, “Evidence for Student-Centered Learning.” education evolving, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED581111.pdf.
D. Astriani and N. N. Istiqomah, “Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E: Mengaktifkan Siswa pada Materi Suhu dan Perubahannya [Learning Cycle 5E Model: Enabling Students on Material Temperature and Its Changes],” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 71–75, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.26740/jppipa.v1n2.p71-75.
F. Putra, I. Y. N. Kholifah, B. Subali, and A. Rusilowati, “5E-Learning Cycle Strategy: Increasing Conceptual Understanding and Learning Motivation,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 171–181, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i2.2898.
D. F. Susilaningrum, S. Santosa, and J. Ariyanto, “Comparative Study Between the Application of Learning Cycle 5E and Discovery Learning Models to the Science Process Skill and Cognitive Outcomes in Student Class X SMA Negeri 3 Boyolali,” Proceeding Biol. Educ. Conf., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 331–339, 2017.
R. Runisah, T. Herman, and J. A. Dahlan, “Using the 5E Learning Cycle with Metacognitive Technique to Enhance Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills,” Int. J. Emerg. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 87–98, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.12928/ijeme.v1i1.5698.
D. R. Astrodjojo, “The Development of Teaching Materials Using Learning Cycle 5E to Increase Critical Thinking Skills and Student’s Learning Outcome of High School Students on the Subject of Reaction Rate,” JPPS (Jurnal Penelit. Pendidik. Sains), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1564–1569, 2018, doi: 10.26740/jpps.v8n1.p%25p.
D. Muliyati, Herga Marizka, and F. Bakri, “E-Learning Using Wordpress on Physics Materials with the 5E Learning Cycle Strategy,” J. Penelit. Pengemb. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 101–112, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.21009/1.05205.
M. Wena, Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer Suatu Tinjauan Konseptual Operasional [Contemporary Innovative Learning Strategies An Operational Conceptual Review]. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2009.
I. Emaliana, “Teacher-centered or Student-centered Learning Approach to Promote Learning?,” J. Sos. Hum., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 59–70, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.12962/j24433527.v10i2.2161.
R. Ms., T. Herman, and J. A. Dahlan, “The Enhancement of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Mathematics through The 5E Learning Cycle with Metacognitive Technique,” 2017, doi: 10.2991/icmsed-16.2017.23.
A. Ardian and S. Munadi, “Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Student-Centered Learning dan Kemampuan Spasial terhadap Kreativitas Mahasiswa [Effect of Student-Centered Learning Strategy and Spatial Ability on Student Creativity],” J. Pendidik. Teknol. dan Kejuru., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 454–466, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.21831/jptk.v22i4.7843.
Fatimah, “Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMA Negeri 2 Bireuen pada Materi Kalor melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Open-Ended Problem (Masalah Terbuka) [Efforts to Improve Creative Thinking Skills for Students of SMA Negeri 2 Bireuen on Heat Materials through the Application of the Open-Ended Problem Learning Model],” J. Pendidik. Almuslim, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 85–90, 2017.
M. M. Trianggono, “Analisis Kausalitas Pemahaman Konsep dengan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa pada Pemecahan Masalah Fisika [Causality Analysis of Concept Understanding with Students' Creative Thinking Ability in Physics Problem Solving],” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Keilmuan, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.25273/jpfk.v3i1.874.
M. Nuswowati, E. Susilaningsih, R. Ramlawati, and S. Kadarwati, “Implementation of Problem-Based Learning with Green Chemistry Vision to Improve Creative Thinking Skill and Students’ Creative Actions,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 221–228, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9467.
S. Ndiung, N. Dantes, I. M. Ardana, and A. A. I. N. Marhaeni, “Treffinger Creative Learning Model with RME Principles on Creative Thinking Skill by Considering Numerical Ability,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 731–744, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12344a.
W. M. Bart, B. Hokanson, and I. Can, “An Investigation of the Factor Structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking,” Educ. Sci. Theory Pract., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 515–528, 2017, doi: 10.12738/estp.2017.2.0051.
P. R. Nasution, E. Surya, and E. Syahputra, “Perbedaan Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dan Pembelajaran Konvensional di SMPN 4 Padangsidimpuan [Differences in Improving Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability and Independent Learning of Students in Problem-Based Learning and Conventional Learning at SMPN 4 Padangsidimpuan]." Parad. J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 106, 2016, doi: 10.24114/paradikma.v8i3.3360.
W. O. L. Arisanti, W. Sopandi, and A. Widodo, “Analisis Penguasaan Konsep dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SD Melalui Project Based Learning [Analysis of Concept Mastery and Creative Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students Through Project Based Learning],” EduHumaniora | J. Pendidik. Dasar Kampus Cibiru, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 82–95, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.17509/eh.v8i1.5125.
S. Mahanal and S. Zubaidah, “Model Pembelajaran RICOSRE yang Berpotensi Memberdayakan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif [RICOSRE Learning Model Potentially Empowering Creative Thinking Skills],” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 676–685, 2017, doi: 10.17977/jptpp.v2i5.9180.
N. Ratnaningsih, “The Analysis of Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills and Self-Efficacy of High Students Built Through Implementation of Problem Based Learning and Discovery Learning,” JPMI (Jurnal Pendidik. Mat. Indones., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 42–45, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.26737/jpmi.v2i2.219.
L. J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif [Qualitative Research Methodology], Ed. Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2007.
A. Suharsimi, Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik [Research Procedure: A Practical Approach], Ed. Revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2006.
I. B. Trianto and B. Ibnu, Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif, dan Kontekstual [Designing Innovative, Progressive, and Contextual Learning Models]. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2014.
E. Kusumawati and R. A. Irwanto, “Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Drill untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII SMP [Application of Drill Learning Method to Improve Mathematical Problem Solving Ability of Class VIII Junior High School Students],” EDU-MAT J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 49–57, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.20527/edumat.v4i1.2289.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Fatimah, M. Taufiq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in IRiP agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the IRiP right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in IRiP. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in IRiP. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
