Women’s Discourse in Novel Al-Ḥubb fī Zamān al-Naft: A Corpus-Based Qāsim Amīn Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/insyirah.v9i1.16715Keywords:
Arabic literary corpus, Qāsim Amīn, Nawāl as-Saʿdāwī, Voyant Tools, Women's discourseAbstract
This article examines women’s discourse in Nawāl as-Saʿdāwī’s Al-Ḥubb fī Zamān al-Naft through corpus linguistics-based literary research and Qāsim Amīn’s reformist perspective. The study responds to the limited integration of corpus evidence, textual quotation analysis, and Islamic reformist thought in Arabic literary criticism. It applies to an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design: the first stage produces quantitative corpus evidence, while the second stage provides qualitative interpretation through selected quotations from the novel. The corpus consists of 28,419 tokens and 9,327 types, with a vocabulary density of 0.328, a readability index of 9.818, and a mean sentence length of 29.1 words. Sixty-one quotations were selected through purposive sampling and categorized into six thematic fields. The findings show that women’s discourse is constructed through profession and work, education, hijab, marriage, divorce, and socio-political participation. Profession and work form the dominant discourse with 33 quotations or 54.1%, followed by education and hijab with 10 quotations or 16.4% each, marriage with 5 quotations or 8.2%, divorce with 2 quotations or 3.3%, and socio-political participation with 1 quotation or 1.6%. Close reading of Arabic quotations shows that women are represented as rational, speaking, working, educated, and socially negotiated subjects. The study contributes to Arabic literary studies by demonstrating how corpus-based thematic distribution can guide Qāsim Amīn-based interpretation of women’s discourse in modern Arabic fiction.
References
Addison, C. (2020). Radical feminism and androcide in Nawal El Saadawi’s Woman at Point Zero. English Studies in Africa, 63(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00138398.2020.1852683
al-Saʿdāwī, N. (1993). Al-Ḥubb fī Zamān al-Naft. Dār al-Mustaqbal al-ʿArabī.
Amīn, Q. (2005). The liberation of women and the new woman: Two documents in the history of Egyptian feminism (S. S. Peterson, Trans.) (4. printing). The American University in Cairo Press.
Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: The description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667
Babakhani, A. (2024). Control over Muslim Women’s Bodies: A Critical Review. Sociological Inquiry, 94(1), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12529
Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis (First edition). Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933996
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Buzarna-Tihenea, A. (2020). “Text Analysis Tools in ESP Teaching.” DOAJ Open Global Trusted 20 (2): 252–158. https://doaj.org/article/4716f2bc1aeb45f99cc7c8235b5a325b.
Cohen K. Bretonnel, Hunter Lawrence E., & Pressman Peter S. (2019). P-Hacking Lexical Richness Through Definitions of “Type” and “Token”. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI190470
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd edn). SAGE. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research-3-241842
Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S., & Dascalu, M. (2022). Moving beyond classic readability formulas: New methods and new models for text readability. Journal of Research in Reading, 45(4), 541–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12413
Crosthwaite, P., Ningrum, S., & Schweinberger, M. (2023). Research trends in corpus linguistics: A bibliometric analysis of two decades of Scopus-indexed corpus linguistics research in arts and humanities. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 28(3), 344–377. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21072.cro
Ghorbanpour, F., & Sabbagh, M. R. G. (2024). Incarcerated Power: Tracing Foucault’s Footsteps in Nawal El Saadawi’s Woman at Point Zero. Hawwa, 22(3–4), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1163/15692086-12341422
Gillings, M., Mautner, G., & Baker, P. (2023). Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (1st edn). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009168144
Hammad, H. (2019). In the Shadows of the Middle East’s Wars, Oil, and Peace: The Construction of Female Desires and Lesbianism in Middlebrow Egyptian Literature. Journal of Arabic Literature, 50(2), 148–172. https://doi.org/10.1163/1570064x-12341383
Hartman, M. (2020). “Zahra’s Uncle, or Where Are Men in Women’s War Stories?” Journal of Arabic Literature, 51(1–2), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1163/1570064x-12341401
Hendrigan, H. (2019). “Mixing Digital Humanities and Applied Science Librarianship: Using Voyant Tools to Reveal Word Patterns in Faculty Research.” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no. 9. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl3.
Hetenyi, Gabor. (2019). “Quantitative Analysis of Qualitative Data: Using Voyant Tools to Investigate the Sales-Marketing Interface.” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 12 (3): 393–404. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2929.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Joubert, Estelle. (2021). “Distant Reading in French Music Criticism. Nineteenth-Century Music Review.” Cambridge University Press 19 (2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479409820000476.
Khanna, P. (2020). Techniques and Strategies to Develop Active Listening Skills: The Armour for Effective Communication across Business Organizations. The Achievers Journal: Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 6(3), Article 3.
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Koizumi, R., & In’nami, Y. (2012). Effects of text length on lexical diversity measures: Using short texts with less than 200 tokens. System, 40(4), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.10.012
McGowan, B. S. (2021). Using Text Mining Tools to Inform Search Term Generation: An Introduction for Librarians. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 21(3), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2021.0032
Miller, A. (2018). “Text Mining Digital Humanities Projects: Assessing Content Analysis Capabilities of Voyant Tools.” Journal of Web Librarianship 12 (3): 169–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2018.1479673.
Ming, X. (2018). “Smart Learning Models of Certified Legal Translators and Interpreters in China.” Comparative Legilinguistics 36 (1): 47–64. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2018.36.3.
Musgamy, A., Rusydi, M., & Kurniati, K. (2020). Gender Mainstreaming in Arabic Literature. Jurnal Al Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 12(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.24042/albayan.v12i2.6468
Niu, Z. (2022). Remembering Nawal El Saadawi. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 18(1), 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1215/15525864-9494290
Rather, N. A. (2025). ‘Stories have to be told or they die’: A Critique of the Essentialist Paradigms of Female Genital Mutilation and Religion in Nawal El Saadawi’s Woman at Point Zero (1977). English Studies in Africa, 68(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00138398.2024.2424114
Rebora, S., Boot, P., Pianzola, F., Gasser, B., Herrmann, J. B., Kraxenberger, M., Kuijpers, M. M., Lauer, G., Lendvai, P., Messerli, T. C., & Sorrentino, P. (2021). Digital humanities and digital social reading. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36(Supplement_2), ii230–ii250. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab020
Rosillo-Rodes, P., Miguel, M. S., & Sanchez, D. (2024). Entropy and type-token ratio in gigaword corpora (Version 3). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2411.10227
Sinclair, S., & Rockwell, G. (2016). Voyant Tools. https://voyant-tools.org/
Yousef, H. A. (2022). The Other Legacy of Qasim Amin: The View from 1908. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 54(3), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743822000344
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ferawati Ferawati, Saifulah Samsudin, Muhammad Syukri Abdurrahman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





