THE IMPACT OF WHATSAPP TOWARD UAD UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ BEHAVIOR IN LEARNING PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v1i1.1515Keywords:
Impact, WhatsApp, Undergraduate students, Behavior, Learning process.Abstract
WhatsApp is one of the social media that is used to communicate in the learning process. At present, students cannot be separated from their daily activities away from this social media. This opportunity can be utilized as well as possible by the students. This research was conducted to find out of using WhatsApp toward undergraduate students’ behavior in the teaching and learning process. This study was descriptive qualitative research. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis technique. The data were collected using interviews, observation, and documentation. The aim of this study to analyze the impact of WhatsApp toward undergraduate students’ behavior and to analyze students’ behavior in their learning process. The result of this research showed that are a positive impact on student behavior as it affects the learning process as, students’ sharing knowledge, student preparation for class, attention, student participation in class, student learning, desires to take additional classes or in subject matter and the negative impact such as, students are more focused.
References
Ahad, A. D. (2014). The ‘WhatsApp’dilemma. Convenience or nuisance: ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences (hal. 155). ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing .
Albergotti, R., MacMillan, D., & Rusli, E. M. (2014). Facebook's $19 Billion Deal Sets High Bar. The Wall Street Journal. , pp. A1, A6.
Ali, L. (2018). The Influence of Information Technology on Student's Behavioural Nature in the Class Room. Asian Journal of Education and Training, v4 n2, 102-107.
Alosaimi, F. D. (2016). Smartphone addiction among university students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi medical journal, 37(6)., 675-683.
Alsulami, S. (2016). The Effects of Technology on Learning English as a Foreign Language Among Female EFL Students at Effatt College:An Exploratory Study. Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture. Vol. 12, No. 4, 1-16.
Andrew, N. (2009, November 15). Retrived ZDNet:https://www.zdnet.com/article/smartphone-vs-feature-phone-arms-race-heats-up-which-did-you-buy/
Arteaga Sánchez, R. C. (2014). Students' perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Computers & Education, 70., 138-149.
Asterhan, C. S. (2015). The promise, reality and dilemmas of secondary school teacher–student interactions in Facebook: The teacher perspective. Computers & Education, 85, 134-148.
Bahrani, T. &. (2012). Informal language learning setting: Technology or social interaction? Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(2), 142-149.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Blehch, A. (2014). THE IMPACT OFWHATSAPP MOBILE SOCIAL LEARNING ON THE ACHIEVEMENT AND ATTITUDES OF FEMALE STUDENTS COMPARED WITH FACE TO FACE LEARNING IN THE CLASSROOM. European Scientific Journal vol.10, No.22 ISSN 1857 – 7881, 25.
Bouhnik, D. &. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research. 13, 217-231.
Carroll, J. H. (2002). Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people. In System Sciences. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (hal. 1777-1785). Washington DC: HICSS.
Casanova, M. O. (2009). Propuesta de indicadores para evaluar y promover el aprendizaje cooperativo en un debate virtual [Proposal of indicators to evaluate and promote coopera-tive learning in a virtual debate. Edutec: Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, ISSN-e 1135-9250, N0. 28, 25.
Chan, L. (2005). Web-CT Revolutionized E-learning. Kanada: University of British Columbia - UBC Reports.
Cheung, W. S. (2008). Toward an understanding of why students contribute in asyn-chronous online discussions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 29–50.
Church, K. &. (2013). What’s up with whatsapp?: Comparing mobile instant messaging behav-iors with traditional SMS. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (hal. 352-361). Munich: ACM.
Dashti, F. &. (2015). EFL college students’ attitudes towards mobile learning. International Education Studies, 8(8), 13-20.
Diaz, J. C. (2015). Mobile learning: Perspectives. International Journal of Educa-tional Technology in Higher Education, 12(1), 38-49.
Drago, E. (2015). The Effect of Technology on Face-to-Face Communication. South O'Kelly: Elon University.
Gillingham, M. G. (1999). Technology in teacher preparation: Preparing teachers for the future. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 7(4)., 303-321.
Gomez-Rey, P. B.-N. (2016). The Impact of Cultural Dimensions on Online Learning. Educational Technology and Society, Vol. 19, 14.
Husain, R. &. (2014). Social networking site as a tool to enhance the educational communication between teacher and students. Scholarly Journal of Education, 3(8), 101-105.
Kataria, S. K. (2018). Feasibility, Efectiveness, and Students, attitude toward using WhatsApp in Histology Teaching and Learning. Education Healty Promote, Vol. 7, 158.
Litchfield, A. e. (2007). Directions for m-learning research to enhance active learning. Proceedings ascilite (hal. 59). Singapore: ASCILITE.
Madden, M. L. (2010). Pew Internet and American life project. Washington DC: Pew Research Center.
Mittelmeier, J. R. (2018). The influence of internationalized versus local content on online intercultural collaboration in groups: A randomized control trial study in a statistics course. Computers & Education, 118., 82-95.
Nguyen, L. B. (2015). iPads in higher education - Hype and hope. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1)., 190-203.
O’Hara, K. P. (2014). Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (hal. 1131-1143). New York: ACM.
Olson., P. (2013). Teenagers say goodbye to Facebook and hello to messenger apps. San Francisco: The Guardian.
Pierce, T. (2009). Social anxiety and technology: Face-to-face communication versus technological communica-tion among teens. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), , 1367-1372.
Preston, G. P. (2010). Web-based lecture technologies: Highlighting the changing nature of teaching and learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6)., 717-728.
Rambe, P. &. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4)., 544-561.
Rambe, P. &. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4)., 544-561.
Romero, M. &. (2012). Creativity in collaborative learning across the life span. Creative Education, 3(4), 422-429.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. Internet and Higher Education, 5., 197–211.
Sevillano García, M. L.-C. (2015). Modelos de investigación en contextos ubicuos y móviles en Educación Superior [Research models in ubiquitous and movile contexts in higher education]. Education Siglo XXI, 33(2), , 329-332.
Strijbos, J. W. (2007). Methodological challenges for collaborative learning research. Learning and Instruction, 17(4)., 389-393.
Tang, Y. &. (2017, November 18). Is mobile instant messaging (MIM) useful in education? Examining its technological, pedagogical, and social affordances. Diambil kembali dari Science Direct: http://www.science direct.com/science/article/pii/S0747563216305039
Tillema, H. O.-B. (2006). Constructing knowledge in professional conversations: The role of beliefs on knowledge and knowing. Learning and Instruction, 16, 592-608.
Vaughan. Norman, &. K. (2013). Investigating The Role of Mobile Devices in a Blended Pre-service Teacher Education Program. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 43, No.3, 56-77.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. . Cambridge: Havard University Press.
Williams, A. B. (2012). The impact of online lecture recordings on student performance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2)., 199-213.
World Population Review and Cencus. (2019, June 20). Diambil kembali dari World Population Review: http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/indonesia-population/
Yeboah, J. &. (2014). The impact of whatsApp messenger usage on students in Ghana. Journal of Education and practice, 5(6), 157-164.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UAD. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is identified as to its source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication before acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
Copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above-mentioned paper in whole to UAD. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online), or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors' personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UAD copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UAD endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
