Do cross-border bank mergers and acquisitions lead to greater efficiency? Evidence from Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/fokus.v16i1.14884Abstract
This study investigates whether cross-border mergers and acquisitions enhance the efficiency of Indonesian private commercial banks, an issue that remains inconclusive in the emerging-market literature. The purpose of this research is to assess the impact of foreign ownership on efficiency and identify its key determinants, specifically by testing the validity of efficiency and synergy theories in an emerging market context. Quarterly financial data from 2017 to 2024 for 10 banks, 5 foreign-acquired and 5 non-acquired, are analyzed. Bank efficiency is measured using data envelopment analysis, which assesses technical, pure technical, and scale efficiency. To estimate causal effects, propensity score matching combined with a difference-in-differences approach is used, while Tobit regression is used to examine determinants of efficiency. The results show that cross-border mergers and acquisitions do not lead to statistically significant overall efficiency gains, despite heterogeneous effects across individual banks. Furthermore, bank size has a significant negative effect on efficiency, while profitability and capital adequacy exhibit mixed effects. These findings suggest that foreign acquisitions do not automatically improve bank efficiency, highlighting post-merger integration challenges. Theoretically, this study contributes by challenging the synergy theory, demonstrating that ownership transformation does not automatically yield operational synergies, and enriching the banking efficiency literature with a robust, high-frequency framework. In practice, these insights serve as a crucial strategic guideline for bank management to prioritize post-merger cultural and operational integration over simple scale expansion, while also assisting financial regulators in formulating more prudent cross-border banking acquisition policies.
References
Adesina, K. S. (2019). Bank technical, allocative and cost efficiencies in Africa: The influence of intellectual capital. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 48, 419-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2019.03.009
Ahmed, R., Chen, Y., Benjasak, C., Gregoriou, A., Alrwashdeh, N. N. F., & Than, E. T. (2023). The performance of bidding companies in merger and acquisition deals: An empirical study of domestic acquisitions in Hong Kong and Mainland China. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 87, 168-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.09.003
Akhtar, Q., & Nosheen, S. (2022). The impact of fintech and banks M&A on Acquirer's performance: A strategic win or loss?. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(6), 1195-1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.08.007
Al-Khasawneh, J. A., Essaddam, N., & Hussain, T. (2020). Total productivity and cost efficiency dynamics of US merging banks: A non-parametric bootstrapped analysis of the fifth merger wave. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 78, 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.02.002
Anagnostopoulos, Y., Alexandrou, G., & Thomas, H. M. (2024). European banking M&As: The role of financial advisors. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 63(4), 1193-1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11156-024-01287-Z
Arfianto, S. A., Suhana, S., Pradita, N., Ali, S., & Sam, T. H. (2025). Transformational leadership and employee efficiency: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Jurnal Fokus Manajemen Bisnis, 15(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.12928/fokus.v15i1.12509
Badunenko, O., Dadoukis, A., Fusi, G., & Simper, R. (2022). The impact of efficiency on asset quality in banking. The European Journal of Finance, 28(6), 596-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1946117
Bertay, A. C., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2013). Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(4), 532-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2013.02.002
Chakraborty, B., & Das, A. K. (2024). Mergers and acquisitions in the banking sector: A systematic literature review. Vision, 09722629241275326. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629241275326
Chiaramonte, L., Dreassi, A., Piserà, S., & Khan, A. (2023). Mergers and acquisitions in the financial industry: A bibliometric review and future research directions. Research in International Business and Finance, 64, 101837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101837
Chortareas, G. E., Girardone, C., & Ventouri, A. (2012). Bank supervision, regulation, and efficiency: Evidence from the European Union. Journal of Financial Stability, 8(4), 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2011.12.001
Claessens, S., Coleman, N., & Donnelly, M. (2018). “Low-For-Long” interest rates and banks’ interest margins and profitability: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 35, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2017.05.004
Dar, A. H., Mathur, S. K., & Mishra, S. (2021). The efficiency of Indian banks: A DEA, Malmquist and SFA analysis with bad output. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 19(4), 653-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-021-00247-x
Delis, M. D., Iosifidi, M., Kazakis, P., Ongena, S., & Tsionas, M. G. (2022). Management practices and M&A success. Journal of Banking & Finance, 134, 106355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106355
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Pedraza, A., & Ruiz-Ortega, C. (2021). Banking sector performance during the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 133, 106305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106305
Duan, Y., Fan, X., Li, X., Rong, Y., & Shi, B. (2021). Do efficient banks create more liquidity: International evidence. Finance Research Letters, 42, 101919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101919
Fang, Z., Chen, Y., Chen, L., & Chiu, Y. H. (2025). Bank efficiency estimation considering enterprise risk: entropy meta two parallel three-stage dynamic DDF model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1728. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05991-6
Fonseka, M., & Al Farooque, O. (2024). Banking efficiency, ownership types, and operations: A quasi-natural experiment of conventional and Islamic banks. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 97, 101882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2024.101882
Gržeta, I., Žiković, S., & Tomas Žiković, I. (2023). Size matters: Analyzing bank profitability and efficiency under the Basel III framework. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00412-y
Gulamhussen, M. A., Hennart, J. F., & Pinheiro, C. M. (2016). What drives cross-border M&As in commercial banking?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 72, S6-S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.07.007
Hakimi, F., Maf'ula, F., & Gultom, R. Z. (2024). Pre-and post-merger efficiency of Islamic state-owned bank: A case study of Bank Syariah Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 10(1), 471-490. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol10.iss1.art25
Henriques, I. C., Sobreiro, V. A., Kimura, H., & Mariano, E. B. (2018). Efficiency in the Brazilian banking system using data envelopment analysis. Future Business Journal, 4(2), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2018.05.001
Irwin, K., Gilstrap, C., McDowell, W., Drnevich, P., & Gorbett, A. (2022). How knowledge and uncertainty affect strategic international business investment decisions: Implications for cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business Research, 139, 831-842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.001
Khan, A., & Gulati, R. (2021). Efficiency of microfinance institutions of South Asia: a bootstrap DEA approach. International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, 11(1), 84-104. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijcee.2021.10033213
Lee, C. C., Hsieh, M. F., & Yang, S. J. (2016). The effects of foreign ownership on competition in the banking industry: The key role of financial reforms. Japan and the World Economy, 37, 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2016.02.002
Mercan, M., Reisman, A., Yolalan, R., & Emel, A. B. (2003). The effect of scale and mode of ownership on the financial performance of the Turkish banking sector: Results of a DEA-based analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 37(3), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00045-9
Omrani, H., Shamsi, M., Emrouznejad, A., & Teplova, T. (2023). A robust DEA model under discrete scenarios for assessing bank branches. Expert systems with applications, 219, 119694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119694
Oukil, A. (2024). Devising the best prospective merger plan for a banking sector through a hybrid DEA-based methodology: An inverse DEA perspective. In Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis in Business, Finance, and Sustainability: Recent Trends and Developments (pp. 273-306). https://doi.org/10.1142/9781800615786_0009
Paulet, E., & Mavoori, H. (2021). Cross-regional analysis of banking efficiency drivers. Applied Economics, 53(18), 2042-2065. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1855312
Phung, Q. T., Van Vu, H., & Tran, H. P. (2022). Do non-performing loans impact bank efficiency?. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102393. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1855312
Pinto, C. F., Ferreira, M. P., Falaster, C., Fleury, M. T. L., & Fleury, A. (2017). Ownership in cross-border acquisitions and the role of government support. Journal of World Business, 52(4), 533-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.08.004
Proença, C., Augusto, M., & Murteira, J. (2023). The effect of earnings management on bank efficiency: Evidence from ECB-supervised banks. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103450
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
Saleh, M. (2022). Indonesian banking performance of pre and post of mergers and acquisitions. Trikonomika, 21(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.23969/trikonomika.v21i1.3934
Samad, A., & Armstrong, V. S. (2022). Bootstrap-DEA management efficiency and early prediction of bank failure: Evidence from 2008-2009 US bank failures. Central Bank Review, 22(3), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2022.08.002
Shaban, M., & James, G. A. (2018). The effects of ownership change on bank performance and risk exposure: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Banking & Finance, 88, 483-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.02.002
Shabir, M., Jiang, P., Wang, W., & Işık, Ö. (2023). COVID-19 pandemic impact on banking sector: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 67, 100784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2023.100784
Skvarciany, V., & Jurevičienė, D. (2024). Measuring efficiency of commercial banks and other deposit institutions: DEA-Malmquist approach. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(4), 1547-1582. https://doi.org/10.24136/OC.3179
Steigenberger, N. (2017). The challenge of integration: A review of the M&A integration literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 408-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12099
Sufian, F., & Habibullah, M. S. (2010). Does economic freedom fosters banks’ performance? Panel evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 6(2), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2010.09.003
Tsionas, M. G., & Baltas, K. N. (2022). On identifying risk-adjusted efficiency gains or losses of prospective mergers and acquisitions. Annals of Operations Research, 318(1), 619-683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04826-w
Wang, K., Huang, W., Wu, J., & Liu, Y. N. (2014). Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA. Omega, 44, 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.005
Wang, Y., Chen, L., & Cui, M. (2024). What explains the operational efficiency of listed commercial banks in China? Evidence from a three-stage DEA-tobit modeling analysis. Heliyon, 10(13). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33716
Wendha, D. N., & Alteza, M. (2020). Analisis efisiensi perbankan hasil merger di Indonesia dengan metode two-stage data envelopment analysis. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 17(2), 85-97.. https://doi.org/10.21831/jim.v17i2.34778
Wheelock, D. C., & Wilson, P. W. (2012). Do large banks have lower costs? New estimates of returns to scale for US banks. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44(1), 171-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00472.x
Yuan, C., Jiang, H., & Chen, C. (2023). Differences in returns to cross-border and domestic mergers and acquisitions: Empirical evidence from China using PSM-DID. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103961. https://doi.org/10.12928/fokus.v15i1.12011
Zhu, W., & Hatakeda, T. (2023). Changes in stock return synchronicity and risk composition of banking acquirers an investigation from the perspective of bank opacity. In Finance Seminar. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4645467
Zhu, W. (2023). The impact of technology-driven M&A on bank opacity, stock price synchronicity, and risk composition: Empirical evidence from Japan and a causality analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4645467
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rudi Kurniawan, Dominicus Savio Priyarsono, Widodo Ramadyanto, Tania Chusna Azzahra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Â
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).




