Peer Review Process

All manuscripts are checked by qualified peer review and the authors are subject to blind-peer review whose identities will remain anonymous. The peer review process will be done after the initial screening by the consulting editors of the editorial board. The reviewers, who will perform the blind-peer reviews, comprise renowned national and international academicians and practitioners specializing in various medical sciences generated from basic sciences, clinical, and community or public health research to integrate researches in all aspects of human health fields.
  1. Editor receives manuscript
  2. Reviewers read and provide comments to the editor
  3. The decision is made by the reviewer: accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject
  4. Feedback sent to an author
  5. Revisions
  6. Final decision
  7. Article is published

Submitted papers are evaluated by at least two anonymous referees for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation (blind peer review). The Editor shall inform authors of the review results as soon as possible, typically within 30 to 60 days.

Plagiarism detection of articles in this journal is carried out using iThenticate (Web Checker), Turnitin, or other plagiarism detection tools. Mendeley is used as the reference management tool. The language of publication in this journal is English.