Antinomy of Multiple Interpretations of Very Urgent Reason in The Marriage Dispensation in Indonesia

Anantya Aliyya Arkanbariq

doi:10.12928/adlp.v4i1.9379

Authors

Anantya Aliyya Arkanbariq Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/adlp.v4i1.9379

Keywords:

Antinomy, Marriage Dispensation, Multi-Interpretation

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the purpose of marriage dispensation in Indonesia and the antinomy of multiple interpretations of very urgent reasons in the regulation of marriage dispensation in Indonesia. This research is an empirical normative research that focuses on examining the antinomy in the regulation of marriage dispensation in Indonesia based on primary and secondary data that has been determined. This research use conceptual approach, statutory approach, and case approach with descriptive-qualitative method. The research found that the reason for the existence of marriage dispensation in the Indonesian marriage legal framework is to provide a way out for couples who are forced to marry before the age of 19 due to urgent reasons. The research also found that there are at least two antinomies as result of the lack of clear parameters and guidelines for judges regarding the reasons for urgency, namely between legal certainty and justice and between expediency and judge objectivity. To suppress the existence of antinomies that are too extreme, at least the government must regulate several things as parameters and guidelines that limit judges in interpreting very urgent reasons, including certain circumstances that absolutely cannot be granted dispensation, the minimum age limit for granting marriage dispensation for marriages where no previous pregnancy has occurred, and judges must ensure that the prospective bride and groom are underage to understand the rights, obligations, and risks of being husband and wife. Therefore, this research contributes to the development of science, especially in the field of law, by discovering the existence of antinomy as a result of the broad authority of judges in interpreting the reasons that are very urgent in the regulation of marriage dispensation in Indonesia and providing solutions to overcome the antinomy that is too extreme on these issues.

References

Alam, N. (2021). Dinamika Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penetapan Dispensasi Nikah di Pengadilan Agama Enrekang. IAIN Parepare.

Al-Asy’ari, A. M. (2019). Hukum Nikah Siri (1st ed.). Deepublish.

Alexy, R. (2015). Legal Certainty and Correctness. Ratio Juris, 28(4), 441–451.

Eddyono, S. W., Sahara, F. V., Ayuningtyas, A., Ridwan, A. S. Y., Sinaga, Y. M. S., Anie, D. P. V. S., & Harini, N. S. (2021). Perubahan Pengaturan Usia Minimum Perkawinan, Dispensasi Perkawinan, dan Praktiknya di Indonesia (1st ed.). Yayasan Pemberdayaan PEKKA.

Feis, G. (2020). In Concreto Antinomies, Predictability, and Lawmaking. Ratio Juris, 33(4), 399–429.

Habibi, A. R. (2022). Dialektika Pembuktian Alasan Mendesak Dalam Dispensasi Nikah dan Korelasinya Terhadap Kepentingan Terbaik bagi Anak. Pengadilan Agama Giri Menang,(April), 1–5.

Hakim, S. A. H. (2020). Terjemah Mabadi’ Al-Awwaliyyah: Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Memahami Ushul Fiqh dan Kaidah Fiqh (1st ed.). Literasi Nusantara.

Hardianti, R., & Nurwati, N. (2020). Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Pernikahan Dini Pada Perempuan. Focus: Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 3(2), 111–120.

Judiasih, S. D., Suparto, S., Afriana, A., & Yuanitasari, D. (2017). Dispensasi Pengadilan Telaah Penetapan Pengadilan Atas Permohonan Perkawinan Dibawah Umur. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER, 3(2).

Kurniawan, M. B., & Refiasari, D. (2022). Penafsiran Makna “Alasan Sangat Mendesak” Dalam Penolakan Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin. In Jurnal Yudisial (Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 83–98).

Lago, Y., Ginting, Y. P., & Sugianto, F. (2023). Dilema Keadilan Hukum Antara Hukum Tidak Tertulis Yang Hidup (Ongeschreven Recht) dan Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Aspek Filo-Sofis. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 19, 71–84.

Mahrus, A., Rofiah, N., Wahid, A., Muzayyanah, I., & Eddyono, S. W. (2023). Fondasi Keluarga Sakinah (A. K. Anwar, Ed.; 1st ed.). Seksi Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam Kantor Kementerian Agama Bantul.

Marin Castan, M. L. (2018). The Controversial Decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the Gard Case and Others gainst the United Kingdom. Rev. Bioetica & Derecho, 43, 261.

Marwa, M. H. M. (2021). Mitigasi Bencana Perkawinan Anak Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Keluarga Sakinah: Perspektif Fikih Perlindungan Anak. Veritas et Justitia. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i2.4314

Mashdurohatun, A., Mutalip, A., Kusriyah, S., & Rofiq, A. (2023). Reconstruction of Application for Marriage Dispensation Regulation in Religious Court Based on Islamic Justice. JL Pol’y & Globalization, 132, 67.

Massa, M. (2023). The" Dual Preliminarity" Doctrine in the Case Law of Ordinary Courts of First Instance and Appeals. Italian J. Pub. L., 15, 25.

Mochtar, Z. A., & Hiariej, E. O. S. (2023). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas, dan Filsafat Hukum. Rajawali Pers.

Muqaffi, A., Rusdiyah, R., & Rahmi, D. (2021). Menilik Problematika Dispensasi Nikah Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Pernikahan Anak Pasca Revisi UU Perkawinan. Journal of Islamic and Law Studies, 5(2), 361–377.

Počuča, M. B., Krstinić, D. M., & Šarkić, N. (2023). Prohibition of Minor Marriages. Kultura Polisa, 20(2), 101–129.

Prabawati, T. D., & Rusdiana, E. (2019). Kajian Yuridis Mengenai Alasan Pengajuan Dispensasi Kawin Dikaitkan Dengan Asas-Asas Perlindungan Anak. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 6(3), 1–10.

Rifandanu, F., & Febrianti, A. (2023). Early Marriage and Implications for Future Orientation in Islamic Law. Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society, 2(2), 187–214.

Rohman, T., Mahsus, M., Abduh, M., & Arnone, G. (2023). Preventing Violations of Religious and Social Norms: Judicial Interpretation of “Urgent Reasons” in Marriage Dispensation at The Wonosari Religious Court, Indonesia. J. Islamic L., 4, 218.

Saldana, J., Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Unite States of America: SAGE Publication.

Salim, A. A., Anggriawan, R., & Arumbinang, M. H. (2022). Dilemma of Dual Citizenship Issues in Indonesia: A Legal and Political Perspective. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7, 101.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (17th ed.). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Susanti, D., & Sari, W. M. (2018). Hubungan Tingkat Pendidikan Perempuan dan Orang Tua Dengan Pernikahan Perempuan Usia Dini. Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 3(1), 35.

Tiwari, I. (2023). Law and Morality: Connections and Distinctions. Indian J. Integrated Rsch. L., 3, 1.

Vermeule, A. (2023). Reason and Fiat in the Jurisprudence of Justice Alito. Harv. JL & Pub. Pol’y Per Curiam, 1.