Administrative Appeal Efforts in Indonesian Administrative Dispute Resolution After the Government Administration Law (Pre-Omnibus Law)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/adlp.v2i2.6251Keywords:
Administrative Effort, Procedural Process, State Administrative CourtAbstract
Administrative effort is an effort to resolve disputes in the Indonesian State Administrative Court. This administrative effort changed after the Omnibus Law was introduced. However, the Omnibus Law itself will be changed in the future because there is a demand for a constitutional court decision. Therefore, administrative efforts have the potential to change back to what it was before the Omnibus Law. This study aims to determine the competence of existing changes in administrative efforts. This research method is carried out using a normative approach that is based on browsing library materials or secondary data. The result to be achieved in this research is to give a prescription that Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration has its own procedural process, even though this Law is sectoral.
References
Arniti, N. K. A., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Suryani, L. P. (2019). Penyelesaian Permohonan Fiktif Positif untuk Mendapatkan Keputusan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 1(8), 265–270.
Arzhi Jiwantara, F. (2019). Upaya Administratif Dalam Perspektif Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 Dan Penerapannya Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi. Jatiswara, 34(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.29303/jatiswara.v34i2.203
Hasanah, S. (2016). Alur Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/alur-penyelesaian-sengketa-tata-usaha-negara-lt581327c457099
Heriyanto, B. (2018). Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Berdasarkan Paradigma Uu No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Palar | Pakuan Law Review, 4(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.33751/.v4i1.784
Jaelani, A. Q. J. (2017). Kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Mengadili Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Negatif dan Fiktif Positif. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 6(2). http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/syariah/Supremasi/article/viewFile/2019/1495
Jannah, M. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Pemerintah Sebelum Terbitnya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 (Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Islam) [UIN AlauddinMakassar]. http://repositori.uin-alauddin.ac.id/id/eprint/20276
Koraag, S., Sarapun, R. M. S., & Syamsia, M. (2021). Terjadinya Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Akibat Dikeluarkannya Keputusan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara. 9(7), 75–85.
Mertokusumo, S. (1985). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (2nd ed.). Liberty.
Pandeiroot, E. G. E., Prayogo, P., & Gerungan, C. A. (2021). Upaya Administratif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Di Tinjau Dari Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Lex Administratum, IX(2), 15–25.
Riza, D. (2019). Hakikat KTUN Menurut Undang-Undang Peradlan Tata Usaha Negara Vs Undang- Undang Admnistrasi Pemerintahan. SOUMATERA LAW REVIEW, 2(2), 207–220. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v2i2.3566
Rumokoy, N. K. (2012). Peran P.Tun Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, 20(2), 126–139. http://repo.unsrat.ac.id/242/1/PERAN_P.TUN_DALAM_PENYELESAIAN_SENGKETA_TATA_USAHA_NEGARA(NIKE_K._RUMOKOY).pdf
Safitri, E. D., & Sa, N. (2021). Penerapan Upaya Administratif Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.34-45
Soemarjono, & Erliyana, A. (1999). Tuntunan Praktek Beracara di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. PT. Pramedya Pustaka.
Sugiharto, H., & Abrianto, B. O. (2018). Upaya Administratif Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Arena Hukum, 11(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01001.2
Sumakul, T. F., & Paransi, E. N. (2021). Upaya Administratif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa tata Usaha Negara Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administratif Pemerintahan. Lex Administratum, 9(6), 167–177.
Tobrani, R. (2018). Pengujian Keputusan Oleh Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Diskresi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pejabat Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 13(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v13i1.694
Triartha Yuliani, E. (2020). Perbandingan Antara Konsep Fiktif Negatif Dalam Uu 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dengan Konsep Fiktif Positif Dalam Uu 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23441
Wicaksono, D. A., Kurniawan, D., & Hantoro, B. F. (2020). Diskursus Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Mengadili Perbuatan Pemerintah Dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 9(3), 367. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i3.512
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Rizal Sirojudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read the Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective Author Guidelines at http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/adlp/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with the Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
