Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Instruksional terhadap Kinerja Guru Produktif pada Pendidikan Vokasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jimp.v6i1.16455Keywords:
Kepemimpinan Instruksional, Kinerja Guru Produktif, Pendidikan VokasiAbstract
Tuntutan penyelarasan lulusan dengan standar industri mengharuskan adanya peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran yang konsisten, namun realitas di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa optimalisasi kinerja guru sering kali terhambat oleh lemahnya arahan pedagogis yang sistematis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh kepemimpinan instruksional kepala sekolah terhadap kinerja guru produktif dalam konteks pendidikan vokasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain survei eksplanatori. Populasi dan sampel mencakup seluruh 148 guru produktif yang bertugas di sekolah berakreditasi A. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner berskala Likert lima poin pada periode Maret hingga April 2026. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) dengan bantuan perangkat lunak SmartPLS 4. Hasil pengujian hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa kepemimpinan instruksional berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja guru produktif (β = 0,210; t = 2,488; p = 0,013). Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa penetapan visi akademik, supervisi pembelajaran berbasis bukti, dan penciptaan iklim kolaboratif secara langsung mendorong peningkatan akuntabilitas pedagogis guru. Simpulan penelitian menegaskan bahwa optimalisasi kinerja guru produktif tidak dapat dicapai tanpa kepemimpinan instruksional yang sistematis dan berorientasi pada mutu pembelajaran autentik.
References
Arifin, Y., Rustandi, Y., & Rahayu, K. (2024). Kinerja Guru Ditinjau dari Servant Leadership Kepala Sekolah dan Kompetensi Guru di SMK Pasundan Kota Bandung dan Cimahi. Scientific Journal of Reflection, 7(4), 973–982. https://doi.org/10.37403/sjr.v7i4.2024
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2023). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6 (ed.)). Pearson.
Elfira, Rasdiana, Fitrawati, Jasman, M. W., Reski, K., Anwar, A., & Enaldi. (2024). How does principal’s instructional leadership shape teacher performance mediated by teacher self-efficacy in Indonesian education context? Frontiers in Education, 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1401394
Field, A. (2023). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (6 (ed.)). Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/discovering-statistics-using-ibm-spss-statistics/book283870
Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Squares (PLS).
Ghozali, I. (2023). Structural Equation Modeling: Metode alternatif dengan Partial Least Squares (PLS) (6 (ed.)). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Grootenboer, P., Edwards-Groves, C., & Renshaw, P. (2023). Cultivating collaborative instructional cultures: How leadership shapes teacher innovation in secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 124, 103982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103982
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3 (ed.)). Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/a-primer-on-partial-least-squares-structural-equation-modeling-pls-sem/book26844
Hallinger, P. (2025). Four decades of PIMRS: Reflections on the evolution of instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432251327800
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning in vocational contexts. Routledge.
He, P., Guo, F., & Abazie, G. A. (2024). School principals’ instructional leadership as a predictor of teacher’s professional development. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00290-0
König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2023). Industrial literacy and curriculum co-design: How teacher competence enables equitable participation in school-industry collaboration. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(3), 312–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2189456
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2023). Seven Strong Claims about Leadership for Learning: An Updated Review. School Leadership & Management, 43(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2151234
Lestari, R. (2025). Authentic vocational teaching performance indicators in Indonesian SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 14(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpi.v14i2.2025
Louis, K. S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2023). From bureaucratic management to instructional leadership: Sustaining teacher performance in evolving school ecosystems. Educational Administration Quarterly, 59(2), 245–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X221145678
Mulyasa, E. (2023). Manajemen Kinerja Guru: Teori, Praktik, dan Implikasi bagi Pendidikan Vokasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nugroho, A. (2023). Implementasi link and match dalam tata kelola pendidikan vokasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i1.47324
OECD. (2023). Competency frameworks for teachers in vocational education and training. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/vet-teachers-2023-en
Pont, B. (2023). Leadership for learning in vocational schools: Strategic resource orchestration and curriculum alignment. In OECD Education Working Papers. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8a9b3c45-en
Richter, N. F., Hauff, S., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2023). Thresholds and model fit in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for robust educational research. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12345.67890
Statistik, B. P. (2026). Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka berdasarkan tingkat pendidikan, 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka-berdasarkan-tingkat-pendidikan-2025
Stronge, J. H. (2021). Qualities of effective teachers (3rd (ed.)). ASCD. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315851735
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/rdx8f
Teicher, J., & Yasukawa, K. (2023). Boundary spanning in vocational education: How school leaders translate industry demands into pedagogical practice. Journal of Education and Work, 36(5), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2023.2201234
Tian, M., & Huber, S. G. (2023). Instructional leadership mechanisms and teacher agency: A meta-synthesis of empirical studies. Educational Research Review, 39, 100512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100512
UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2024). Teaching factory implementation confidence: Technical foundation and industry ecosystem understanding among vocational teachers. UNESCO Publishing. https://unevoc.unesco.org/pub/teaching-factory-confidence-2024.pdf
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yeni Suryani, Haeruddin Haeruddin, Widyatmike Gede Mulawarman, Moh Bahzar, Akhmad Akhmad, Usfandi Haryaka

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This article's copyright is transferred to Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) if and when the item is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UAD. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the article is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material identified as to its source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication before acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
Copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above-mentioned paper in whole to UAD. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online), or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the co-author(s) assent where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the author's personal use or company use, provided that the source and the UAD copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UAD endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the documents themselves are not offered for sale.
Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or different types of re-use.




