Investigation on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods Application in Sustainable Product Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/spekta.v3i1.5962Keywords:
Sustainability, Sustainable Product design, Multi Criteria Decision Making, Literature review, product life cycleAbstract
Background: Integrating sustainability development' aspects in the design process is becoming, a growth area in companies. Consequently, sustainable product design has to consider the different aspects of sustainability throughout its life cycle phases in addition of other requirements. This integration is becoming more complicated due the difficulty of managing the constraints and alternatives related to the product and stakeholders needs. This study aims to highlights the most used Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) tools and methods used in sustainable product design process.
Contribution: Product design process involves interesting decisional tasks such as the choice of materials, standard parts, technical solutions. Hence, the contribution of this work is to help designer to adopt relevant MCDM tools and methods that can be integrated to other tools to facilitate and to justify their decisional tasks.
Method: Several methods have been affected to solve the problems related to this complexity such as MCDM. A literature review was conducted based on Siencedirect and GoogleScholar articles databases. After filtering more than 200 articles only 62 articles were considered to analyze the correlation between sustainable product design and MCDM.
Results: Classified MCDM use according to the type of choices to achieve SPD goals. This paper allowed us to find matches between MCDM methods and SPD problem. The majority of case studies result show that a large portion of sustainable design methods, techniques, and tools are applied to the sustainable product’ along its different life cycle phases
Conclusion: It is noticed that the use of MCDM methods are an important outcome in the sustainable product design process and deeply helps designers to make suitable choices. Also, several matches relating MCDM, other methods and sustainable product design sphere are discussed
References
Kim, K. Y., Haapala, K. R., Okudan Kremer, G. L. E., Murat, E. A., Chinnam, R. B., Monplaisir, L. F. (2011). A conceptual framework for a sustainable product development collaboratory to support integrated sustainable design and manufacturing. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (ASME’11), Washington, DC, USA, August, 28-31, 54860, 1097-1103.
Zhang, X., Zhang, L., Fung, K. Y., Bakshi, B. R., Ng, K. M. (2020). Sustainable product design: A life-cycle approach. Chemical Engineering Science, 217, 115508.
Peng, Z., He, L., Xie, Y., Song, W., Liu, J., Ming, X., Goh, M. (2022). A Pythagorean fuzzy ANP-QFD-Grey relational analysis approach to prioritize design requirements of sustainable supply chain. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 42(4), 3893-3907.
Fung, Y. N., Chan, H. L., Choi, T. M., Liu, R. (2021). Sustainable product development processes in fashion: Supply chains structures and classifications. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107911.
Saraf, C., Agrawal, S., Barodiya, D., Shrivastava, P., Verma, T.N. (2022). AHP-based Identification of Tools for Sustainable Product Development. In: Verma, P., Samuel, O.D., Verma, T.N., Dwivedi, G. (eds) Advancement in Materials, Manufacturing and Energy Engineering, Vol. II. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 543-552, Springer, Singapore.
WCED, R. (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common future. http://www.ask-force.org/web/Sustainability/Brundtland-Our-Common-Future-1987-2008.pdf, Accessed april, 22, 2021
Ceschin, F., Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Design for sustainability: An evolutionary review. Proceedings of Design Research Society Conference (DRS’2016), Brighton, UK, June, 27- 30.
Ahmad, S., Wong, K.Y., Tseng, M.L., Wong, W.P. (2018). Sustainable product design and development: A review of tools, applications and research prospects. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 49-61
Neelam, C., Tanvir, S., Amit, K. (2014). Sustainable product design: A review; International Journal of Electronics & Communication Technology, 5(Spl-1), 49-52, http://www.iject.org/vol5/spl1/neelam.pdf
Purvis, B., Mao, Y., Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability science, 14(3), 681-695.
Hosseinpour, A., Peng, Q., Gu, P. (2015). A benchmark-based method for sustainable product design. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(4), 643-664
Vallet, F., Eynard, B., Millet, D., Mahut, S.G., Tyl, B., Bertoluci, G. (2013). Using eco-design tools: An overview of experts’ practices. Design Studies, 34(3), 345-377.
Azapagic, A., Millington, A., Collett, A. (2006). A Methodology for Integrating Sustainability Considerations into Process Design. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 84(6), 439–452
Thomas, A. (2009). Design and sustainable development: what is the contribution that design can make? A case study of the Welsh Woollen Industry. In Undisciplined! Proceeding of Design Research Society Conference, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK, July, 16-19.
Kyratsis, P., Efkolidis, N., Tsagaris, A. (2012). CAD based material selection for sustainable design. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 1(8), 54-59
Renzi, C., Leali, F., Di Angelo, L. (2017). A review on decision-making methods in engineering design for the automotive industry. Journal of Engineering Design, 28(2), 118-143.
Schade, J., Olofsson, T., Schreyer, M. (2011). Decision-making in a model-based design process. Construction management and Economics, 29(4), 371-382.
Moghtadernejad, S., Chouinard, L. E., Mirza, M. S. (2018). Multi-criteria decision-making methods for preliminary design of sustainable facades. Journal of Building Engineering, 19, 181-190
Anojkumar, L., Ilangkumaran, M., Hassan, S.M. (2016). An integrated hybrid multi-criteria decision making technique for material selection in the sugar industry. International Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Making, 6(3), 247-268
Jahan, A., Edwards, K.L., Bahraminasab, M. (2016). Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of engineering materials in product design. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2nd Edition.
Loganathan, A., Mani, I. (2018). A fuzzy based hybrid multi criteria decision making methodology for phase change material selection in electronics cooling system. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 2943-2950.
Steenis, N.D., Van Der Lans, I.A., Van Herpen, E., Van Trijp, H.C. (2018). Effects of sustainable design strategies on consumer preferences for redesigned packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 854-865.
Buchert, T., Neugebauer, S., Schenker, S., Lindow, K., Stark, R. (2015). Multi-criteria decision making as a tool for sustainable product development–Benefits and obstacles. Procedia CIRP, 26, 70-75.
Mosavi, A. (2013). A multi-criteria decision making environment for engineering design and production decision-making. International Journal of Computer Applications, 69(1), 26-38.
Guini, F., El Barkany, A., Jabri, A., Irhirane, E.H. (2018). An Approach for the Evaluation of a Product's Process Planning during the Design Phase through a Group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 38, 154-162. Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
Vinodh, S., Rathod, G. (2010). Integration of ECQFD and LCA for sustainable product design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(8), 833-842.
Rezaei, J., Papakonstantinou, A., Tavasszy, L., Pesch, U., Kana, A. (2019). Sustainable product-package design in a food supply chain: A multi-criteria life cycle approach. Packaging Technology and Science, 32(2), 85-101.
Sansa, M., Badreddine, A., Romdhane, T.B. (2019). A new approach for sustainable design scenarios selection: A case study in a Tunisian company. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 587-607.
Bouyarmane, H., Sallaou, M. (2019). Environmental assessment in the early stages of product design. In 5th International Conference on Optimization and Applications. ENSA Kenitra, Maroc, April, 25-26.
Karatas, M. (2017). Multiattribute decision making using multiperiod probabilistic weighted fuzzy axiomatic design. Systems Engineering, 20(4), 318-334.
Singh, P.K., Sarkar, P. (2020). A framework based on fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL for sustainable product development: A case of Indian automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 118991
Chandrakumar, C., Kulatunga, A.K., Mathavan, S. (2017). A multi-criteria decision-making model to evaluate sustainable product designs based on the principles of Design for Sustainability and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. In Giampaolo Campana, G., Howlett R. J., Setchi R. and Cimatti B., (Eds), Proceeding of the International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing (pp. 347-354). Springer, Cham
Badurdeen, F., Aydin, R., Brown, A. (2018). A multiple lifecycle-based approach to sustainable product configuration design. Journal of cleaner production, 200, 756-769.
Mohebbi, A., Achiche, S., Baron, L. (2018). Multi-criteria fuzzy decision support for conceptual evaluation in design of mechatronic systems: a quadrotor design case study. Research in Engineering Design, 29(3), 329-349
Rivera, X.C.S., Leadley, C., Potter, L., Azapagic, A. (2019). Aiding the Design of Innovative and Sustainable Food Packaging: Integrating Techno-Environmental and Circular Economy Criteria. Energy Procedia, 161, 190-197
Chunhua, F., Shi, H., Guozhen, B. (2020). A group decision making method for sustainable design using intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations in the conceptual design stage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118640.
Polat, G., Bingol, B.N., Var, O. (2017). An Integrated Multi-criteria-decision-making Tool for Mechanical Designer Selection. Procedia engineering, 196, 278-285
Mohammed, A., Harris, I., Soroka, A., Nujoom, R. (2019). A hybrid MCDM-fuzzy multi-objective programming approach for a G-Resilient supply chain network design. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, 297-312
Bereketli, I., Genevois, M.E. (2013). An integrated QFDE approach for identifying improvement strategies in sustainable product development. Journal of cleaner production, 54, 188-198
Hashim, A.M., Dawal, S.Z.M. (2012). Kano model and QFD integration approach for ergonomic design improvement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57, 22-32.
Younesi, M., Roghanian, E. (2015). A framework for sustainable product design: a hybrid fuzzy approach based on quality function deployment for environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 385-394
Huang, Y.C., Tu, J.C., Hung, S.J. (2016). Developing a Decision Model of Sustainable Product Design and Development from Product Servicizing in Taiwan. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), 1285-1302.
Chowdhury, M. M. H., Quaddus, M. A. (2016). A multi-phased QFD based optimization approach to sustainable service design. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 165-178
He, B., Gu, Z. (2016). Sustainable design synthesis for product environmental footprints. Design Studies, 45, 159-186
Schöggl, J.P., Baumgartner, R.J., Hofer, D. (2017). Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1602-1617
Babbar, C., Amin, S. H. (2018). A multi-objective mathematical model integrating environmental concerns for supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy QFD in beverages industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 92, 27-38
Woodhouse, A., Davis, J., Pénicaud, C., Östergren, K. (2018). Sustainability checklist in support of the design of food processing. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 16, 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.008
Allaoui, H., Guo, Y., Choudhary, A., Bloemhof, J. (2018). Sustainable agro-food supply chain design using two-stage hybrid multi-objective decision-making approach. Computers & Operations Research, 89, 369-384
He, B., Niu, Y., Hou, S., Li, F. (2018). Sustainable design from functional domain to physical domain. Journal of cleaner production, 197, 1296-1306
Tao, J., Yu, S. (2018). Product life cycle design for sustainable value creation: methods of sustainable product development in the context of high value engineering. Procedia CIRP, 69, 25-30.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Wafa Guebsi, Alaeddine Zouari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with SPEKTA (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat: Teknologi dan Aplikasi) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
