Osh risk management of tank sinking procedure using bow tie analysis on the construction of a shell gasoline station in Surabaya

Authors

  • Oktomi Wijaya Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Laely Ufiz Tsani Sugiyana Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/posh.v1i2.6454

Keywords:

Bow Tie Analysis, Manajemen Risiko K3, Tank Sinking

Abstract

Introduction: The rate of work accidents in the construction sector is still high. Such a situation has led to the need for risk management in the area of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH). This study is aimed at finding the OSH risk management of the tank sinking procedure using Bow Tie Analysis method in the construction of a Shell Gasoline Station in Surabaya.

Methods: This is a qualitative descriptive study with case study design. The subjects of the study were the employees of PT Usaha Jaya Engineering who worked on the Tank Sinking procedure in the construction of a Shell Gasoline Station in Surabaya with the minimum service period of 2 years and with a total number of 7 people.  Data collection was executed using primary data derived from interviews and field observation as well as secondary data in the forms of supporting documents from the company.

Results: As many as 9 hazards were found in the tank sinking procedure in the construction of a Shell Gasoline Station in Surabaya. These hazards were caused by 5 factors, i.e., human, machine/equipment, method, material, and environment. The possible consequence of such hazards is that the employees may experience light to serious injuries and even fatality. Prevention and mitigation measures might be implemented in 4 hierarchical steps of risk management, i.e., substitution, technical management, administrative management, and personal protective equipment (PPE). This study found 6 escalation factors and the barrier of escalation factor in the tank sinking process.

Conclusion: The tank sinking procedure in the construction of a Shell Gas Station in Surabaya was a job with risks of work accident. Prevention and mitigation measures derived from the Bow Tie analysis might be implemented to prevent work accidents from occurring.

References

Brissel, L., Dupont, L., & Morel, L. (2013). Contribution to setting up a sustainable learning in an Eco-Neighbourhood development plan based on “serious game” May 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITMC.2013.7352607

British Standard Institution. (2018). BSI Standards Publication Risk management — Guidelines. BSI Standard Publication.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Salemba Empat.

Haikal, M., & Wijaya, S. M. (2018). Risiko Low Back Pain (LBP) pada Pekerja dengan Paparan Whole Body Vibration (WBV). J Agromedicine, 5(1), 529–533.

Hidayat, I. P., & Siswoyo. (2020). Analisa Risiko Kesehatan Dan Keselamatan Kerja Pada Proyek Pembangunan Perumahan Di Sidoarjo Jatim. Jurnal Rekayasa Dan Manajemen Konstruksi, 8(1), 35–44.

International Organization Labour. (2018). Meningkatkan Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Pekerja Muda. In Kantor Perburuhan Internasional , CH- 1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. http://www.oit.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-jakarta/documents/publication/wcms_627174.pdf

Mamik. (2015). Metodologi Kualitatif (C. Anwar (ed.)). Zifatama Publishing.

Ramli, S. (2020). Manajemen Risiko Dalam Perspektif K3 OHS Risk Management. Dian Rakyat. https://doi.org/10.24252/idaarah.v3i2.11281

Sari, M. P. (2017). Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja “Manajemen dan Implementasi K3 di Tempat Kerja. 1(2), 108–118.

Simanjuntak, M. R. A., & Praditya, R. (2012). Identifikasi Penyebab Risiko Kecelakaan Kerja Pada Kegiatan Konstruksi Bangunan Gedung di DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Median Engineering, 2, 85–99.

Simarmata, J., Makbul, R., Mansida, A., Amsah, L. O. M. Y., Rachim, F., Dharmawan, V., Bachtiar, E., Sumantrie, P., Simbolon, S., Erdawaty, Muadzah, & Herno Della, R. (2022). Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja. In Https://Medium.Com/. https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-case-a7e576e1b6bf

Sultan, M. (2021). Higiene Industri Penerapan di Sektor Perusahaan. Mazda Media.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Service. (2016). Toxicological Profile for Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbonyl Sulfide (Issue November). https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp114.pdf

Zulkarnain, M., Flora, R., Novrikasari, Harto, T., Apriani, D., & Adela, N. (2018). The risk quotient of sulfide hydrogen toward lung vital capacity of people living around landfill area. Kesmas, 12(3), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v12i3.1302

Downloads

Published

2023-01-24

How to Cite

Wijaya, O., & Sugiyana, L. U. T. . (2023). Osh risk management of tank sinking procedure using bow tie analysis on the construction of a shell gasoline station in Surabaya. Periodicals of Occupational Safety and Health, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.12928/posh.v1i2.6454

Issue

Section

Articles