From Violence to Virality: A Quantitative Analysis of Online Conversations Following the 2024 Terrorist Attacks in Germany
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/mms.v6i2.13921Keywords:
Discourse Analysis, Mediatization, Social Media Platforms, Terrorism , Quantitative AnalysisAbstract
Terrorist attacks are no longer isolated acts of violence; they are also events that reverberate within an interconnected platform ecosystem, where public discourse is shaped by online narratives and social media engagement. This study provides a quantitative analysis of online conversations following three major terrorist attacks that occurred in Germany in 2024: the Mannheim stabbing (May 31st), the Solingen attack (August 23rd), and the Magdeburg Christmas market incident (December 20th). The research examines engagement levels, keyword frequencies, hashtag usage, and platform-specific trends, offering valuable insights into terrorism-related narratives evolve in digital spaces. Through automated sentiment analysis and keyword tracking, this research highlights how public discourse on terrorism intertwines with broader ideological debates on immigration, security policies, and religious identity. These findings primarily contribute to media studies, specifically focusing on mediatization of terrorism and security crisis, offering insights into how digital ecosystems mediate public reactions to violence. The results underscore the need for responsible media reporting and nuanced policy responses to mitigate the spread of unregulated narratives and stigmatization of minority communities, fostering a more informed public discourse on security and radicalization.
References
Berger, J. M. (2018). Extremism. MIT Press.
Bloom, M. (2019). Small Arms: Children and Terrorism. Cornell University Press.
Braniff, W. (2021). Terrorism as a Business. Routledge.
Byman, D. L. (2020). Road Warriors: Foreign Fighters in the Armies of Jihad. Oxford University Press.
Choi, S. W. (2024). Transnational Terrorist Attacks. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-859
Correia, V. J. (2022). An explorative study into the importance of defining and classifying cyber terrorism in the United Kingdom. In SN Computer Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00962-5
Galea, S., Brewin, C. R., Jones, L. J., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2015). The Psychological Impact of Terrorism. Current Psychiatry Reports, 7(17), 56.
Gillani, D. (2022). Defining Terrorism: Why Does The UN Fail? Journal of Indian Studies. https://jis.pu.edu.pk/44/article/view/1065
Gunaratna, R., & Jia, L. (2017). Terrorism in the Asia-Pacific: Threat and Counter-strategies. World Scientific.
Hobfoll, S. E., Watson, P., Bell, C. C., Bryant, R. A., Brymer, M. J., Friedman, M. J., Friedman, M., Gersons, B. P. R., de Jong, J., Layne, C. M., Maguen, S., Neria, Y., Norwood, A. E., Pynoos, R. S., Reissman, D., Ruzek, J. I., Shalev, A. Y., Solomon, Z., Steinberg, A. M., & Ursano, R. J. (2007). Five Essential Elements of Immediate and Mid–Term Mass Trauma Intervention: Empirical Evidence. Psychiatry (New York), 70(4), 283–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2021.2005387
Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside Terrorism. Columbia University Press.
Iqbal, K., & Shah, N. A. (2018). Defining terrorism in Pakistani anti-terrorism law. Global Journal of Comparative Law. https://brill.com/view/journals/gjcl/7/2/article-p272_272.xml
Jackson, R. (2005). Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester University Press.
Kisla, S. N. (2022). The Role of the United Nations Security Council in the Fight against International Terrorism in the Context of the Problem of Defining Terrorism. ASBUHFD. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/asbulj4§ion=14
Lajevardi, N. (2021). The media matters: Muslim American portrayals and the effects on mass attitudes. The Journal of Politics, 83(3), 1060–1079. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/711300
Laqueur, W. (1977). Terrorism (First Edit). Little, Brown.
Nacos, B. L. (2016). Mass-Mediated Terrorism: Mainstream and Digital Media in Terrorism and Counterterrorism (3rd Edition (ed.)).
Neumann, P. R. (2020). The Problem of Right-Wing Terrorism. CTC Sentinel, 13(7), 1–7.
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, and Set of Capacities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150.
Pillar, P. R. (2001). Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy. Brookings Institution Press.
Pillar, P. R. (2016). Why America Misunderstands the World: National Experience and Roots of Misperception. Columbia University Press.
Popovic, M., & Kozar, S. (2023). Defining the concept of terrorism from the antropological perspective. Journal of Contemporary Philosophical …. http://journals.eikipub.com/index.php/jcpas/article/view/56
Rafique, N., Faraz, S., & Jabeen, I. (2023). Defining of Terrorism in Pakistan’s Anti-Terrorism Law. Research Journal of Social Sciences …. https://rjsser.org.pk/ojs/index.php/rjsser/article/view/587
Richardson, L. (2006). What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Enemy, Containing the Threat. Random House.
Sageman, M. (2017). Misunderstanding Terrorism. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Salehian, T., Gheytasi, S., & Ahmadinejad, H. (2025). The US Discursive Logic in Defining Terrorism: Representation of Hezbollah and Tahrir al-Sham. American Strategic Studies. https://asr.ihu.ac.ir/article_209748.html?lang=en
Schmid, A P. (2025). Defining Terrorism: Why It Matters. The Routledge Companion to Terrorism Studies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003540168-3
Schmid, Alex P. (2011). The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research. Routledge.
Schmid, Alex P. (2023). Defining Terrorism.
Schmidt, T. K. L., & von Sikorski, C. (2017). The Diffusion of Crisis-Related Communication on Social Media: An Empirical Analysis of Facebook Reactions. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1555–1564.
Schulz, W., & Wessler, H. (2019). Collective Sense-Making in Times of Crisis: Connecting Terror Management Theory with Social Media Use. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(2), 635–645.
Seib, P., & Janbek, D. M. (2010). Global Terrorism and New Media: The Post-Al Qaeda Generation. Routledge.
Singh, C. (2023). The Conundrum of Defining and Prosecuting Terrorism: A Review of United Kingdom and International Reponses. International Journal of Criminology …. https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/w24x5/the-conundrum-of-defining-and-prosecuting-terrorism-a-review-of-united-kingdom-and-international-reponses
Spaaij, R. (2010). Lone Wolf Terrorism: An Assessment." Trends in Organized Crime. Trends in Organized Crime, 13(3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2010.501426
Štětka, V., & Mihelj, S. (2024). The Illiberal Public Sphere: Media in Polarized Societies. Springer Nature.
Van der Brug, W., & van Spanje, J. (2023). How terrorist attacks distort public debates: A comparative study of the effects of terrorist attacks on political attitudes and preferences in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(4), 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2269194
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press.
Weimann, G. (2015). Terrorism in Cyberspace: The Next Generation. Columbia University Press. Columbia University Press.
Weimann, G., & Winn, C. (1994). The Theater of Terror: Mass Media and International Terrorism. Longman.
Xu, Z., Lin, Y., Cai, H., Zhang, W., Shi, J., & Situ, L. (2024). Risk assessment and categorization of terrorist attacks based on the Global Terrorism Database from 1970 to 2020. In Humanities and Social Science Communications. nature.com. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-03597-y
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Livio Calabresi, Michele Zizza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Mimesis agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
