GAMBARAN PERSENTASE PENURUNAN ANGKA KUMAN GEL HAND SANITIZER DAN TISU BASAH ANTISEPTIK PADA TELAPAK TANGAN

Authors

  • Musfirah Musfirah Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/jkpl.v1i2.4163

Keywords:

Germ number, hand sanitizer gel, wet-wipes antiseptic, palms

Abstract

Diarrhea is the third order of disease in the Southeast Asian region that causes death in adolescents. Handwashing behavior is really important in preventing diarrhea in Indonesia. Antiseptic wet wipes and hand sanitizer gel are an acceptable alternative for washing hands with soap and air. The study aimed to determine the percentage reduction of hand sanitizer gel and wet-wipes antiseptic at the quantity of hand germs. This study used a quantitative descriptive study with a true experiment research design with a randomized pretest-posttest control group design. The research subjects were one respondent who will conduct 6 steps with any treatment 4 times of repetition. The results of univariate analysis showed that hand sanitizer “brand B†and antiseptic wet tissue “brand B†had a percentage reduction in the highest number of germs due to the existing treatment, respectively 80,49% and 73,55%. The percentage reduction of the germs number on the palms was found in hand sanitizer gel “brand B†and antiseptic wet wipes “brand Bâ€.

Author Biography

Musfirah Musfirah, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Kesehatan Masyarakat

Peminatan Kesehatan Lingkungan

References

[1] Suraatmadja. 2010. Gastroenetrologi Anak. Jakarta: Sagung Seto.

[2] World Health Organization (WHO).2017. Strategic Guidance on ccelerating Actions for dolescent Health in South-East Asia Region. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 26, 1185–1203 (2017).

[3] Kemenkes RI. 2017. Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.

[4] Riskesdas. (2013). Status Gizi. Director, 15(2), 2017–2019. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2004.3.66178

[5] Wahyuni, V. H., Khotimah, S., Liana, D. F. 2017. Perbandingan Efektivitas antara Gel Hand Sanitizer dan Tisu Basah Antiseptik terhadap Jumlah Koloni Kuman di Tangan. 3, 808–819.

[6] Desiyanto, F. A. & Djannah, S. N. 2013. Efektivitas Mencuci Tangan Menggunakan Cairan Pembersih Tangan Antiseptik ( Hand Sanitizer ). J. Kesmas Vol 7, 55–112.

[7] Susanti. 2018. Indonesia Health Profile 2017. Ministry of Health Indonesia.

[8] Wuriyatmi, R., Rudijanto, H., Cahyono, T. 2016. Formula Rw Terhadap Penurunan Angka Kuman Pada Tangan Di Rsud Ajibarang Tahun 2016.

[9] Astuti, D. P., Husni, P., & Hartono, K. 2015. Farmaka Formulasi dan Uji Stabilitas Fisik Sediaan gel Antiseptik Tangan Minyak Atsiri Bunga Lavender (Lavandula angustifolia Miller ). Jurnal Farmaka, 15(1), 176–184.

[10] Asngad, A., Aprilia B. R., N. 2018. Kualitas pembersih Tangan Hand Sanitizer. J. Bioeksperimen 4, 61–70.

[11] Pedoman Penatalaksanaan Keracunan untuk Rumah Sakit tahun 2001. http://ik.pom.go.id/v2016/pedoman-penanganan-keracunan.

[12] Egwari, L. O., Ayepola, O. O., Adekeye, B., Adegbayi, T., Olurunshola, S., Kuye, A. 2016. Evaluating The Effect Of Hand Washing And Sanitization On The Microbial Burden Of The Hand. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 45, 277.

[13] Celeiro, M., Lamas, J. P., Jares, C. G., Llompart, M. 2015. Pressurized Liquid Extraction-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis Of Fragrance Allergens , Musks , Phthalates And Preservatives In Baby Wipes. J. Chromatogr. A 1384, 9–21.

[14] Munoz, L. P., Baez, A. G., Mckinney, D., Garelick, H. 2018. Characterisation of b flushable and b non-flushable commercial wet wipes using microraman , ftir spectroscopy and fluorescence microscopy : to flush or not to flush. J. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. , 25(20): 20268-20279

[15] Darmayani, S., Askrening., Ariyani, A. 2017. Comparison The Number Of Bacteria Between Washing Hands Using Soap and Sanitizer as a Bacteriology Learning Resource For Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 3(3), 258–265.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-28

Issue

Section

Articles