Redefining Consumer Utility in the Perspective of Islamic Economics Framework

Authors

  • Zein Muttaqin Postgraduate Student of Department of Economics, Kulliyah of Economics and Management Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia
  • Martini Dwi Pusparini Islamic University of Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/ijiefb.v2i1.717

Keywords:

Utility, Consumer Behaviour, Microeconomics, Islamic Economics

Abstract

 

An interest of individual preferences which can be represented in numerical ways known as the utility. While others stated it as a matter of subjective feeling that being felt in order to pursue and to maximize the certain level of satisfaction and personal well-being. According to neoclassical theory, this happened due to the contraction consumer preferences between things/products/services that available in the market. Furthermore, the ultimate ends that have been proposed are that the industry/market is spiritually neutral. On the other hand, some of Muslim scholars argue that spiritual or religious values are what defines an individual as a human, while all conducted of consumption is abide by ethics and religious values, which will not forsake others for personal gains. The integration of religious aspect in pursuing of maximization of utility is known as maslahah (i.e. well-being). A further discussion that arises is in Islamic economics framework, does individual orients solely to maximize their utility, even in the sense of maslahah is considered. Neoclassical claims that to interpret the utility, there are two headings is considered, they are prediction approach and prescription approach. The debate on neoclassical and Islamic economics perspectives might contradict one to another, but none of it is at absolute truth, the theory itself is still developing due to different assumptions and circumstances that present at that time. Furthermore, the revisiting theory of maqasidh al-sharia (i.e. the objective of Islamic Laws) also provides a different point of view regarding the debatable utility between neoclassical and Islamic economics. In pursuance of better understanding of utility, this article aims to redefine the consumer utility in Islamic economics framework. It can be concluded that the definition of utility under Islamic perspective as the act to seek self-actualization of benefit which collide to the benefit of others in pursuing of enhancement of dual dimensions objectives of present and hereafter. A strong point that being found that in order to maximize the utility/maslahah must consider the possibility of misleading the genuine motive of utility, which is not adjusting it under social pressures. The misleading act of such is categorized as the act of falsification of preferences.

References

REFERENCE
Adnan, A. A. (2011). Islamic Consumer Behavior (ICB): Its Why And What. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(21), 157–165.
Agil, S. O. S. (1989). Rationality in Economic Theory: A Critical Appraisal. Journal of Islamic Economics, 2(2), 79–93. Retrieved from IIUM Islamic Economic Collection Doc No. 730
Al-Mubarak, T., & Osmani, N. M. (2010). Applications of Maqasid al-Shari’ah and Maslahah in Islamic Banking. International Seminar on Islamic Finance, 1–10. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3578.0644
Al-Zarqa, M. A. (1992). A Partial Relationship In A Muslim’s Utility Function. In In Readings in Microeconomics: An Islamic Perspective (pp. 105–112). Kuala Lumpur: Longman.
Ali, A. J., & Wisniesk, J. M. (2010). Consumerism and ethical attitudes: an empirical study. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(1), 36–46.
Asutay, M. (2007). Conceptualisation of the Second Solution in Overcoming the Social Failure of Islamic Banking and Finance : Examining the Overpowering of Homo Islamicus. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management 15, 15(2), 167–195.
Aumann, R. J. (1962). Utility Theory without the Completeness Axiom. Econometrica, 30(3), 445–462. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1909888
Chipman, J. S. (1960). The Foundations of Utility. Econometrica, 28(2), 193–224. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1907717
Choudhury, M. A. (1984). An Islamic Approach of The Theory of Consumer Demand. Islamic Order Quarterly, 6(3), 66–74. Retrieved from IIUM Islamic Collecction Doc No. 29
Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Maqasid al-Shari’ah. Maslahah, and Corporate Social Responsibility. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 24(1), 25–44. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40535-8
El-ansary, W. (2005). The Quantum Enigma and Islamic Sciences of Nature : Implications for Islamic Economic Theory. In The Fifth Conference of the International Association of Islamic Economics (pp. 143–175). Jakarta. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228373253
Farooq, M. O. (2011). Self-Interest, Homo Islamicus and Some Behavioral Assumptions in Islamic Economics and Finance. International Journal of Excellence in Islamic Banking and Finance, 1(1), 52–79. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1740729%5Cnhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1740729
Fishburn, P. C. (1968). Utility Theory. Management Science, 14(5), 335–378. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2628674
Friedman, M. (1955). What All is Utility? The Economic Journal, 65(259), 405–409. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2227317
Furqani, H. (2014). Economic Problems and the Subject-Matter of Islamic Economics As a Body of Knowledge. In 2nd Asean International Conference on Islamic Finance (pp. 173–183). Yogyakarta.
Furqani, H. (2015). Individual and society in an Islamic ethical framework: Exploring key terminologies and the micro-foundations of Islamic economics. Humanomics, 31(1), 74–87. http://doi.org/10.1108/H-04-2014-0037
Ghassan, H. B. (2015). Islamic Consumer Model, Fairness Behavior and Asymptotic Utility. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
Hallaq, S. (1997). Beyond Rationalism: The Role of Values and Emotions In An Islamic Economy. Humanomics, 13(1), 20–39. http://doi.org/10.1108/eb018786
Hassan, N. M. H. N. (1996). Consumer Behaviour Theory From Islamic Perspective. IKIM Journal, 4(1), 49–62. Retrieved from IIUM Islamic Economic Collection Doc No. 4603
Hossain, B. (2014). Application of Islamic Consumer Theory: An Empirical Analysis in the Context of Bangladesh. Global Review of Islamic Economics and Business, 2(1), 69–83.
Kara, M. (2012). Pemikiran Al-Syatibi Tentang Maslahah dan Impelementasinya Dalam Pengembangan Ekonomi Syariah. ASSETS, 2(2), 173–184.
Kuran, T. (1997). Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. United States of America: Harvard University Press.
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. The Canadian Journal of Economics (Vol. 21). http://doi.org/10.2307/135312
Maurer, B. (2012). Re-formatting the economy: Islamic banking and finance in world politics. In Islam in World Politics (pp. 54–66). London: Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203356920
Pigou, A. C. (1903). Some Remarks on Utility. The Economic Journal, 13(49), 58–68. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2956866
Ribal, J. E. (1962). The Selfish Self: A Social Psychological Study of Social Character. University of Southern California. Retrieved from http://210.48.222.80/proxy.pac/docview/302160179?accountid=44024
Sen, A. (1987). On Ethics and Economics. Blackwell Publishing (Vol. 27). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. http://doi.org/10.2307/2554476
Sen, A. (1991). Utility: Ideas and terminology. Economics and Philosophy, 7(2), 277–283. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100001425

Downloads

Published

2019-06-24

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Ihtifaz, Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking Posting Your Article Policy at http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/ijiefb/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Ihtifaz, Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.