Redefining Consumer Utility in the Perspective of Islamic Economics Framework

Zein Muttaqin, Martini Dwi Pusparini

Abstract


 

An interest of individual preferences which can be represented in numerical ways known as the utility. While others stated it as a matter of subjective feeling that being felt in order to pursue and to maximize the certain level of satisfaction and personal well-being. According to neoclassical theory, this happened due to the contraction consumer preferences between things/products/services that available in the market. Furthermore, the ultimate ends that have been proposed are that the industry/market is spiritually neutral. On the other hand, some of Muslim scholars argue that spiritual or religious values are what defines an individual as a human, while all conducted of consumption is abide by ethics and religious values, which will not forsake others for personal gains. The integration of religious aspect in pursuing of maximization of utility is known as maslahah (i.e. well-being). A further discussion that arises is in Islamic economics framework, does individual orients solely to maximize their utility, even in the sense of maslahah is considered. Neoclassical claims that to interpret the utility, there are two headings is considered, they are prediction approach and prescription approach. The debate on neoclassical and Islamic economics perspectives might contradict one to another, but none of it is at absolute truth, the theory itself is still developing due to different assumptions and circumstances that present at that time. Furthermore, the revisiting theory of maqasidh al-sharia (i.e. the objective of Islamic Laws) also provides a different point of view regarding the debatable utility between neoclassical and Islamic economics. In pursuance of better understanding of utility, this article aims to redefine the consumer utility in Islamic economics framework. It can be concluded that the definition of utility under Islamic perspective as the act to seek self-actualization of benefit which collide to the benefit of others in pursuing of enhancement of dual dimensions objectives of present and hereafter. A strong point that being found that in order to maximize the utility/maslahah must consider the possibility of misleading the genuine motive of utility, which is not adjusting it under social pressures. The misleading act of such is categorized as the act of falsification of preferences.


Keywords


Utility, Consumer Behaviour, Microeconomics; Islamic Economics

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCE

Adnan, A. A. (2011). Islamic Consumer Behavior (ICB): Its Why And What. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(21), 157–165.

Agil, S. O. S. (1989). Rationality in Economic Theory: A Critical Appraisal. Journal of Islamic Economics, 2(2), 79–93. Retrieved from IIUM Islamic Economic Collection Doc No. 730

Al-Mubarak, T., & Osmani, N. M. (2010). Applications of Maqasid al-Shari’ah and Maslahah in Islamic Banking. International Seminar on Islamic Finance, 1–10. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3578.0644

Al-Zarqa, M. A. (1992). A Partial Relationship In A Muslim’s Utility Function. In In Readings in Microeconomics: An Islamic Perspective (pp. 105–112). Kuala Lumpur: Longman.

Ali, A. J., & Wisniesk, J. M. (2010). Consumerism and ethical attitudes: an empirical study. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(1), 36–46.

Asutay, M. (2007). Conceptualisation of the Second Solution in Overcoming the Social Failure of Islamic Banking and Finance : Examining the Overpowering of Homo Islamicus. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management 15, 15(2), 167–195.

Aumann, R. J. (1962). Utility Theory without the Completeness Axiom. Econometrica, 30(3), 445–462. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1909888

Chipman, J. S. (1960). The Foundations of Utility. Econometrica, 28(2), 193–224. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1907717

Choudhury, M. A. (1984). An Islamic Approach of The Theory of Consumer Demand. Islamic Order Quarterly, 6(3), 66–74. Retrieved from IIUM Islamic Collecction Doc No. 29

Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Maqasid al-Shari’ah. Maslahah, and Corporate Social Responsibility. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 24(1), 25–44. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40535-8

El-ansary, W. (2005). The Quantum Enigma and Islamic Sciences of Nature : Implications for Islamic Economic Theory. In The Fifth Conference of the International Association of Islamic Economics (pp. 143–175). Jakarta. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228373253

Farooq, M. O. (2011). Self-Interest, Homo Islamicus and Some Behavioral Assumptions in Islamic Economics and Finance. International Journal of Excellence in Islamic Banking and Finance, 1(1), 52–79. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1740729%5Cnhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1740729

Fishburn, P. C. (1968). Utility Theory. Management Science, 14(5), 335–378. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2628674

Friedman, M. (1955). What All is Utility? The Economic Journal, 65(259), 405–409. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2227317

Furqani, H. (2014). Economic Problems and the Subject-Matter of Islamic Economics As a Body of Knowledge. In 2nd Asean International Conference on Islamic Finance (pp. 173–183). Yogyakarta.

Furqani, H. (2015). Individual and society in an Islamic ethical framework: Exploring key terminologies and the micro-foundations of Islamic economics. Humanomics, 31(1), 74–87. http://doi.org/10.1108/H-04-2014-0037

Ghassan, H. B. (2015). Islamic Consumer Model, Fairness Behavior and Asymptotic Utility. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Hallaq, S. (1997). Beyond Rationalism: The Role of Values and Emotions In An Islamic Economy. Humanomics, 13(1), 20–39. http://doi.org/10.1108/eb018786

Hassan, N. M. H. N. (1996). Consumer Behaviour Theory From Islamic Perspective. IKIM Journal, 4(1), 49–62. Retrieved from IIUM Islamic Economic Collection Doc No. 4603

Hossain, B. (2014). Application of Islamic Consumer Theory: An Empirical Analysis in the Context of Bangladesh. Global Review of Islamic Economics and Business, 2(1), 69–83.

Kara, M. (2012). Pemikiran Al-Syatibi Tentang Maslahah dan Impelementasinya Dalam Pengembangan Ekonomi Syariah. ASSETS, 2(2), 173–184.

Kuran, T. (1997). Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. United States of America: Harvard University Press.

Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. The Canadian Journal of Economics (Vol. 21). http://doi.org/10.2307/135312

Maurer, B. (2012). Re-formatting the economy: Islamic banking and finance in world politics. In Islam in World Politics (pp. 54–66). London: Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203356920

Pigou, A. C. (1903). Some Remarks on Utility. The Economic Journal, 13(49), 58–68. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2956866

Ribal, J. E. (1962). The Selfish Self: A Social Psychological Study of Social Character. University of Southern California. Retrieved from http://210.48.222.80/proxy.pac/docview/302160179?accountid=44024

Sen, A. (1987). On Ethics and Economics. Blackwell Publishing (Vol. 27). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. http://doi.org/10.2307/2554476

Sen, A. (1991). Utility: Ideas and terminology. Economics and Philosophy, 7(2), 277–283. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100001425




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/ijiefb.v2i1.717

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Ihtifaz : Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking

Kampus 4 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Jl. Ring Road Selatan, Tamanan, Banguntapan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55191
Telp. (0274) 563515; Fax. (0274) 564604
E-mail : ihtifaz@uad.ac.id 


p-ISSN: 2622-4755 | e-ISSN: 2622-4798


View My Stats