Financial Technology Regulation in Malaysia and Indonesia: A Comparative Study

Aulia Arifatu Diniyya, Mahdiah Aulia, Rofiul Wahyudi

Abstract


Introduction to The Problem: The era of innovation in information technology has emerged to ease daily commercial transactions. The innovation in financial technology has created numerous new business model to cater the customers’ need. This development needs a regulation and supervision to avoid chaos in the financial system. Particularly in Indonesia and Malaysia, which both countries were recorded by CCAF to be among the top countries in the ASEAN region by the number of fintech firms.

Purpose/Objective Study: This study is aimed to analyze the financial technology regulation and supervision in Indonesia and Malaysia.

Design/Methodology/Approach: The comparative study is conducted to compare the regulatory environment related to Digital payment, Equity Crowdfunding, P2P lending, Crypto Asset, Consumer protection, cybersecurity law and Islamic fintech in both countries

Findings: The study found that compared to Malaysia, Indonesia has lack of jurisdiction that protecting the customer from the cyber-attack which highly threatening the fintech industry. Both countries also treat ICO differently. Malaysia treats it under RMO guidelines, while Indonesia banned it as the method of payment but still allows the trading of ICO as a commodity under Commodity Futures Regulatory Agency.


Keywords


Financial Technology; Indonesia; Malaysia; Regulation; Supervision.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alt, R., & Puschmann, T. (2012). The rise of customer-oriented banking - electronic markets are paving the way for change in the financial industry. Electronic Markets, 22(4), 203-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12525-012-0106-2

Aulia, M., Yustiardhi, A. F., & Permatasari, R. O. (2020). An overview of Indonesian regulatory framework on Islamic financial technology (fintech). Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 6(1), 64-75.

Batunanggar S. (2019). “Fintech Development and Regulatory Frameworks in Indonesia”, ADBI Working Paper 1014. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo

CCAF, ADBI, FinTechSpace (2019). ASEAN FinTech Ecosystem Benchmarking Study. Cambridge, UK.

Standard, D. (2018). Islamic Fintech Report 2018: Current Landscape & Path Forward. Retrieved from: https://www.dinarstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Islamic-Fintech-Report-2018.pdf

Hapsari, R.A., Maroni, Satria I., Ariani N.D. (2019), “The Existence of Regulatory Sandbox to Encourage the Growth of Financial Technology in Indonesia”, FIAT JUSTISIA. Faculty of Law, Lampung University, Vol 13 No 3, pp. 271-288

https://mdec.my/about-mdec/who-we-are/

Indonesia Fintech Landscape Report (2018), Fintechnews.sg, Singapore.

International Monetary Fund (2020). Malaysia; Selected Issues. IMF, Washington DC

Ketchell, M. (2019), Indonesia needs to fix ‘authoritarian’ clauses in bill on cyber security before passing it into law, September 4 2019. Retrieved from: http://theconversation.com/indonesia-needs-to-fix-authoritarian-clauses-in-bill-on-cyber-security-before-passing-it-into-law-122342

KPMG International (2019), Regulation and Supervision of Fintech, Ever-expanding Expectations, Swiss

Manan, Y.M. (2019), “Sistem Integrasi Proteksi & Manajemen Resiko Platform Fintech peer to peer (P2P) Lending dan Payment Gateway untuk Meningkatkan”, Ihtifaz Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking, Vol 2, No 1, pp. 73-87

Akselerasi Pertumbuhan UMKM 3.0

OJK (2020). Penyelenggara Fintech Terdaftar dan Berizin di OJK per 19 Februari 2020. Retrieved from: https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/publikasi/Pages/Penyelenggara-Fintech-Terdaftar-dan-Berizin-di-OJK-per-19-Februari-2020.aspx

Pin, T., et al. (2019), “An Adoption of Fintech Services in Malaysia”, South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 18, Issue 5

PWC (2018). “Pwc Indonesia Legal Alert; New Bank Indonesia Regulation on e-Money”. Retrieved from: https://www.pwc.com/id/en/publications/legal/pwcid-legal-alert-2018-05.pdf

Salmony, M. (2014). Access to accounts: why banks should embrace an open future. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, 8(2), 169–170.

Securities Commission (2014), SC Releases Public Response on Proposed Equity Crowdfunding Framework 25 September 2014. Retrieved from: https://www.sc.com.my/resources/media-releases-and-announcements/sc-releases-public-response-on-proposed-equity-crowdfunding-framework

Securities Commission (2019), Guidelines on Recognized Market. Retrieved from: https://www.sc.com.my/api/documentms/download.ashx?id=eb8f1b04-d744-4f9a-a6b6-ff8f6fee8701

Securities Commission (2019), List of Registered Recognized Market Operators. Retrieved from: https://www.sc.com.my/development/digital/list-of-registered-recognized-market-operators

Touch ‘n Go Ewallet Malaysia Fintech




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/ijiefb.v3i2.2703

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Ihtifaz : Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking

Kampus 4 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Jl. Ring Road Selatan, Tamanan, Banguntapan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55191
Telp. (0274) 563515; Fax. (0274) 564604
E-mail : ihtifaz@uad.ac.id 


p-ISSN: 2622-4755 | e-ISSN: 2622-4798


View My Stats