Risk Analysis of Sharia Bank Financing Contract

Authors

  • Riduwan Riduwan Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta
  • Gita Danupranata Management Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/ijiefb.v3i1.1943

Keywords:

Sharia Banks, Contract, Financing Risks

Abstract

Non-Performing Financing (NPF) is the inability of customers to meet their obligations in accordance with the contract, which can be categorized into three types namely substandard, doubtful and bad debt (macet). NPF is the main and biggest risk for sharia banks, hence the ability of sharia banks to identify, measure, monitor and control the risks of financing and capital provision is very important. Sharia banks will face greater risks than conventional banks because of the risk of sharia reputation. Besides being influenced by internal and external factors of sharia banks, NPF can also be influenced by the financing contract (akad) used.

This study analyzes the level of financing risk based on the contract. The population and sample are all Sharia Rural Banks in Indonesia with 167 secondary data in the form of the publication of financial statements for 2011-2018. Analysis of the data using quantitative descriptive methods with a survey approach. The analyzed data are NPF data based on an eight year financing contract.

 This study managed to obtain data that the BPRS is more interested in financing with certainty of results, proven that murabahah has the highest outstanding compared to other contract. The results of this study also indicate that the low risk contract is in the murabahah contract, while the contract with the medium risk is in the mudarabah, musyarakah, multijasa, qard and istisna and the contract with the highest risk is salam and ijarah contract.

References

Arifin, Z., (2002), Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Bank Syariah, Jakarta, Alfabeta.
Besner, C. dan Hobbs, B., (2015), “The Paradox of Risk Management a Project Management Practice Perspective”, International Journal of Managing Project in Business, 5 (2).
Bilal, AR., (2013) “Remodeling Risk Management in Banking; Evident from the Sub-Continent and Gulf”, The Journal of Risk Finance, 15 (5).
Edwin, M., dan Ranti W., (2007) “Profit Sharing dan Moral Hazard dalam Penyaluran Dana Pihak Ketiga di Indonesia”, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, Volume VIII, Jakarta.
Enrisman, JW., (2015), Put People at the Centre of Global Risk Management, Macmillan Publisher Limeted.
Hanafi, MM., (2012), Manajemen Risiko, Yogyakarta, UPP AMP YKPN.
Hassan, A.,(2009), “Risk Management Practices of Islamic Banks of Brunei Darrusalam”. The Journal of Risk Finance, 10 (1), 23-37.
Karim, AW., (2000), “Incentive Compatible Constrain for Islamic Banking Some Leassons from Bank Muamalat Indonesia,” Conference Paper, Fourth International Conference on Islamic Economics and Banking, Loughbaorough University, UK, August, 13-15.
Khan, MM., dan Bhatti, MI., (2008), “Development in Islamic Banking; A Financial Risk-Allocation Approach” The Journal of Risk Finance, 9 (1), 40-51.
Khan, T. dan Habib, A., (2001), “Risk Management an Analysis of Issues in Islamic Financial Industry”, Occasional Paper, Islamic Development Bank-Islamic Research and Training Institute, Jeddah-Saudi Arabia.
Mahfudz, A., (2015), Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Yogyakarta, Aswaja Pretindo.
Miah, MD., dan Sharmeen, K., (2015), “Relationship Between Capital, Risk and Efficieny A Comparative Study between Islamic and Conventional Bank of Bangladesh”, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastren Finance and Management, 8 (2), 203-221
Mulyono, TP., (2001), Manajemen Perkreditan bagi Bank Komersiil, Yogyakarta, BPFE.
Preda, C., (2013), “Implementating A Risk Management Standard”, Journal of Devense Resourches Management, Belgium, 4,(1/6).
Rustam, BR., (2013), Manajemen Risiko Perbankan Syariah, Jakarta, Salemba Empat.
Shadique, O. et al., (2011), “Defferences in the Risk Management Practices of Islamic Versus Conventional Financial Institution in Pakistan, An Empirical Study”, The Journal of Risk Management, 15 (2).
Xiang, P., et al. (2012), “Construction Project in Risk Management Based on the View of Asymmetric Information”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138,(1), 1303-1311.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-23

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Ihtifaz, Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking Posting Your Article Policy at http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/ijiefb/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Ihtifaz, Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.