Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The JCP covers a broad range of topics, including socio determinant of health, social psychology, sociology,  anthropology medicine, health co­m­munication, health education, health-related behaviour, community empowerment, community organization and community development.

Topik-topik Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes (JCP) mencakup faktor sosial  yang mempengaruhi kesehatan, psikologi kesehatan, sosiologi dan antropologi kesehatan, komunikasi kesehatan, pendidikan kesehatan, perilaku yang berhubungann dengan kesehatan, pemberdayaan masyarakat, pengorganisasian dan pengembangan masyarakat. 

JCP welcomes papers on the literature review and researches using quan­titative or qualitative methods. All of the papers published are freely available as downloadable pdf files.

JCP menerima artikel dalam bentuk literatur review dan penelitian yang menggunakan metode kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Semua artikel yang dipublikasikan dapat diunduh dalam bentuk file pdf.   

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes uses double-blind peer review for each submitted article. Every paper submitted to JCP for publication is subject to peer review. The peer review in this journal is an evaluation of the submitted paper by two or more individuals of similar competence to the author of the paper. It aims to determine the academic paper's suitability for publication. The peer-review method is employed to maintain standards of quality and provide credibility to the papers published in this journal. 

Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes menggunakan sistem review artikel dimana penulis artikel dan reviewer tidak saling tahu satu sama lain. Setiap artikel yang dikirimkan ke JCP adalah subjek yang akan direview.  Setiap artikel yang diserahkan ke jurnal ini akan direview oleh dua orang reviewer yang memiliki kompetensi sesuai dengan artikel yang direview. Metode pemilihan reviewer sesuai dengan standard kualitas dan yang bersangkutan memiliki kredibiltas yang mumpuni untuk mengevaluasi artikel-artikel di jurnal ini.        

 

 

Publication Frequency

JURNAL CAKRAWALA PROMKES Published twice a year, on February and August.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. The Editorial Board is responsible for, among others, preventing publication malpractice. Unethical behavior is unacceptable, and the Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes does not tolerate plagiarism in any form. Authors who submitted articles: affirm that manuscript contents are original. Furthermore, the authors’ submission also implies that the manuscript has not been published previously in any language, either wholly or partly, and is not currently submitted for publication elsewhere. Editors, authors, and reviewers, within the Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes, are to be fully committed to good publication practice and accept the responsibility for fulfilling the following duties and responsibilities, as set by the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors. As part of the Core Practices, COPE has written guidelines on the http://publicationethics.org/resources/guideline

Section A: Publication and authorship 

  1. All submitted papers are subject to a strict peer-review process by at least two International Reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. Review processes are blind peer review.
  3. The factors taken into account in the review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability, and language.
  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication. 

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
  4. Authors must participate in the peer-review process. 
  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors. 

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information. 
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.
  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture of research’s funding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity, and relevance to publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason. 
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers. 
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should accept papers based on suspicions; they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers, and board members.

 

Retraction

The papers published in the Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes (JCP) will be considered to retract in the publication if:

  1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error).
  2. The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing and permission or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication).
  3. It constitutes plagiarism.
  4. It reports unethical research.

The mechanism of retraction follows the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org.

 

Plagiarism Policy

Papers submitted to the Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes will be screened for plagiarism using CrossCheck/iThenticate plagiarism detection tools. Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes will immediately reject papers leading to plagiarism or self-plagiarism.

Before submitting articles to reviewers, those are first checked for similarity/plagiarism tool, by a member of the editorial team. The papers submitted to the Jurnal Cakrawala Promkes must have a similarity level of less than 20% and if more are rejected.