Effectiveness of Microsoft Kaizala and Google Classroom towards students’ mathematical communication skill and self-efficacy in learning statistics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/bamme.v2i1.5523Keywords:
Google Classroom, Learning statistics, Mathematical communication, Microsoft Kaizala, Self-efficacyAbstract
This study aims to describe the effectiveness and differences in the effectiveness of the learning platform with Google Classroom and Microsoft Kaizala in terms of self-efficacy and students' mathematical communication skills. The population of this research is the XII grade students of SMK Negeri 1 Giritronto Wonogiri which consists of sevent classes. From the existing population, two classes were taken randomly, namely twelfth grade of TKJ-I and twelfth grade of TKJ-II as research samples. Twelfth grade of TKJ-I was given treatment by learning using the Microsoft Kaizala platform, while twelfth grade of TKJ-II was given treatment using the Google Classroom platform. The research data were analyzed by statistical one sample t-test, MANOVA test with Hotelling's T2 at a significant level of 0.05 and univariate test to determine which platform is more effective. The results showed that: (1) statistical learning using the Microsoft Kaizala platform was effective in terms of mathematical communication and self-efficacy, while the Google Classroom platform was effective in terms of mathematical communication but not effective in terms of self-efficacy; (2) there is a difference in effectiveness between the Microsoft Kaizala platform and Google Classroom. The Microsot Kaizala platform is more effective than Google Classroom in terms of the mathematical communication skills of class twelfth grade students of SMK Negeri 1 Giritronto Wonogiri.
References
Aguspinal. (2011). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMA melalui Pendekatan Open-Ended dengan Strategi Group-To-Group. Thesis. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Ansari, B. I. (2018). Komunikasi Matematik: Strategi Berfikir dan Manajemen Belajar. Konsep dan Aplikasi. Banda Aceh: PeNA.
Ansori, M., Nurkamto, J., Suparno. (2019). Integrating Hots into Efl Classroom: Teacher’s Perception and Classroom Behavior. Proceeding of the 16th JETA International Conference 1 “HOTS-oriented English Instruction”, 1-6.
Azwar, S. (2008). Sikap Manusia: Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. America Psychology, 37(2), 122–147.
Capraro, R.M., Capraro, M. M, and Rupley, W. H. (2012). Reading-Enhanced Word Problem Solving: A Theoretical Model. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(1), 91–114.
Guerreiro, A., and Serrazina L. (2009). Communication as Social Interaction Primary School Teacher Practices. Proceedings of CERME 6. In Atas da Sixth Conference of European Research in Mathematics Education, 1744-1750.
Hodiyanto, H. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Ditinjau dari Gender. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 219-228.
Ibrahim. (2011). Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi, Penalaran, dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis serta Kecerdasan Emosional Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis-Masalah Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah. Disertasi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google Classroom: What Works and How? Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3, 12-18
Juhrani, Suyitno, H., Khumaedi. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Berdasarkan Self-Efficacy Siswa pada Model Pembelajaran MEA. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(2), 251-258.
Khovivah, A., Theresia, M., Utami, N., and Ardelia, T. (2021). Learning Media Used When Learning Distance: Analysis of Strengths and Weaknesses of Google Classroom in Distance Learning. Indonesian Science Education Research, 3(1), 19-25.
Mohmmed, A. O., Khidhir, B. A., Nazeer, A., Vijayan, V.J. (2020). Emergency Remote Teaching During Coronavirus Pandemic: The Current Trend and Future Directive at Middle East College Oman. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 5(3). 1-11.
Nartani, C. I., Hidayat, R. A., and Sumiyati, Y. (2015). Communication in Mathematics Contextual. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 2(4). 2349-5219.
Parlina, M., Septian, A., Inayah, S. (2021). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran E-LearningBerbantuan Aplikasi Kaizala. Jurnal Pedagogik, 4 (2), 23-31.
Putri, R. I. & Santosa, R.H. (2015). Keefektifan Strategi React Ditinjau Dari Prestasi Belajar, Kemampuan Penyelesaian Masalah, Koneksi Matematis, Self Efficacy. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 262-272.
Sari, N. M., Setiani, A., Rinangkit, I., and Munawar, H. S. (2021). The Development of Teaching Materials Based on Problem Solving Exploration with Microsoft Kaizala Applications. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 253 – 266.
Stevens, J. (2002). Applied Multivariate Statis-Tics For The Social Sciences. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Wichelt, L., and Kearney, N.E. (2009). Communication: A Vital Skill of Mathematics. Action Research Projects. Paper 18. Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska. Lincoln.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Andriyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
