Measurement and spatial difference of agricultural green development level in Guangxi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/bamme.v1i2.4805Keywords:
Green development of agriculture, Entropy method, Difference analysisAbstract
Green development of agriculture is the foundation of the entire green development. As a big agricultural province, promoting the green development of agriculture is conducive to promoting the high-quality development of agriculture and rural revitalization in Guangxi. This paper firstly analyzes the domestic and foreign scholars' research on the green development of agriculture, combined with the relevant policy theory, constructs the index system from the three aspects of green production, economic benefits and living standards, and then uses the entropy method to calculate the index weight and the comprehensive score of the green development of Agriculture in Guangxi, it analyzes the development trend of agricultural green development in Guangxi from 2010 to 2019 and the spatial differences of agricultural green development in 14 cities of Guangxi in 2019 afterwards. Finally, the following conclusions are drawn: the agricultural green development in Guangxi is on the rise from 2010 to 2019, but the development of green production is still in stagnancy; the overall level of Guangxi's agricultural green development in 2019 is relatively low, the best comprehensive developed cities are Guilin and Yulin, while the Hechi got the worst comprehensive score. According to the above conclusion, Guangxi should increase investment in science and technology to promote green agricultural production, focus on the overall development of the city to achieve regional coordination, give full play to the linkage effect of the city, and encourage well-developed cities to drive the development of surrounding cities.
References
Chenghao, Q. (2017). Research on the evaluation of China's agricultural green development level in the economic transition period based on entropy. National Prices, 11, 16-19.
Jianjie, Z., & Shilei, C. (2020). The construction and illustration of China's agricultural green development index system. China Ecological Agriculture Journal of Industry and Commerce, 28(8): 1113-1126.
Lina, Y., & Guiying, G. (2018). Research on measurement and influencing factors of green development level of agriculture in Ningxia. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1. Available at: https://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-LXLX201801001.htm.
Lockeretz, W. (1989). Problems in evaluating the economics of ecological agriculture. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 27(1-4), 67-75.
Saimei, J. (2019). Evaluation of China's provincial agricultural green development level and regional differences. Search, 2, 89-95.
Yao, Z., Dongning, L., & Yong, M. (2020). Construction and application of Shaanxi agricultural green development evaluation system from the perspective of rural revitalization use. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 6, 12-17.
Zhuangli, L., & Jing, T. (2016). The construction of the evaluation index system of the development level of Guangxi's green agriculture. Agriculture Network Information, 11, 12-15.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Quan Qin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
