Clustering of productivity in the food, plantation, and farm sectors in Mamasa Regency using K-Means clustering analysis

Authors

  • Muhammad Zulfadhli Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Kesumaning Dyah Larasati Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Rizky Fitria Ramadhanni Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Raynaldi Anggiat Samuel Siahaan Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Mochamad Fatih Romadlon Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/bamme.v6i1.15064

Keywords:

Applied mathematics, ecludian distance, K-Means clustering, mamasa, productivity

Abstract

The productivity of the food, plantation, and farm sectors is the main driver of the economy in Mamasa Regency. However, there are significant disparities between subdistricts, requiring targeted development strategies. This study aims to group 17 subdistricts based on the productivity characteristics of the three main sectors using the K-Means Clustering method. The secondary data analyzed includes productivity, production, planted area, and the number of farmers/ranchers for each sector. The research stages include descriptive analysis, identification of leading commodities, and classification of subdistricts based on the productivity of each sector. The analysis results divide the subdistricts into three main clusters with different characteristics. Cluster 1 (High Productivity) is dominated by leading subdistricts, such as Pana for cattle farming, Nosu for Arabica coffee, and Tabulahan for patchouli. Cluster 2 (Medium Productivity) includes subdistricts with balanced performance in several commodities, while Cluster 3 (Low Productivity) consists of subdistricts that still face challenges in land optimization, production, and cultivation efficiency. The implication of this study is cluster-based policy recommendations. Local governments are advised to implement specific strategies, such as developing cattle breeding centers in Pana, processing Arabica coffee in Nosu, and patchouli industry in Tabulahan. For low-productivity clusters, interventions are directed at improving infrastructure, access to inputs, and technological assistance. With this evidence-based strategy, local potential can be optimized, regional disparities reduced, and economic growth in Mamasa Regency can be more inclusive and sustainable.

References

Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., & Williams, T. A. (2020). Statistics for business and economics. Cengage Learning.

Arifin, B., Rahman, A., Prasetyo, D., & Lestari, S. (2021). Agricultural productivity disparities in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Agriculture, 15(2), 45–60.

Chen, X., & Li, Y. (2022). Evidence-based agricultural policy making in developing regions. Journal of Rural Development, 45(2), 112–128.

Fuglie, K., Heisey, P., King, J., & Schimmelpfennig, D. (2020). Agricultural productivity and economic growth. Agricultural Economics, 51(1), 23–38.

Gupta, R., & Kumar, S. (2023). Spatial clustering for agricultural zoning: A case study of Northern India. Agricultural Systems, 195, 103–115.

Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2022). Data mining: Concepts and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann.

Haryanto, A. E. P., & Zulfadhli, M. (2024). Grouping provinces based on Minimum Competency Assessment results to improve education quality in Indonesia. Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan, 12(2), 155–163.

Ismail, F. A., Albarr, A. C., Zulfadhli, M., & Wulandar, S. P. (2024). Pengelompokan kabupaten di Jawa Tengah berdasarkan faktor yang memengaruhi Indeks Pembangunan Manusia tahun 2022 menggunakan analisis cluster. Blantika: Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(1), 67–82.

James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2021). An introduction to statistical learning. Springer.

Kumar, A., & Singh, R. (2022). Cluster-based agricultural development in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(3), 89–104.

Maryudi, A., Santoso, H., Putra, R., & Anwar, M. (2022). Location-specific approaches for agricultural development. Indonesian Journal of Development Studies, 10(1), 34–49.

Porter, M. E. (2021). Competitive advantage of regions. Harvard Business Review Press.

Prasetyo, A., Nugroho, W., Hidayat, R., & Lestari, T. (2022). Regional disparities in agricultural productivity: Evidence from Indonesia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 19(1), 45–62.

Saputra, R., Widodo, S., Hartono, A., & Lestari, D. (2021). Rice productivity clustering in East Java. Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(2), 112–125.

Sari, D., & Wijaya, K. (2021). Cluster-based mapping for agricultural development planning. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(3), 78–92.

Tan, P. N., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, V. (2021). Introduction to data mining. Pearson Education.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2020). Economic development. Pearson Education.

Triola, M. F. (2021). Elementary statistics. Pearson Education.

Wahyuni, S., & Fitriani, N. (2022). Plantation commodity mapping in South Sulawesi. Agro Economic Journal, 13(1), 67–82.

Witten, I. H., Frank, E., Hall, M. A., & Pal, C. J. (2023). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann.

Zhao, L., Chen, M., Huang, X., & Li, Y. (2023). Advanced clustering methods for regional analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 194, 106–120.

Zulfadhli, M., Iswadi, A., Nurdin, S. Z., Muflikhah, S., Izzaty, N. R., Fatika, I., & Choirunnisa, T. F. (2025). Estimasi proporsi swing voter di kalangan pemilih pemula pada Pemilu 2024: Studi kasus Kota Salatiga dengan metode stratified two-stage cluster sampling. Codeverse: Journal of Emerging Digital Realities, 1(1), 1–7.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

Issue

Section

Articles